similar to: [LLVMdev] Patch to fix BrainF runtime assertion failure

On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:05:52PM -0700, Dan Hipschman wrote: > Could someone apply this for me, please? I just realized I didn't fix up the comments completely. Here's an identical patch plus two comment to reference the new intrinsic suffix. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BrainF.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1311 bytes Desc: not

On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:26:35PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > I am finding that llvm 2.8 rc3 with dragonegg svn built against current > > gcc-4_5-branch doesn't appear to allow gfortran to use -ffast-math. Attempting > > to compile code using the dragonegg plugin under gcc 4.5.2 with that option produces the error... > > > > f951:

I actually need this feature quite badly in my untyped language compiler: since I support first-class functions, I've made the types of all functions a standard vararg (so I can box them). The implementation crashes when I try to read out the value of gc.result. Hints as to what might be wrong? Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> ---

Anton, With regard to the gfortran test cases which don't fail on x86_64 Linux, these are the exact gfortran.log entries for them under i686 Darwin9... > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Executing on host:

On 2/22/11 1:31 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > I want to clone a given function, and add an argument to it. I then > want to add a call to that new function. I have a callInstruction CI, > which I want to transform to call this new function, and to take a new > argument. If I understand correctly, you're cloning the function first and then adding a new argument to

Hi, I want to clone a given function, and add an argument to it. I then want to add a call to that new function. I have a callInstruction CI, which I want to transform to call this new function, and to take a new argument. The code I added was as follows CI->getCalledFunction()->dump(); Function* DirectF = CloneFunction(CI->getCalledFunction());

Please unsubscribe me from this list. Sujatha Gurumurthy Staffing Consultant/Talent Advisor UMG - Ultra Mobile Group sujatha.gurumurthy at intel.com US ERP Manager Interested in Employee Referral Program Visit referral.intel.com/ Intel USA Employee Referral Program Group 100 Best Companies to Work For 2011: Intel - INTC - from FORTUNE -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at

Hello, I'm having troubles with writing a pass. In my pass I've have created a function that has two parameters - both of type i8*. Initially I wrote this function in C, that I translated it into IR, and then by using llc -march=cpp I got it's implementation in cpp code that actually inserts IR instructions. Then, I inserted this cpp code in my pass. And in some places of a program

Dear All, I'm getting the following error building mainline llvm-gcc 4.2 (LLVM and llvm-gcc are up to date): cc1: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:290: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*): Assertion `(FTy->getNumParams() == 1 || (FTy->isVarArg() && FTy->getNumParams() == 0)) && "Calling a function with bad

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: > > statement functions > intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) > loops, goto statments > scalarized array operations > function calls with *no arguments* > simple common blocks Great! > Function calls with more than one argument don't work.

Hi Ahmad, On 03/01/13 16:26, Hassan, Ahmad wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. > The code snippet looks like the following: > > Constant *func; > > void add( Module *M) { > > func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); this function has no

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

On 2/25/13 1:44 PM, teja tamboli wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to > iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do > following things : Interesting. Just out of curiosity, can you tell us what your project is about? > > 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the

The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at all, so I had to work from my own sample codes, and generate test cases from them. Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: statement functions intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) loops, goto statments scalarized array operations function calls with *no arguments* simple common

Hi all, I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do following things : 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the function. 2. Based on its data type like character array or integer array, pointer, int, char, take different action. 3. I have added following code to check its

I found these lines in the BrainF example: //declare i32 @getchar() getchar_func = cast<Function>(module-> getOrInsertFunction("getchar", IntegerType::getInt32Ty(C), NULL)); //declare i32 @putchar(i32) putchar_func = cast<Function>(module-> getOrInsertFunction("putchar", IntegerType::getInt32Ty(C),

I'm trying to use CallInst::Create to construct a call to a variadic function, and I'm running into the following assertion failure: /localhome/simmon12/workspace/llvm-sources/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:297: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value* const*, unsigned int): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType())

The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 around 7PM PDT. The assertion is Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/

Hi! I have this error while building my code: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!") Actually I'm trying to load functions from .bc file and use them in the code that I'm building with IRBuilder. I found that function parameter type is %struct.reValue* and

On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:23 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 > around 7PM PDT. The assertion is > > Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) > == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad > signature!"), function init, file