similar to: [LLVMdev] Backend for Harvard Architecture

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > I believe what you want is documented here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#datalayout > Just a note, since it might be a bug on the backend or documentation. It says on the documentation that size for f is either 32 or 64, however, sparc has 64 and 128. -- PMatos

Hi, I am starting to learn rails and I went through the guide and a couple of tutorials. Even though I understand controllers or at least I can use them I can''t see yet the whole picture. Why do you need several controllers for a single application? If a controller is just a class whose methods interface with models and views, why not have a single controller for the whole application?

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 14:32 Paulo Matos <pmatos at linki.tools wrote: > > > On 12 February 2019 18:59:21 CET, Mikhail Ramalho < > mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> wrote: > >I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so > >clang > >would have to be released with Z3's license. > > I don't think that's a problem. You are not

Hi all, I am running an smbclient 3.4.7 on a ubuntu server 10.04. This is a local network whose hostnames in the network are setup manually through /etc/hosts. Zeus is a server which contains a music share which I am trying to access. I haven't created any users or passwords. The idea is that anyone within the local network should be able to access the share with read permissions, so I

Hi, I have setup postfix master.cf to use dovecot-lda to deliver (using -m) all messages to PreInbox: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${sender} -a ${recipient} -d ${user}@${nexthop} -m PreINBOX And enabled lda_mailbox_autocreate. The message I have now it: Aug 27 10:02:29 lda(): Info:

Fixing llvm-dev at llvm.org to llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:27 AM Thomas Lively <tlively at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for your work on this, Paulo! > > Here's some more detail about how function pointers work today in the > WebAssembly backend and how they differ from the `funcref` Paulo is > working on. > > Today in the WebAssembly

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Paulo J. Matos <pocmatos at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: >> I believe what you want is documented here: >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#datalayout >> > > Just a note, since it might be a bug on the backend or documentation. > It says on the

Hi, I have setup message filtering and for example, I might move a message which a given sender to folder special/. This folder is created and shows up twice in INBOX/special/ and special/. They are however exactly the same folder. If I subscribe to one I am automatically subscribed to the other and viceversa. Not too happy with this configuration. I have a feeling this is related to

Hi all, I have a running dovecot with: $ dovecot -n # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 4.1.0-x86_64-linode59 x86_64 Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) ext4 auth_debug = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = yes default_internal_user = root imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep mail_debug = yes

Hello, I am trying to find out where the complete documentation for the TargetDescription string documentation is. I am reading the tutorial and looking at the sparc backend at the same time and there are some discrepancies. Therefore the documentation would be extremely valuable but I can't seem to find it. In the tutorial it shows the string "E-p:32:32-f128:128:128", but the real

Hi all, I have a running dovecot with: $ dovecot -n # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 4.1.0-x86_64-linode59 x86_64 Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) ext4 auth_debug = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = yes default_internal_user = root imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep mail_debug = yes

Am 08.03.2011 um 19:59 schrieb Ken Dyck: > If you are interested, I can send you a patch of the changes that I > made to the 2.8 release for a backend that targets a 24-bit > word-addressable DSP, but it is quite rough and it includes changes in > which you probably aren't interested (support for non-power-of-2 > integer sizes and some other bug fixes). I would be interested

Hello, Is there any reason why the /docs (and its subdirectories) in the llvm webpage are dead? Thanks, -- PMatos

I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so clang would have to be released with Z3's license. On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 09:24 Roman Lebedev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:13 PM Paulo Matos via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to run scan-build

Hello Hal, > Add this information to DataLayout and to use that information in relevant places. This sounds like a much better/cleaner idea, thanks! On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 07/11/2017 12:54 AM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hello all, I’m looking into solving an AVR-specific issue and would love > to hear

Please check permissions as this sounds like a permissions issue m On 27/08/2015 12:08 PM, "Paulo Matos" <paulo at matos-sorge.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have setup postfix master.cf to use dovecot-lda to deliver (using -m) > all messages to PreInbox: > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail

Hi, I've been reading the docs, including "Creating an LLVM project", and I was wondering if this setup also applies to backends. On one hand it would be good if it did because it would allow one to develop a backend without tracking the LLVM sources with it. If it is not possible (and one follows the instruction of the backend documentation "Writing an LLVM Compiler

My experience of having the address space for functions (or function pointers) in the DataLayout i that when the .ll file is parsed we need to parse the DataLayout before any function declarations. That is needed because we want to attribute the functions with correct address space (according to DataLayout) when inserting them in the symbol table. An alternative would be to update address space

On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:04 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Ken Dyck wrote: > > > Does anybody have any tips for generating spills/reloads for large > > non-vector registers? > > [snip] > > > This is quite simple to handle. A register > MachineOperand has a subreg field for this > purpose. It is used to pick out subregisters

Hi Daniel, I want to clarify that our analysis is not based on CFL-reachability. We apply CFL-reachability to matching context information where the exist from a function to a call-site must match the entry from the corresponding call-site. The problem is a simple balanced parentheses problem in CFL-reachability, and it can be computed efficiently. The paper you mentioned is a very nice paper