similar to: [LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C

Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> writes: > what about > #if !defined(__cplusplus) || defined(__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS) > in front of the constant macros for visual c to emulate > the behaviour of stdint.h more precisely? What is this good for? The purpose of DataTypes.h is to provide the pieces LLVM needs and the platform lacks. Reimplementing some missing header file is

Hi, I have been working towards developing compiler optimization tools targeting multi core processors while using LLVM IR as the starting point and building on top of the analysis and optimization passes available in the llvm source. Recently, I looked into Open64 and its intermediate representation WHIRL. Documentation for developers to use Open64 seems to be inadequate (when compared to LLVM

Testing for __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS has the advantage that you are forced to define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS on win32. If you then switch to another platform the project still compiles. -Jochen

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization phases, Inline for aggressive inline opt. LNO for loop opt, WOPT for machine independent opt(

Hi! In DataTypes.h (generated from DataTypes.cmake) there is an extra code path for Visual C. This can produce macro redefinitions for INT8_MAX, INT8_MIN etc. since other headers may also define them. Therefore please protect the macros like INT8_C etc. Also it would be nice if the auto-generated HAVE_STDINT_H and HAVE_INTTYPES_H would be used also for Visual C since it is possible to add them

>>> What's that extra code path? >>> >>> >> #ifndef _MSC_VER >> ... >> #else /* _MSC_VER */ >> /* Visual C++ doesn't provide standard integer headers, but it does provide >> built-in data types. */ >> >> ... extra code path ... >> >> #endif >> > Sorry, that doesn't show an extra

[please CC the llvm mailing list] Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> writes: >> What's that extra code path? >> > > #ifndef _MSC_VER > ... > #else /* _MSC_VER */ > /* Visual C++ doesn't provide standard integer headers, but it does provide > built-in data types. */ > > ... extra code path ... > > #endif Sorry, that doesn't

Hi! Of course nobody wants to implement unicode support for windows because windows should support an utf8-locale and windows is obsolete anyway ;-) But there is a simple solution: use boost::filesystem::path everywhere you use file names and paths, for example in clang::FileManager::getFile. With version 3 opening a file is easy: std::fstream file(path.c_str()). Internally

On Nov 25, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> wrote: > Hi! > > Of course nobody wants to implement unicode support for windows > because windows should support an utf8-locale and windows is obsolete > anyway ;-) > > But there is a simple solution: use boost::filesystem::path everywhere you > use file names and paths, for example in

Hi! when compiling projects using llvm 2.9 and ms vc 10 I get these warnings: 1>e:\Jochen\Lib\lib\include\llvm/Use.h(218): warning C4624: 'llvm::AugmentedUse' : destructor could not be generated because a base class destructor is inaccessible 1>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\include\stdint.h(72): warning C4005: 'INT8_MIN' : macro redefinition

On 25.11.2010 23:56, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Nov 25, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de > <mailto:j.wilhelmy at arcor.de>> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Of course nobody wants to implement unicode support for windows >> because windows should support an utf8-locale and windows is obsolete >> anyway ;-) >> >> But

Hi! > sin/cos etc should already be handled by lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp. > Thanks for the hint and it works! Now I have a new Problem: I have this function: float foo(float a, float b) { float x = a * b * 0.0f; return cos(0.5) * sin(0.5) * x; }; after compiling it with clang (cpp mode) and renaming _ZSt3sinf to sin and _ZSt3cosf to cos I get the following: define

Now I have -DLLVM_INCLUDE_EXAMPLES:BOOL=OFF but Kaleidoscope is still there and selected for build (-G "Visual Studio 9 2008") -Jochen

Hi! Is it possible that you add an example how to write a .o with llvm? Just like examples/ModuleMaker but instead of printing to stdout writing a .o file as starting point for the new MC functionality. -Jochen

On 3 March 2010 11:56, Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> wrote: > > the sin and cos calls are folded, but not the mul by zero. > Is x*0 => 0 true if isnan(x)? And cos(x)*sin(x) makes me desperately want to fold it to sin(2*x)/2, but I suppose that's not allowed either.

>> Hi! >> >> before InstCombine (llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass()) I have >> a trunc from i8 to i1 and then a select: >> >> %45 = load i8* @myGlobal, align 1 >> %tobool = trunc i8 %45 to i1 >> %cond = select i1 %tobool, float 1.000000e+00, float -1.000000e+00 >> >> after instCombine I have: >> >> %29 = load i8*

Am 29.12.2011 19:52, schrieb Reid Kleckner: > I think Chris is saying that the and is necessary because with your i1 > trunc you're ignoring all of the high bits. The and implements that. > If you don't want this behavior, don't generate the trunc in the > first place and just compare the full width to zero. But if a backend sees trunc from i8 to i1 it should know

Hello Jochen- Your expectation is incorrect, I'm afraid. Typically this would be expanded to something like this: … %cmp = … br i1 %cmp, label %ternary.true, label %ternary.false ternary.true: %truevalue = … br label %ternary.end ternary.false: %falsevalue = … br label %ternary.end ternary.end: %value = phi %type [%truevalue, %ternary.true], [%falsevalue,

Hi! In the llvm-doc is the following: Also, since many platforms define their ABIs in terms of C, and since LLVM is lower-level than C, front-ends currently must emit platform-specific IR in order to have the result conform to the platform ABI. Can you give an example for this except system calls (which e.g. on windows use a different calling convention)? If you write your own operating

Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> writes: > Is it possible that you add an example how to write a .o with llvm? +1