similar to: [LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] [Patch] a utils/GenLibDeps.pl patch for running it on Windows

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] [Patch] a utils/GenLibDeps.pl patch for running it on Windows"

2010 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] [Patch] a utils/GenLibDeps.pl patch for running it on Windows
Hello > I found utils/GenLibDeps.pl cann't run on Windows, so I fix it, made a patch > on svn-110435. I submit this patch, hope it can be accepted. It definitely works for me on windows (not only for me, but for many others too). Which problems you're seeing? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2008 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >> I'm seeing a failure related to circular library references while >> building LLVM with CMake and MSYS. This didn't happen on the >> past. Building with the configure script works, so it seems something >> related to CMake. Do you have any insight on this? >> > I'll get back on this tonight or
2008 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > > [snip] > >> My internal priority for that CMake patch is low, as I need only minimal >> patching to use the autoconf-generated configure script to build LLVM. >> Right now it's just llvm.config.in.in that needs patching (the failsafed >> GenLibDeps.pl script went in
2008 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >>> * I am seeing desynchronization between the configure-generated >>> Makefiles and the CMakeFile.txt files. [e.g., llc; makefile doesn't >>> have asmprinter, CMakeFile.txt does]. That much I should be able to >>> construct a patch for "blind", if no-one gets to it first. >>>
2010 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] How to access Debug Type Information (from Cbackend)
Hi, I'm trying to recover the inheritance relations for a class type (so a list of base classes) from a llvm ir file generated via compiling some cpp file using clang. I have access to the TypeSymbolTable and have found the class type I want to know the base classes for in the table. How do I go about extracting this (debug) information? I'm stuck here: if(StructType*
2008 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > >> * I am seeing desynchronization between the configure-generated >> Makefiles and the CMakeFile.txt files. [e.g., llc; makefile doesn't >> have asmprinter, CMakeFile.txt does]. That much I should be able to >> construct a patch for "blind", if no-one gets to it first.
2008 Oct 11
4
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: [snip] >> That does not really surprise me about CMake, but then mingw is not a >> primary compiler on Windows, more so is VC++ or Intel, either way a >> bug should be submitted to the CMake devs. > I do not want to troll the CMake devteam, so I will not submit the bug > report without a full-blown patch. The CMake
2008 Oct 12
4
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Hello, Everyone > On this specific case, IIRC, MinGW chokes if asmprinter is not on the > list of components. This may be another consequence of the malfunctoning > of llvm-config/GenLibDeps.pl on MinGW/MSYS. This works for me without any problems on mingw32. What are the problems you're seeing? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov
2008 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > The CMake devteam is very responsive about bug reports. They will > certainly appreciate your bug report, no patch required. > I still don't think I have enough detail to file a bug report (not sure exactly what they need to know about my system configuration to make it testable). I did go ahead (just now) and ask the main CMake mailing list which files I
2009 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hi Nathan, > The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else being > equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to recognize > the first version: > --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) > +++ GenLibDeps.pl (working copy) > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ > print " <dt><b>$lib</b</dt><dd><ul>\n";
2009 Aug 19
2
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > >> The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else being >> equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to recognize >> the first version: >> --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) >> +++ GenLibDeps.pl (working copy) >> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ >> print "
2009 Aug 11
6
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hi all, I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that have crept in since 2.5, fixes below: 1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is: // Check if building with -fPIC #if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__) #define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT" #else #define ASMCALLSUFFIX #endif Which causes a link failure due to the non-PLT
2010 Jun 22
3
[LLVMdev] Error building with Mingw on Win7
Hello everyone, I've run across a problem building LLVM 2.7 with Mingw on Win7. When I try make VERBOSE=1, it churns away happily for a while and then produces: /c/Perl/bin/perl /c/Programs32/llvm-2.7/utils/GenLibDeps.pl -flat /c/Programs 32/llvm-2.7/obj/Release/lib "/mingw/bin/nm" > /c/Programs32/llvm-2.7/obj/tools/ llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp 'c:' is not recognized as
2006 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] mingw binary is corrupt
SevenThunders wrote: > > > Someone reported this earlier but the situation remains unchanged. > > -Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > Thanks for getting it back up so quickly. Now if I
2009 Apr 20
1
[LLVMdev] mingw build problems
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: >> The attached patch makes GenLibDeps.pl notice that nm has failed, so >> that the build fails immediately rather than giving more obscure >> errors later on. > > Would you mind applying the patch? > Sure. But could you add a message to the "die" commands? Something like: close
2008 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] GenLibsDep.pl fail-over for broken piping
Hello, This patch adjusts GenLibDeps.pl to avoid falsely reporting that all libraries have no dependencies whatsoever. If the %DepLibs hash proves to be empty after the loop in the gen_one_entry function: * Assume that the command processor isn't *NIX-like enough to handle the piped command. * Redo the hash construction (beyond the $nmPath invocation) in Perl. Kenneth -------------- next
2011 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] tools/llvm-config/find-cycles.pl
We've had some problems with false complaints about circular dependencies from tools/llvm-config/find-cycles.pl in the past but just worked around them. Sometimes if you have nested directories which include header files from other enclosing directories you get this problem. Today we realized that it seems to be Ubuntu related ( or perhaps the version of perl on Ubuntu or some other tool
2006 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] Getting Started with LLVM
On Mar 14, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Gnome (and many other Unix projects with massively ugly >> dependencies) can be linked trivially using a "foo-config" script. >> If LLVM had something similar, it might save new LLVM developers >> several hours of digging through manuals and Makefiles. > > This would be very very cool to have. OK!
2011 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-config: Add support for LIBDIR_SUFFIX.
--- autoconf/configure.ac | 4 +++- cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake.in | 3 ++- configure | 4 +++- tools/llvm-config/Makefile | 6 ++++++ tools/llvm-config/llvm-config.in.in | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/autoconf/configure.ac b/autoconf/configure.ac index f3e94e8..cd943cc 100644 ---
2008 May 30
1
[LLVMdev] Patches for Solaris on x86 solaris
Hi all, As mentioned earlier, we've been working on getting LLVM to build on Solaris on x86/x86-64. The changes required turned out to be fairly minor, so it's perhaps a bit of a stretch to call it a "port". There were two main issues that we ran into here: 1. The Solaris x86 ABI by default defines the x86 registers CS, DS, ES, etc in the system headers, which