Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [PATCH] doc: fix Makefile in 'Writing an LLVM Pass' page"
2010 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] [RESEND] [PATCH] doc: fix Makefile in 'Writing an LLVM Pass' page
This makes example Makefile a lot more like actual
lib/Transforms/Hello/Makefile, and prevents a lot of errors like "Assertion
`Inserted && "Pass registered multiple times!"' failed":
http://www.google.com/search?q="Assertion+`Inserted+%26%26+"Pass+registered+multiple+times!"'+failed"&qscrl=1
Gregory
-------------- next
2012 Dec 08
4
read.table()
Hi List,
I have spent more than 30 minutes, but failed to read in this file using the read.table() function. I could not figure out how to fix the following error.
Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, : line 1 did not have 6 elements
Any help would be be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradip Muhuri
####### below is the reproducible example
xd1 <-
2013 May 06
2
Keyword limit?
Running into a weird issue in a mailbox that has 26+ keywords.
In one session, I do this:
S: 2 SELECT "INBOX" (QRESYNC (1255685337 78608 [...uids...]))
S: [...]
S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 78608] Highest
S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1255685337] UIDs valid
S: 2 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
C: 3 UID STORE 48386 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 78608) +FLAGS AAAAAAAA
S: * 8 FETCH (UID 48386 MODSEQ (78609) FLAGS
2012 Nov 24
3
Help!!!!!
Dear R users.
I am little lost and i need your help.
I have such data.
DATE i Symptomes t
1 2009-04-24 Mexique 0 14358
2 2009-04-24 usa 0 14358
3 2009-04-26 Mexique 18 14360
4 2009-04-26 usa 100 14360
5 2009-04-27 Canada 6 14361
6 2009-04-27
2009 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
> I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin
> 1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4
>
> llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll
Cygwin does not support dynamic linking (as any windows target).
For the moment - you can just build tools and not the runtime via
"make tools-only".
--
With best
2010 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Function code size estimation
Hello,
I am working on a pass that finds identical basic blocks and abstracts
them into functions, in order to reduce code size.
To decide, whether particular basic block group is worth factoring
out, I want to estimate code size of some function that uses one of
basic blocks in question 'as is', and after factoring the basic block
into a new function.
Can you please suggest a proper
2010 Jun 04
1
[LLVMdev] Function code size estimation
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Gregory Petrosyan
> <gregory.petrosyan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am working on a pass that finds identical basic blocks and abstracts
>> them into functions, in order to reduce code size.
>>
>> To decide, whether
2018 Jun 04
4
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Mon, 04 Jun 2018 04:59:55 +0200
Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> Perhaps when everyone has cooled down a little we can get the Samba
> wiki page updated with this information?
Sorry, but no, I don't think this is a good idea (yet), most distros do
not have a new enough version of chrony for it to work. Put it on the
Samba wiki that you can use chrony instead of
2010 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] libcalls test fails to run
This is what I get while trying to run 'make TEST=libcalls' in the top dir of
test-suite:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests'
make[3]: Entering directory
2009 Jun 05
1
Antialiasing plots and text on different devices
I have a question about antialiasing when R generates bitmaps. (This follows
a thread on the ggplot2 mailing list.)
I mostly use R on Linux, although I sometimes use it in Mac and Windows as
well. On Linux, I've found that plotting shapes 15-18 via cairo results in
bad-looking output. The points are not antialiased, and they are jagged and
misshapen. Plots generated in Windows also aren't
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
Hi,
I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin
1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4
llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld:
warning: cannot find entry symbol __cygwin_dll_entry at 12; defaulting to
62fc1000
2010 Feb 06
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] FoldingSetNodeID: use MurmurHash2 instead of SuperFastHash
Some additional info can be found at:
http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MurmurHash
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/hash_functions.aspx
as well as in the patch description itself. Patch and benchmark attached.
Gregory
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2010 May 31
2
Queue ringall problem.
This is the problem:
Call coming into a queue in ringall strategy, if a member (SIP) of the
queue is busy when entering the queue, and this member comes free
after a little time, the member never rings..
How to solve this?
I changed all parameters of the queue with no results...
Wath i need:
If one member of the queue is busy when a new call come in to the
queue, this member can hangup and
2009 Dec 14
1
[LLVMdev] Problem running 2.6 test-suite on cygwin
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Anton Korobeynikov
<anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
>> It looks to me that this:
>>
>> make[4]: *** No rule to make target `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.rbc',
>> needed by `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.bc'. Stop.
> Well, I have no idea then. makefiles of testsuite are well-known for
> such erratic behavior :(
For the
2010 Jan 04
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/bullet: fix build in case $LLVM_SRC_ROOT != $LLVM_OBJ_ROOT
Index: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile
===================================================================
--- MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile (revision 92478)
+++ MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
LEVEL = ../../../
PROG = bullet
-CPPFLAGS += -Iinclude -DNO_TIME
+CPPFLAGS += -I$(PROJ_SRC_DIR)/include -DNO_TIME
LDFLAGS = -lstdc++
include
2010 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:43:33PM +0300, Gregory Petrosyan wrote:
> 'make TEST=example' works, 'make TEST=jit' and 'make' work too. Any ideas about what is going wrong here?
No idea why this stuff was there...
Index: TEST.libcalls.Makefile
===================================================================
--- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92512)
+++
2010 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Function code size estimation
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Gregory Petrosyan
<gregory.petrosyan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a pass that finds identical basic blocks and abstracts
> them into functions, in order to reduce code size.
>
> To decide, whether particular basic block group is worth factoring
> out, I want to estimate code size of some function that uses one of
>
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Anton Korobeynikov
<anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
>> I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin
>> 1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4
>>
>> llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll
> Cygwin does not support dynamic linking (as any windows target).
2010 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:30:41AM -0600, David Greene wrote:
> > I've managed to get my pass listed in 'opt -help' only after removing opt
> > subdir from objdir and running make again. Re-configuring LLVM also does
>
> It sounds like the dependencies for your pass are not correct. Where
> did you put it in the LLVM tree and how did you change the Makefiles?
2010 Feb 11
3
[LLVMdev] FoldingSet #collisions comparison
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:31:23AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Gregory Petrosyan wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:51:15PM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> >>While I've not reviewed the patch in too much detail, it looks
> >>promising. Can you run some end-to-end benchmarks to make sure that
> >>cache pressure in the