similar to: [LLVMdev] What is the meaning of addRegisterDead function

Hi Quentin and llvm-dev, I've got a regalloc-related question that you might have an opinion or answer about. In our out-of-tree target we've been doing some bundling before register allocation for quite some time now, and last night a new problem popped up. What the fix should be depends on if this bundle is legal or not: BUNDLE %vreg39<imp-def,dead> *

Hello, I have a problem with Hausman test. I am performing my analysis with these commands: > library(plm) > data<-read.csv2("paolo.csv",header=TRUE) > data< pdata.frame(data,index=c("FIRM","YEAR"),drop.index=TRUE,row.names=TRUE) > RECEIV~LSIZE+LAGE+LAGE2+CFLOW+STLEV+FCOST+PGROWTH+NGROWTH+TURN+GPROF+GPROF2 >

Hi, everyone: I am very sorry to trouble you, but I need your help about my problem about ThreadLocalImpl in llvm of 2.8 version. I have compiled it in Windows xp with mingw, and have compiled skyeye(an open source project about simulator) as it uses llvm. But when I run a testcase ---- arm_hello, it came out segment fault. I used gdb.exe to trace it, it gave the following infomation: $

Hi, > I am very sorry to trouble you, but I need your help about my problem about > ThreadLocalImpl in llvm of 2.8 version. this is a very old version of LLVM, I suggest you try something newer, eg the recently released version 3.1. Best wishes, Duncan. I have compiled it in Windows xp with > mingw, and have compiled skyeye(an open source project about simulator) as it > uses

Note the typo in your 3rd line: data < Don't know if this means anything... Bert On Feb 11, 2018 7:33 AM, "PAOLO PILI" <paolo.pili at student.unife.it> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with Hausman test. I am performing my analysis with these > commands: > > > library(plm) > > data<-read.csv2("paolo.csv",header=TRUE) >

you are right about the 3rd line but it doesn't help me for my problem. I remove the 3rd line but there is still the same problem: Error in solve.default (dvcov): the system is numerically unique: reciprocity condition value = 1.63418e-19 Paolo 2018-02-11 16:54 GMT+01:00 Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com>: > Note the typo in your 3rd line: data < > > Don't

> On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 27, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Quentin and llvm-dev, >> >> I've got a regalloc-related question that you might have an opinion or answer about. >> >> In our out-of-tree

Hello, again. I'm interested to learn how programmers develop & test C/C++ code with R packages in Linux. I've been reading R source and the manual on Writing R Extensions but there are just a couple of details I can't understand. I wish I could watch over a developer's shoulder to see how people actually do this. I've tested a bit. I am able to take package.tar.gz

Howdy. I'm working on Altivec versions of some of the libFLAC functions. I figured the best candidates would be those that had MMX/SSE/3dnow versions, and I picked FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() to do first, since it's relatively simple. In stepping through some runs, it appears that 'order' mod 4 is always 0. Is that guaranteed, either by the format or by higher functions in the

Hi, all. Does anyone know how to profile R interpreter? I've tried gprof but it doesn't work. Thanks. Xiaoming [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey guys, I am trying to speed up some of my LLVM/llc passes. Is there a way to use something like gprof on llc? If not, do you guys know anything that I can use to discover which routines of my passes are taking most of the time? thanks, Fernando

Hi, Standard approach to profiling dynamically loaded libraries with gprof doesn't seem to work with LLVM: export LD_PROFILE=Mylib.so export LD_PROFILE_OUTPUT=. make ENABLE_PROFILING=1 // compiling my project opt -load Profile/Mylib.so -options... but no Mylib.so.profile (or gmon.out) is produced. Profiling libc.so.6 usage by "ls -l", however, works fine. Could anyone explain

I needed the following patch to be able to use gprof with profiled build. regards, Benoit --- a/Makefile.rules (revision 37946) +++ b/Makefile.rules (working copy) @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ CXX.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g C.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g LD.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g + KEEP_SYMBOLS := 1 else ifeq ($(ENABLE_OPTIMIZED),1) BuildMode := Release

If anyone has some reasonably valid gprof output laying around (from a vorbis encoding run), could you email it to me? Thanks, --Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No

I have inherited a legacy S-plus system with about 10,000 lines of S and 10,000 lines of Fortran. It's now running under R. However, I would like to profile the fortran code with gprof or prof for performance tuning. I've successfully linked the .so file into a simple C driver program and profiled, but I can't seem to get profiling to work when using dyn.load() to use it from R. Do

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:46:19AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Thanks for the patch. I applied it and it give me up to 15% in speed. > Doesn't seem to change the results, which is a good thing (though you > originally forgot a "used=0" in vq_nbest_sign). I'll check a thing or > two and I'll apply to CVS. D'oh. My carelessness, sorry! :) > Strange...

Hi, I've setup a wlan ap using a an alix 2d2 (AMD Geode LX 500 Mhz + AES Offload) and am now trying to encapsulate the wlan traffic into a vpn (tap bridge). Though even when disabling crypto and digest (there is a crypto engine onboard can be setup to handle tinc encryption), the best throughput I get is aroung 2,9 MByte per second (wget+http) (even if the client is run locally). The network

Hello, attached is a gzipped patch file to the lib/mcomp.c source file of theora (as of AnonCVS current version) that implements MMX and extended-MMX optimizations in the most frequently used functions of the encoder (as shown by gprof). This is more a proof of concept than a real request for inclusion into the source tree. My personal intent was more to look deeper into the MMX instruction set

Now I am trying to use LLVM to write a simulator and take LLVM as IR to dynamic translate machine code, I encounter some issues when try to write some IR to express writting a value to the reigster. The situation is described as the following description. write_reg is my function for writing "v" to the register indicated by "index". ptr_gpr is the struct pointer for my

Author: mike_s Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e144729d8b901f4092085ea17a31bf10d1089f79 Log message: 6273860 gcc and sgs/gprof don''t get along 6273866 gcc and sgs/prof don''t get along Files: update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/Makefile.com update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/arcs.c update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/dfn.c update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/gprof.c