similar to: [LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#ccxx_compile_units > > !1 = metadata !{ >  i32 524329,    ;; Tag >  metadata !"MySource.cpp", >  metadata !"/Users/mine/sources", >  metadata !3    ;; Compile unit > } > > !2 is the Compile Unit, right? !3 is also

On 13 July 2010 17:54, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. Thanks for catching this. > Fixed r108246. Most welcome. ;) Btw, the 2.6 debug information (referred from the blog) doesn't warn users that it's deprecated, nor it links to the new info (in an obvious manner, at least), that is completely different. That happens with the release notes that

On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 13 July 2010 17:54, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes. Thanks for catching this. >> Fixed r108246. > > Most welcome. ;) > > Btw, the 2.6 debug information (referred from the blog) doesn't warn > users that it's deprecated, nor it links to the new info (in an > obvious

Pankaj, On Oct 3, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Pankaj Gode wrote: > Hi All, > > int global; > int func( int t) > { > //scope 1 > { > .... > } <----- > return x; > } > > For the above code, i want to collect endline (indicated by <---) for the scope. Can we get this information from the Dwarf Information in llvm 2.9 ? > If there is no code

Hi,   The link and the information shared was helpful.   I will make my problem definition more clear. While I am "asm printing" target code, I also want to emit scope related information. Scope related information includes, - for each scope, start line, end line, start column, end column and - scope heirarchy. As scope is delimited by "{" and "}" (for an input

Pankaj, If you want to decorate MachineInstrs then for the end of scope you're not looking at "}" but instead you're looking at _last_ machine instruction in that scope. Now, if you want to find out start and end MachineInstrs for a lexical scope (and corresponding line numbers) then see CodeGen/LexicalScopes pass. It collects lexical scope information and maps MIs to respective

Hi All,   int global; int func( int t) {    //scope 1   {      ....   } <-----   return x; }   For the above code, i want to collect endline (indicated by <---) for the scope. Can we get this information from the Dwarf Information in llvm 2.9 ?     Thanks & Regards, Pankaj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear list, I want to run latex from an R script: system("latex mysource.tex") or: texi2dvi("mysource.tex", pdf = TRUE, clean = FALSE, quiet = TRUE, texi2dvi = latex) but latex does not seem to be on the search path: /bin/sh: line 1: latex: command not found. Although 'printenv PATH' tells me that the usr/texbin is looked for executables:

Hi all, Is anyone using any flavour of Unix to develop LLVM? I suppose the Apple guys are using Mac, right? ;) I've seen some docs on the website to set-up Visual Studio but I haven't seen anything related to cross-platform IDEs (such as Eclipse) and how to attach the tests to them. So far I'm not doing any modifications to the LLVM and my project is still too small to become a

> Inline the init function: store 11 at the address of the "value" variable, > call printf with the string from r5. This is a bug, should have stored at an > offset of four (str r1, [r4,4]). Exactly! The IR is correct, the bug seems to be lower down. I'm no expert in the ARM back-end, though. But your report is detailed enough to help whoever is. ;) cheers, --renato

Hi all, I spend the last two weeks looking for solutions to print HTML files out of the wiki format. I tried to create a Perl hack (wasn't generic enough), a C++ parser/printer (would take too long) and looked into Deplate and some Wikimedia specific tools to convert to docbook, pdf and HTML. The last one was the most successful one (printed a nice PDF) but the XHTML was no good for Chrome

Seems the last use of DIFactory in LLVM/Clang is in: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp to get the enums llvm::DIFactory::OpDeref and llvm::DIFactory::OpPlus. Shouldn't this be moved to DIBuilder and remove the dependency completely? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm

Hi all, My example compiler is working fine on Linux, including the extern'd functions (via -rdynamic flag on linker), but a friend on a MacOS (Darwin) cannot find the extern'd function. LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'printVar' which could not be resolved! I've read some posts on the web indicating problems with the -rdynamic option on Mac's GCC, but I'm

On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > FYI > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:18 AM, <frederik at ofb.net> wrote: > Hi Kynn, > > Thanks for expanding. > > I wrote a function like yours when I first started using R. It's > basically the same up to your "new.env()" line, I don't do anything > with environmentns. I just called my function "mysource" and it's > essentially a "source

On 21 September 2010 17:48, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > In the combined llvm IR, @p3 and @p won't match as expected. Hi Devang, That's not quite what I was thinking... Maybe I explained badly... Imagine this: -- a.ll -- %struct.x = type { i32, i32 } %a = call void @func (%struct.x %b) -- b.ll -- %struct.y = type { i32, i32 } declare i32 @func (%struct.y)

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > with llvm-g++ from subversion, and on x86-64 linux, I also see that > virtual.llvm-gpp is larger than virtual.gpp, but by a factor of 3. Hi Duncan, I'm using mainstream 2.5 (from Ubuntu repo). I should be compiling the svn tree this weekend, though. > The sizes of the .o files are: >  g++: 9704

Hi All, Thanks for all the ideas, seems that the easiest approach is to create a single main function and work up the goto statement back and forth and put a return at the end of every block to avoid unwanted state change. Although, if I ever want to merge two pieces of code, which is not at all unlikely, I might have non-trivial problems. In that case, the tail call optimization seems a good

2009/9/14 Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan at auroraux.org>: > screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot. Well, being a Linux GNU zealot doesn't invalidate numbers. What does invalidate is that he has no numbers! He just fired a few applications and counted the seconds, this is utterly pointless. No reference to how many times he ran, standard deviations,

Hi Renato, I've been using LLVM with Eclipse for a while now. The way to do it is to build LLVM with CMake and tell CMake to generate an Eclipse project file, like so: cmake -G "Eclipse CDT4 - Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Debug" -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;PowerPC;CBackend" /home/renato/llvm-sources You'll need to modify