similar to: [LLVMdev] r107943 / r107947 break i386 in Darwin.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] r107943 / r107947 break i386 in Darwin."

2010 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] r107943 / r107947 break i386 in Darwin.
It gave me some hard time, but I managed to build a reduced show case: Must be compile in i386: clang -arch i386 -o crash TestAppDelegate.c ./crash Segmentation Fault -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TestAppDelegate.c Type: application/octet-stream Size: 657 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2010 Apr 26
3
[LLVMdev] r102300 breaks Obj-C codegen on Darwin x86
After commit 102300, any obj-c software compiled with clang crashes at launch time with the following stack trace. Reverting this specific commit fix the issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date/Time: 2010-04-26 10:07:01.630 +0200 OS Version: Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573) Report Version: 6 Interval Since Last Report:
2010 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] r102300 breaks Obj-C codegen on Darwin x86
I managed to build a reduced test case: ================== foo.m ================== #include <Foundation/Foundation.h> @interface BaseNode : NSObject <NSCoding, NSCopying> { } @end @implementation BaseNode @end int main(int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } ========================================== # clang -o foo -arch i386 -framework Foundation foo.m foo.m:8:1: warning:
2008 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] build on windows
Hi Jean-Daniel, thank for ur fast answer, i have fixed this error, another function was defined inside llvm source code. So, my only problem now is, I cannot create the file "configure.lib" (belongs to project "Configure"). I can build this project without error, but it didn't generate the lib data ?! Can you build this file ? if yes, I will be very happy if you send it to
2008 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] build on windows
AFAK, the Configuration project does not generate any output. It just patch and generate some required header file. Le 1 juil. 08 à 17:32, Le Anh Quang a écrit : > Hi Jean-Daniel, > thank for ur fast answer, i have fixed this error, another function > was > defined inside llvm source code. > So, my only problem now is, I cannot create the file "configure.lib" >
2019 Jul 12
1
[bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Would you like to try with 2.3.7? It was released today. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 12/07/2019 17:05 Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot
2019 Jul 12
2
[bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event
Hi, I'm playing with the new events, and encounter some issues: First the 'auth_request_finished' event is documented as having a 'successful' field, but in the code, the field is defined as 'success' (e->add_str("success", "yes")). But more important, in the function "auth_request_success_continue()" (auth/auth-request.c:288),
2008 Jul 01
3
[LLVMdev] build on windows
Hi Jean-Daniel, Thank I use VC++ 9 (express version). I have also an error in TableGen: The "strtoll" could not be found under win32. Have you fixed it ? Regards Quang -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Jean-Daniel Dupas Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juni 2008 22:00 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List
2019 Jul 23
5
submission configuration issues
Hello, I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. I have configured the submission service as follow: submission_host = smtp.example.com submission_relay_host = localhost submission_relay_port = 8587 submission_relay_rawlog_dir = /var/log/dovecot/ submission_relay_trusted = yes My main issue is that until I login, dovecot-submission won't connect to the backend and query the
2008 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] build on windows
Not this one, I have a different error here. One related to hasmap and pair templates. I will check this on my Windows machine later. Le 1 juil. 08 à 16:44, Le Anh Quang a écrit : > Hi Jean-Daniel, > Thank > I use VC++ 9 (express version). I have also an error in TableGen: The > "strtoll" could not be found under win32. Have you fixed it ? > > Regards > Quang
2019 Jul 27
2
submission configuration issues
> Le 27 juil. 2019 ? 14:30, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> a ?crit : > > On 23/07/2019 17:13, Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. >> >> I have configured the submission service as follow: >> >> submission_host = smtp.example.com >>
2019 Jul 10
1
Dovecot behind Load Balancer
Il 10/07/19 11:44, Jean-Daniel Dupas ha scritto: > >> Le 10 juil. 2019 ? 10:24, Paolo Daniele via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> a ?crit : >> >> >> Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: >>>> On 12/06/2019 20:02 Paolo Daniele via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>
2014 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] LLD's software architecture (update)
Well, it does have a Registry& that's defined in Reader.h. But that can be forward declared (and apparently is in some of the other headers it includes. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Andreas Wendleder < andreas.wendleder at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi > > - passes depend on Reader and Writer >> > > That's an easy one. Compile tested on Windows with
2014 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] LLD's software architecture (update)
Yes, but if you look in LayoutPasses.c, it calls registry.referenceKindToString(..), so it does need the definition.. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <mailing at xenonium.com> wrote: > Using forward-declaration would not fix the layer violation. > > Le 10 juil. 2014 à 13:10, Bas van den Berg <b.van.den.berg.nl at gmail.com> > a écrit : > > Well,
2009 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVMContext: Suggestions for API Changes
Le 15 juil. 09 à 19:07, Owen Anderson a écrit : > > On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:53 AM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Owen Anderson wrote: >>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:44 AM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> 1) If technically possible, add the new API first, get it working, >>>> email >>>> llvmdev describing the old and new APIs, provide some
2019 Jul 10
7
Dovecot behind Load Balancer
Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: >> On 12/06/2019 20:02 Paolo Daniele via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> i've a question for you. >> I've two dovecot imap/pop server behind a zen load balancer. >> Load balancing is made by lx4nat so the public ip address of my load balancer contact directly the dovecot
2017 Jul 07
5
Web server files ownership?
Hi, I have a series of websites hosted on two CentOS 7 servers, using Apache virtual hosts. One of these servers is a "sandbox" machine, to test things and to fiddle around. On the sandbox server, I have a few dummy websites I'm hosting. # ls /var/www/html/ default phpinfo slackbox-mail slackbox-site unixbox-mail unixbox-site Since Apache is running as system user
2012 Nov 28
3
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
On 11/28/2012 03:47 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 28 nov. 2012 à 15:07, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are >> >> 168785,
2013 Oct 14
3
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
I switched my Common Lisp compiler to use MCJIT on the weekend and ran into a weird problem compiling one particular function. It crashes with an EXC_BAD_ACCESS error in MCJIT::finalizeObject when calling processFDE. The weird part is that the function does not appear to do anything special and I've whittled it down to the minimum size that still causes the crash. If I remove even one
2004 Jul 05
3
2.2.3a connection failure from XP to 10.3.4
Hello from a neophyte! Is there a diagnostic programme which can be run to determine if there are any faults in Samba 2.2.3a? I cannot connect from Win XP to my rev/b iMac (suddenly, maybe 'upgrade' to 10.3.4 had some effect) and the smb crashlog (shown below) has a pile of stuff which is incomprehensible to me. Secondly, how does one upgrade to another version of Samba and is this