similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.8 Release Schedule (Revised)

Good news, everybody! It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only hope to perform as well as she has. This is my first time as release manager, so bear with me if things don't go smoothly. This message is mostly to give you an idea of the schedule we're planning on. It's an aggressive

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:57:05 -0700 Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good news, everybody! > > It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm > taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only > hope to perform as well as she has. This is my first time as release > manager, so bear with me if things don't go

We have pushed back the release a couple of weeks. Below is the revised schedule: 3/7 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 3/13 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/20 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/27 - Pre-release2 released & community testing begins 4/3 - Pre-release2 testing ends 4/5 - Release As a reminder, all major changes need to be checked in 1 week before code freeze.

I apologize for the delay in setting the 2.6 schedule. Please be aware that we are now moving to a ~6 month release cycle. In addition, 2.6 will be our first release that includes Clang. 08/21 - Code freeze 08/28 - Pre-release1 testing begins 09/04 - Pre-release1 testing ends 09/11 - Pre-release2 testing begins 09/18 - Pre-release2 testing ends 09/21 - Release 2.6 For those that emailed me

Below is the 2.7 release schedule: 2/21 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 2/27 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/6 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/13 - Pre-release2 released & community testing begins 3/20 - Pre-release2 testing ends 3/22 - Release Please remember that all major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code freeze. Thanks, Tanya

On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. >>> >>> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code >>> freeze to ensure adequate

Hi, I would like to compare 2 lists resulted from a sql query! bu there are different levels, so when I want to do: release1<-sqlQuery(channel,paste("select distinct c.ID,c.Title TitleCrit from category cat, category_criteria cc, criteria c, question_criteria qc, question q, form_question fq, form f, release_form rf, release r, product_release pr, product p where cat.ID=cc.category and

Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code freeze to ensure adequate testing. Please do your part to keep the tree stable in the days leading up to the code freeze. Thanks! -Tanya 2/21 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 2/27 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/6 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/13

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. > > I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down > miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the > "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for > 2.7. > > Tanya, I can

I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for 2.7. Tanya, I can also do the x86-32-pc-linux release testing if no one else steps up. - Daniel On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Douglas

The 2.7 pre-release testing ends tomorrow March 24th (11:59PM PDT). I've updated the 2.7 release schedule to include a one week regression fixing week. This is only for regressions found in 2.7 and not for miscellaneous bug fixes. I will no longer be merging in patches that are not a regression as defined in our release process (http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify).

On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote: >> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. >> >> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code >> freeze to ensure adequate testing. Please do your part to keep the tree >> stable in the days leading up to the

On Tuesday, I began my pre-release2 testing. We will no longer be accepting any patches for 2.6 unless they meet the criteria of a regression: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify I've already filed a few regressions. Please see the master 2.6 bug: http://llvm.org/PR4886 Assuming the best, the 2.6 release schedule is as follows (shifted 2 weeks): Sept 25 -

Hello, I'd like to clarify a few points on how the release process works. Each release must satisfy the following criteria for each supported target: * LLVM-GCC & LLVM must build in both release and debug mode. They must also build srcDir != objDir. LLVM-GCC must build with support for c, c++, fortran, and obj-c/obj-c++ (Mac only). * LLVM-GCC must bootstrap. * "make check"

Hi Tanya, The sources weren't updated for this pre-release testing. So I had the same problems on PPC. -bw On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Tanya Lattner<lattner at apple.com> wrote: > LLVMers, > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of both > clang

On Aug 4, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Török Edwin wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:57:05 -0700 > Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Good news, everybody! >> >> It's that time of year again. We are going to release LLVM 2.8! I'm >> taking over for Tanya to give her a much needed break. I can only >> hope to perform as well as she has. This

On Mar 8, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 03/08/11 04:01, Bill Wendling wrote: >> It's that time again! (Well, it was that time yesterday, but I made a mistake.) The LLVM 2.9 release is now underway! > >> Developers: >> >> Top-of-tree is now open for submissions. The 2.9 release branch and tags are available for you to check out and test.

Hi Tanya, I have tried the 2.6 pre-release on the following host : Windows XP pro SP2 with mingw/msys : uname -a MINGW32_NT-5.1 OLIVE 1.0.10(0.46/3/2) 2004-03-15 07:17 i686 unknown gcc -v Reading specs from d:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.5/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads

Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing > a new bug. > >

On 2009-08-31 08:50, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > Hi Tanya, Here are the results for x86_64 Linux (Debian unstable): > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in