similar to: [LLVMdev] regarding multicore support for LLVM

It is so difficult ... Which FE? It need BE support? I didn't get it. 2010/8/4 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Yeah OpenMP support. I read that it has a front end support but not the > back end. So are there any projects or teams looking at this issue. > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Liu <proljc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Multicore? >> You

On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Liu wrote: > It is so difficult ... > Which FE? It need BE support? I didn't get it. > > 2010/8/4 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Yeah OpenMP support. I read that it has a front end support but not the back end. So are there any projects or teams looking at this issue. > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Liu <proljc at

Multicore? You want OpenMP support? 2010/8/3 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Hi all, > I am new to this LLVM. I went through the documenation of LLVM but > I didn't find any support for Multicore. Is there any such possibility where > multicore architecture can be exploited using LLVM. > > > > Thanks > Vijay > >

I'm using Clang but not llvm-gcc. Now, I get it. Maybe Clang will support it soon, but I think it have nothing to do with BE... 2010/8/4 Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> > > On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Liu wrote: > > > It is so difficult ... > > Which FE? It need BE support? I didn't get it. > > > > 2010/8/4 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at

On 08/03/2010 09:34 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:08 AM, vijay kumar<vijaygbvv at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am new to this LLVM. I went through the documenation of LLVM but >> I didn't find any support for Multicore. Is there any such possibility where >> multicore architecture can be exploited using LLVM. >>

Sir, I want to apply mclapply() function for my analysis. So, I have to install multicore package. But I can not install the package. >install.packages("multicore") It gives that package multicore is not available. Can you help me? Regards, Suman Dhara [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I want to parallelize some computations when it's possible on multicore machines. Each computation produces a big objects that I don't want to store if not necessary: in the end only the object that best fits my data have to be returned. In non-parallel mode, a single gloabl object is updated if the current computation gets a better result than the best previously found. My plan

Is there any reason to expect a problem ? i'm running this script on the cluster down the hall: module load R/2.11.0 R library(multicore) fxx<-function(ll) runif(1) mclapply(1:10,fxx) i get: Error in fork() : Unable to fork. less /proc/cpuinfo yields: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU

Hello All, In general when we use Rprof for performance evaluation on Multicore systems the output provides the time on the basis of the "user" time and the sampling time is equal to the the user time as reported by system.time. This does not seem right behavior when R is linked to BLAS/Lapack or other libraries which are optimized for parallel or multicore architectures as

Hello All, In general when we use Rprof for performance evaluation on Multicore systems the output provides the time on the basis of the "user" time and the sampling time is equal to the the user time as reported by system.time. This does not seem right behavior when R is linked to BLAS/Lapack or other libraries which are optimized for parallel or multicore architectures as

This is a 'rather than re-invent the wheel' post. Has anyone out there re-written combn so that it can be parallelized - with multicore, snow, or otherwise? I have a job that requires large numbers of combinations, and rather than get all of the index values, then crank it through mclapply, I was wondering if there was a way to just do this natively within a function. Just curious.

dear r experts---Is there a multicore equivalent of by(), just like mclapply() is the multicore equivalent of lapply()? if not, is there a fast way to convert a data.table into a list based on a column that lapply and mclapply can consume? advice appreciated...as always. regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch (ivo.welch at gmail.com)

Hi, in R 2.12.1, R CMD check hangs when building a vignette that uses a foreach loop with the doMC parallel backend. This does not happen in R 2.13.1, nor if I use doSEQ instead of doMC. All versions of multicore, doMC and foreach are the same on both my R installations. Has anybody encountered a similar issue? Thank you. Renaud ### UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN This e-mail is subject to the

Dear List, the advent of multicore machines in the consumer segment makes me wonder whether it would, at least in principle, be possible to divide a computational task into more slave R processes running on the different cores of the same processor, more or less in the way package SNOW would do on a cluster. I am thinking of simple 'embarassingly parallel' problems, just like inverting

The attached code produces corrupted pdfs (test2.pdf, test4.pdf and test5.pdf). The resulting pdf depends on how many cores are available on the machine. I don't see why there should be any difference between the pdfs (exept for the timestamp). Doing many operations involving mclapply can increase the size of the resulting pdf by ten times! Thank you for checking this. require(multicore)

Hi all, I have R installed on a box, which is running on a machine with 16 core and Redhat - Linux. I am handling huge (size of dataset will be 5 GB) dataset. Lets assume that my data is in the form of structured (multiple) logs. I access the data by using all.files(). Since by default basic version of R utilizes single core, the processing of my analysis code is taking too much time. I got to

Hi, i have a function: zz<- (constrOptim(c(.5,0), fr, grr, ui=rbind(c(-1,0),c(1,-1)), ci=c(-0.9,0.1))) i can get the result by using command (for example): zz$par now if i can use multicore: zz<-parallel(constrOptim(c(.5,0), fr, grr, ui=rbind(c(-1,0),c(1,-1)), ci=c(-0.9,0.1))) result < collect(zz) i cant get my the result: result$par because multicore add process id. for example:

Hi, I would like to get suggestion about parallel computing package on a multicore windows workstation. I tried doSMP, but it crashes R a lot. I am wondering if "snow" and "snowfall" can be used on a single workstation (i,e, not cluster). At suggestion would be appreciated, Best, Richard [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

How would I rewrite my code so that I can implement the use of multicore on an Rstudio server to run regsubsets using the "exhaustive" method? The data has 1200 variables and 9000 obs so the code has been shortened here: model<-regsubsets(price~x + y + z + a + b + ...., data=sample, nvmax=500, method=c("exhaustive")) Our server is a quad core 7.5 gb ram, is that

Dear R-helpers, I am puzzled by the following observation: On my home dual core Windows desktop computer, I am used to running two R sessions in parallel. These do very well in using the full CPU of the computer (half each) and don't seem to slow each other down. Today I have started some large computation effort in one of our university labs, and I intended to go for two R sessions per