similar to: [LLVMdev] Assertion when loading bitcode

>> I can cross-compile LLVM-2.5 to ARM and run lli on a simulator in debug >> mode . However, when I now compile with optimization enabled, lli >> triggers an assertion when loading bitcode files. The assertion looks >> like this : >are you not able to use a more recent version of LLVM like LLVM-2.7? I tried out LLVM-2.7. It also triggers an assertion. This

I missed out some lines of the error message. They are: checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/VIREMENT/src_virement/build/BuildTools' make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make[1]: Leaving

How does one cross compile llvm ? When I attempt to cross compile I get  : ................................................ ............................................... configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile.common config.status: executing setup commands config.status: executing Makefile commands config.status: executing lib/Makefile commands config.status:

Hello Everyone, I can cross-compile LLVM-2.5 to ARM and run lli on a simulator in debug mode . However, when I now compile with optimization enabled, lli triggers an assertion when loading bitcode files. The assertion looks like this : lli: /home/Virement/llvm/llvm-2.5-linux/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:199: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X

I was able to use your scripts to build� llvm and llvm-gcc successfully. But when i try to link to llvm libraries i get the following : ......................... .......................... /arm-2007q3/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: /arm-llvm/llvm-project/i686-pc-linux-gnu/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/llvm/lib/LLVMXCore.o: Relocations in generic

>>>>> I am using GCC 4.3.2 ( Debian 4.3.2-1.1) on x86. I will try out a different compiler. I tried out Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q1-203 (GCC 4.3.3). I still can't get lli to run. This time the error is like this: 0 lli 0x00651128 1 lli 0x00651960 2 libc.so.6 0x40212600 __default_sa_restorer_v1 + 0 3 lli 0x00282ef0 4 lli 0x00283cec

----- Original Message ----- From: "Misha Brukman" To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] CROSS COMPILING LLVM Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:41:17 -0400 2009/6/14 hannibal hannibal I was able to use your scripts to build  llvm and llvm-gcc successfully. But when i try to link to llvm libraries i get the following : .........................

llvm-config can now find 'which' but I still get the same error. Thanks hannibal ----- Original Message ----- From: "Török Edwin" To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] undefined references in llvm Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:27:17 +0300 On 2009-06-16 14:05, hannibal hannibal wrote: > > Hello EveryOne, > > I am building customized

hannibal hannibal wrote: > I get the following error when I try to run arm lli on QEMU: > > lli: llvm-arm/src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:197: typename bidirectional_iterator<NodeTy, int>::reference llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator*() const [with NodeTy = llvm::RecyclerStruct]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) != 0 && "Dereferencing end()!"'

I get the following error when I try to run arm lli on QEMU: lli: llvm-arm/src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:197: typename bidirectional_iterator<NodeTy, int>::reference llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator*() const [with NodeTy = llvm::RecyclerStruct]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) != 0 && "Dereferencing end()!"' failed. 0 lli 0x006abbfc Stack dump: 0.

Hello EveryOne, I am building customized tools for ARM using a crosscomplier. I am currently building a tool similar to lli but it only jits code. I enabled jit when I was configuring LLVM. On linking my code with help from llvm-config to the libraries I get this error: Can't exec "which": No such file or directory at llvm2/bin/llvm-config line 69. Use of uninitialized value in

Hello all, I am working with someone else's LLVM code, which is about 8 months old. Part of this pass involves AliasAnalysis, and I'm getting the above assertion when the pass completes. The dump is as follows: -------------------------------- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xf7fdf430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt #0 0xf7fdf430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xf602e921 in

Yes, it is a pass. Here is a very general overview of the file structure as far as the AA is concerned. LLVM is not my strong-suit, I do hardware simulators, not compilers. using namespace llvm; char RelRecovery::ID = 0; static RegisterPass<RelRecovery> X("relRecovery", "Reliability transformation for lightweight recovery"); void

Hi! In some cases the use of blockaddress() crashes llc. I've attached two test-cases, one that crashes and for reference a slightly modified one (just 2 lines are commented) that works. I compile the files with # llvm-as test_crash.ll -o - | llc -f -o temp.s - and get 0 llc 0x0000000000c6ab6f 1 llc 0x0000000000c6b38d 2 libpthread.so.0 0x00007feccd2270f0 3

Hi, I'm trying to build llvm on a Solaris/Sparc machine. I get many undefined symbols during the link phase of opt. The link command being run is below. It is identical to the link command that gets run and works on an x86 host. Thanks, Tarun g++ -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/include -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt

Griffin Wright wrote: > > Hello all, > > I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, > please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but > I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for > the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm > desperate here.

How do I compilellvm libraries with static versions of libstdc++, libgcc, etc. Thanks Hannibal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091217/f03b9020/attachment.html>

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux (2.2.19) machine is running Samba 2.2.2 as a PDC. The clients are Win2K SP2. A user accesses several Excel 2000 files on a share. This sometimes results in long(ish) delays (the user reports around 10 seconds, although this could be longer) and the message from Excel that the file is in use and can only be read. After closing and re-opening the file,

Hello all, I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm desperate here. I have a getAnalysisUsage method which does the following

It also occurs on several (different) test cases. I have founded that assershion rises in void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Value *V); Code from function: // All callbacks, weak references, and assertingVHs should be dropped by now. if (V->HasValueHandle) { #ifndef NDEBUG // Only in +Asserts mode... dbgs() << "While deleting: " << *V->getType()