Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C"
2010 Jun 24
1
[LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C
[please CC the llvm mailing list]
Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> writes:
>> What's that extra code path?
>>
>
> #ifndef _MSC_VER
> ...
> #else /* _MSC_VER */
> /* Visual C++ doesn't provide standard integer headers, but it does provide
> built-in data types. */
>
> ... extra code path ...
>
> #endif
Sorry, that doesn't
2010 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C
>>> What's that extra code path?
>>>
>>>
>> #ifndef _MSC_VER
>> ...
>> #else /* _MSC_VER */
>> /* Visual C++ doesn't provide standard integer headers, but it does provide
>> built-in data types. */
>>
>> ... extra code path ...
>>
>> #endif
>>
> Sorry, that doesn't show an extra
2004 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] Hardcoded HAVE_* defines in the DataTypes.h include file
Hi
I noticed that these defines (line 35 to 37) are hardcoded in the
DataTypes.h include file:
----------------
#define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1
#define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
#define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
----------------
Shouldn't they have be defined by the configure script into
llvm/Config/config.h?
Henrik
_________________________________________________________________
Undg� pop-ups med MSN Toolbar
2004 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Hardcoded HAVE_* defines in the DataTypes.h include file
Henrik Bach wrote:
> Hi
>
> I noticed that these defines (line 35 to 37) are hardcoded in the
> DataTypes.h include file:
> ----------------
> #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1
> #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
> #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
> ----------------
>
> Shouldn't they have be defined by the configure script into
> llvm/Config/config.h?
These lines are set by
2011 May 25
1
[LLVMdev] ms vc 10 warnings
Hi!
when compiling projects using llvm 2.9 and ms vc 10 I get these warnings:
1>e:\Jochen\Lib\lib\include\llvm/Use.h(218): warning C4624:
'llvm::AugmentedUse' : destructor could not be generated because a base
class destructor is inaccessible
1>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0\VC\include\stdint.h(72): warning C4005: 'INT8_MIN' : macro redefinition
2004 Jul 14
1
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (first use this function)
Hi
By manipulating a #define for G++ I've managed to compile int64_t type with
ostream.
Now, I'm stopped by some to me unknown constants:
-----------------------------------
Compiling Constants.cpp
Constants.cpp: In static member function `static bool
llvm::ConstantSInt::isValueValidForType(const llvm::Type*, long long
int)':
Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared(firstuse this function)
>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>
>Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT)
>
>There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments
>protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef
>to include internix.
>
Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting
LLVM 1.2), so I'm not
2009 Aug 27
1
[LLVMdev] A patch for refine the cmake system and also configure
>
> What do you want to improve exactly? Do you experience
> problems?
>
not only iterator.h but also DataTypes.h
I also put back iterator.h because at the trunk of llvm, iterator.h.in
and iterator.h.cmake still there:(
My improvement is now we didn't to generate DataTyes.h,
we just need to generate config.h,
And everything is configured at config.h, but not in seperate files.:)
2009 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] A patch for refine the cmake system and also configure
Hi Yonggang!
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyongg... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken
> the buildbot system.
> So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time.
> Also, this patch add two new file
> iterator.h
> and
> DataTypes.h
What do you want to improve exactly? Do you experience
2009 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] A patch for refine the cmake system and also configure
Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken
the buildbot system.
So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time.
Also, this patch add two new file
iterator.h
and
DataTypes.h
for the reason that patch doesn't support for svn's rename mechanics.
So I just add these two file and doesn't delete the old history files
Because I doesn't get
2016 Jun 20
2
Quality of LLVM headers
Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:05:18PM +0000, Paweł Bylica via llvm-dev wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016, 17:57 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at bec.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 03:24:22PM +0000, Paweł Bylica via llvm-dev wrote:
>> > > Hi LLVM,
>> > >
>>
2005 May 12
2
Problem configuring speex 1.1.8
Can you send me the config.log?
Jean-Marc
Le vendredi 13 mai 2005 ? 00:16 +0200, Pierre a ?crit :
> Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > What platform (OS, compiler/version)
>
> GNU/Linux
> kernel 2.6.11.8
> gcc 3.4.3
>
> > Also, does it work with no options.
>
> No, I just tried with just "./configure" and I have the same error.
>
>
--
Jean-Marc
2010 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C
Hi!
what about
#if !defined(__cplusplus) || defined(__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
in front of the constant macros for visual c to emulate
the behaviour of stdint.h more precisely?
-Jochen
2012 Feb 07
5
[PATCH] Remove even more CPP hackery
On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Dave Yeo wrote:
>
>> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
>> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing
>> and that klibc contains so many improvements I think this is exceptable.
>
> Sorry Dave, I can't do that. Or rather sorry, the patch
2009 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] Macro redefinitions
In DataTypes.h starting on line 121 are these lines:
#define INT8_C(C) C
#define UINT8_C(C) C
#define INT16_C(C) C
#define UINT16_C(C) C
#define INT32_C(C) C
#define UINT32_C(C) C ## U
#define INT64_C(C) ((int64_t) C ## LL)
#define UINT64_C(C) ((uint64_t) C ## ULL)
They are conflicting with the cstdint when we have updated headers in
our MSVC build. I could have sworn I talked about this
2015 Jul 05
3
[PATCH speexdsp] Don't rely on HAVE_STDINT_H et al. being defined
From: Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com>
Not everyone who includes speexdsp_config_types.h will have a test
which defines those, and if we've chosen to use the stdint types at
configure time then we know exactly which header(s) are available, so
just choose the best one then and generate the header to use it.
This patch, including the above text, is copied from a commit
2010 Jul 03
1
[LLVMdev] DataTypes.h for Visual C
Testing for __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
has the advantage that you are forced to define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
on win32. If you then switch to another platform the project still compiles.
-Jochen
2004 Aug 06
3
ices2 compilations problems
Hi, I have an Ices2 comp problem, it can't find libshout.
I have installed Libshout 2.0 in /home/Darkmeteor
the configure line I'm using for ices2 is :
./configure --prefix=/home/Darkmeteor --with-ogg-prefix=/home/Darkmeteor --with-vorbis-prefix=/home/Darkmeteor --with-shout-prefix=/home/Darkmeteor
Problem :
checking for Ogg... yes
checking for Vorbis... yes
checking for Shout... no
2014 Sep 26
1
configure: error: linking to Fortran libraries from C fails
Hi all,
Nice one for a Friday afternoon ...
I'm trying to follow this section of the manual :
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Using-Undefined-Behaviour-Sanitizer
to build R-devel (as of a few hours ago: rev 66684) with
-fsanitize=undefined,address.
My OS is Linux Mint Debian Edition. To get gcc-4.9 I added Debian
testing to my apt sources and ran :
sudo
2006 Apr 17
3
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
Hi again,
I wrote:
> > I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make
> > unknown = OpenBSD and Unix
>
> Have you looked at ./config.log. ./configure creates this as it runs
> as a trace of the path it took through ./configure. Work backwards
> from the end to find out what it didn't like.
I remember SourceForge's compile farm has an OpenBSD x86