similar to: [LLVMdev] Trying to access the user defined variable name

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have the following source code: > > long f(long x, long y) > { >        long u; > >   u = x+y; >   return u; > }; > > After clang (with debug option set) and llvm opt using mem2reg, I get > the following .ll file >

Hi Devang, Thanks for your reply. You mentioned " First parameter is the compiler generated temp. and 3rd parameter provides info about the variable, including its name 'u'." I did manage to get this far. But, I am finding it difficult to access this info using LLVM APIs. The third parameter is of type "metadata". So I was able to access it by casting it to MDNode.

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi Devang, > > Thanks for your reply. You mentioned > " First parameter is the compiler generated temp. and 3rd parameter > provides info about the variable, including its name 'u'." > > I did manage to get this far. But, I am finding it difficult to

Hi, Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static functions when they are not being called anywhere inside the current module. Other compilers seem to generate intermediate code (lcc, for instance). Thanks for your reply..Olivier. Sincerely Arvind On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Olivier Meurant

Ah ok. Sorry. :) I think that argument "-femit-all-decls" will help you. Olivier. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam < arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any > way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static > functions when they are not being

Hi, I am trying to compile a single module (dgemm.c) using clang and generate dgemm.ll. Command: clang -emit-llvm dgemm.c -S -o dgemm.ll Some of the functions are declared as static and clang ignores these functions: One of the functions is: static void innerloop(double a, const double* b, double* c, double beta) { *b = a*beta; return; } Is there any way to make clang generate llvm code

Hi Arvind, you need to use it effectively : static int add(int a, int b) { return a+b; } int use() { return add(4,5); } ==> ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" define i32 @use()

Hi, I have been working towards generating my own IR code from llvm IR. I have hit a stumbling block with respect to "getelementptr" used inside another llvm instruction. Example: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* getelementptr inbounds ([10 x i32]* @k, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %tmp2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1] I am unable to get a handle on the second "getelementptr" in this

Hi Arvind, > I have been working towards generating my own IR code from llvm IR. I > have hit a stumbling block with respect to "getelementptr" used inside > another llvm instruction. > > Example: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* getelementptr > inbounds ([10 x i32]* @k, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %tmp2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1] > > I am unable to get a handle on

Hi, I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR line number back to its C source code line number. Thanks Sincerely Arvind -- Arvind Sudarsanam Utah State University Phone: (435) 512-7769 E-mail: theonemorpheus at gmail.com Web-site: http://cc.usu.edu/~asudarsanam

Hi Folks, I ran into this assertion failure while compiling a function with a large number of arguments: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21609 I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed diff is attached to the bug. However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need

Hi, I have been working towards developing compiler optimization tools targeting multi core processors while using LLVM IR as the starting point and building on top of the analysis and optimization passes available in the llvm source. Recently, I looked into Open64 and its intermediate representation WHIRL. Documentation for developers to use Open64 seems to be inadequate (when compared to LLVM

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe duncan's fixed this recently in 235956 and 235955 - does ToT work > for you? It seems like r235955 might have fixed it. However I'm having build issues with ToT in my environment. Is this the right place to check ToT build status: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/one_line_per_build > > On

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization phases, Inline for aggressive inline opt. LNO for loop opt, WOPT for machine independent opt(

Hi all, I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting x86 32-bit: ; ModuleID = 'check.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32" target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" @.str581 = internal constant [52 x i8] c"---- test number %d

Hi, I want to know the variable mapping between the source and llvm bytecode. It seems that current llvm debugging information cannot provide this mapping directly. Here is my examples (llvm 2.7). In this exmaple, I want to know the mapping: tmp<--->%4. But current llvm's debugging information can only provide that the instruction "%4 = add nsw i32 %3, 2" is at line 3 in

Hi all, Anyone have ideas/info on this topic ? Thanks Seb 2012/3/2 Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> > Hi all, > > I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting > x86 32-bit: > > ; ModuleID = 'check.c' > target datalayout = >

On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Anyone have ideas/info on this topic ? > Thanks > Seb > > 2012/3/2 Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> > Hi all, > > I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting x86 32-bit: > > ; ModuleID = 'check.c' > target datalayout =

Hi all, I have the following C code. static int addp(int *c, int a,int b) { int x = *c + a + b; return(x); } I want to replace *c with a scalar. So I tried the -argpromotion pass. However, it fails to do anything to the resulting llvm file. List of commands: clang add.c -c -o add.bc clang add.c -S -o add.ll opt -argpromotion -stats add.bc -o add_a.bc llvm-dis < add_a.bc > add_a.ll Also,

Hi, I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR line number back to its C source code line number. Thanks Sincerely Arvind ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ Arvind Sudarsanam Phone: (435) 512-7769 CPU Technology, Inc