similar to: [LLVMdev] PARSEC Patch

Would someone please merge this for me? --Patrick On 08/05/10 13:43, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite > infrastructure? The patch is available at > [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no > objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? > > Best regards, > --Patrick

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Patrick, > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >> files to all the pieces I want to merge.  These are blackscholes, >> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >>

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

If you disable them at configure time, they won't be run. You probably want: --enable-targets=host --disable-jit Reid On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Patrick Simmons <simmon12 at illinois.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't > figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends.  Because the code > uses

Hello, I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends. Because the code uses inline assembly, only the llc backend works. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, --Patrick -- If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I get back before I return, please keep me here.

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit my

Patrick, On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: > It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT > files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, > canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before

Has anyone ever used pool allocation on PARSEC? If not, has anyone ever compiled PARSEC to whole-program LLVM bytecode executables? If you have done either of these things, would you please email me your .bldconf files? Thanks, --Patrick

There was some talk a year ago about a patch that merges PARSEC into the test suite. Here is a link to the thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033877.html Has this just fallen through the cracks? Any help on this subject is welcome. Thanks! -- Wonsun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm trying to run the tests in llvm-suite, but I've run into trouble. First, I had the llvm-suite checkout in a directory alongside the llvm compiler checkout, but, when I ran "make" from llvm-suite, it complained about there not being a Makefile two levels above it, so I moved llvm-suite into the "test" subdirectory inside the llvm compiler checkout. I ran

Okay, are C standard library functions typically external in a fully linked LLVM bytecode file? --Patrick Andrew Lenharth wrote: > If the function is external, then DSA won't create a graph for it. > > Andrew > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Alexander > Simmons<simmon12 at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> I'm noticing that DSA graphs are not

I read this before posting; however, that article says that the first operand to this instruction must be a pointer type. The type I have is [16 x i8*], not [16 x i8*]*. --Patrick Óscar Fuentes wrote: > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel as well. > > Patrick Simmons <simmon12 at illinois.edu>

Hi, I'm trying to run the pool allocation pass through opt, and I'm running into problems. It segfaults frequently; for example, it does this when the input is a simple Hello World program: [simmon12 at apoc testcases]$ opt -load /home/vadve/simmon12/llvm/llvm/projects/llvm-poolalloc/Debug/lib/libLLVMDataStructure.so -load

Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick Alexander > Simmons<simmon12 at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> I'm iterating over all LoadInst and StoreInst-type Instructions in a >> Function, and getNodeForValue() is sometimes returning NULL. Why is >> this happening? Shouldn't every load from or store to memory correspond >> to some

If the function is external, then DSA won't create a graph for it. Andrew On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Alexander Simmons<simmon12 at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > I'm noticing that DSA graphs are not created for library functions like > "puts".  The bytecode file runs with lli, so I think I did my linking > okay.  Is this normal, or does it mean I'm

2009/9/15 Patrick Simmons <simmon12 at illinois.edu>: > cmake -G "Eclipse CDT4 - Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Debug" > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;PowerPC;CBackend" > /home/renato/llvm-sources Thanks Patrick, I'll give it a try. At least now I know that it can be done. My previous attempts all ended up in memory

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Patrick Simmons<simmon12 at illinois.edu> wrote: > What is this used for?  Does DSA put anything here?  If I want to add > call sites here during my pass, will it confuse pool allocation if it > runs afterwards?  If so, is there any way I could clear it at the end of > my pass? This is used for unprocessed callsites. Clearing it between DSA

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick Alexander Simmons<simmon12 at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > I'm iterating over all LoadInst and StoreInst-type Instructions in a > Function, and getNodeForValue() is sometimes returning NULL.  Why is > this happening?  Shouldn't every load from or store to memory correspond > to some DSNode? Not if the pointer is null or the pointer