similar to: [LLVMdev] does llvm have some way to get the size of data type

mike-m, is there any way to configure doxygen to produce human-readable anchors? They might have avoided the duplication on this thread, since Erick and John could have seen that I was linking to their suggestions. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > Try http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ConstantExpr.html#a2ea738dfa37ea93c71756be89ba8d92

Try http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ConstantExpr.html#a2ea738dfa37ea93c71756be89ba8d92 or http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1TargetData.html#64c154a7844026e76e18f792ee4ad4b3 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gang.Yao <ttoole9 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi: > > just like the c function sizeof(). I would avoid the usage of the c > function call, and expect something like llvm

No anchor naming options that I can find. But I'll keep an eye out for things that may improve anchor readability. --mike-m On 2010-05-08, at 12:53 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > mike-m, is there any way to configure doxygen to produce > human-readable anchors? They might have avoided the duplication on > this thread, since Erick and John could have seen that I was linking > to

Hello! You can do this: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/SizeOf-OffsetOf-VariableSizedStructs.txt On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gang.Yao <ttoole9 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi: > > just like the c function sizeof(). I would avoid the usage of the c > function call, and expect something like llvm > intrinsic or some class providing this functionality. > > Does someone

Is there a way to get the size of a type in the IR assembly code? I know the size must be known since alloca and getelementptr both implicitly use it, but I don't see any way to get access to the size directly. I know my final compiler will have to get the size itself, but I'm just doing some simple tests directly in assembly now and am hoping there is an easy way to get the size of a

Thanks Duncan, Yes, it is a ConstantExpr! Thank you! Now trying to find a clue in ConstantExpr's functions to get that string :-) Regards, Welson On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Welson Sun, > > > Hi, if I have some LLVM code like this: > > > > @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8]

Hi, how can i correctly calculate the size of a member of a struct (including alignment etc)? This doesn't work : const StructType *STy = cast<StructType>(Ty); for (StructType::element_iterator I = STy->element_begin(), E = STy->element_end(); I != E; ++I) { usigned size =I->get()->getScalarSizeInBits(); //often

hi, i am writing a simple LLVM pass to analyze the Store instruction. my pass derives from InstVisitor class, and the method to handle Store instruction is like this: void MyPass::visitStoreInst(StoreInst &I) { ... } It is pretty simple to handle Store. however, in on test i got an instruction like below: store i8 %tmp5, i8* inttoptr (i32 301959828 to i8*) the second operand is

Ok, now it's arising another problem. IR code that I obtain is the following: i8* bitcast ([5 x i8] c"hello\00" to i8*) generated from instructions: ConstantExpr::getBitCast (ConstantDataArray::getString (getGlobalContext (), "hello"), PointerType::get (Type::getInt8Ty (getGlobalContext ()), 0)) but the LLC tool says: invalid cast opcode for cast from '[5 x i8]'

On 4/18/13 9:56 AM, Jun Koi wrote: > hi, > > i am writing a simple LLVM pass to analyze the Store instruction. > my pass derives from InstVisitor class, and the method to handle Store > instruction is like this: > > void MyPass::visitStoreInst(StoreInst &I) { > ... > } > > It is pretty simple to handle Store. however, in on test i got an > instruction like

Hello, I would just like to ask if it's possible to explicitly free allocas. This is because I need to call functions that take structs of different sizes as input, (possibly inside of loops) and I would rather avoid a stack overflow. If this is not possible, an alternate solution would be for me to allocate an array of bytes larger than all the struct types I may be using, and cast that

On 19/12/12 10:25, Alessio Giovanni Baroni wrote: > Ok, now it's arising another problem. IR code that I obtain is the following: > > i8* bitcast ([5 x i8] c"hello\00" to i8*) You need to put your "hello" in a (constant) global variable. You can then bitcast the address of the global to i8*. I suggest you compile some C code that makes use of the address of a

Because I need to convert an [4 x i8] type to i8* in the instantiation of a GlobalVariable. I have the follow declaration: %xxx = type { i8* } and I must emit the following variable: @yyy = linkonce_odr constant %xxx { [4 x i8] c"hello\00" }, but it's wrong. How do I do? 2012/12/18 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at

Dear all I have a data.frame like that : father mother num_daughter daughter 291 3906 0 NULL 275 4219 0 NULL 273 4236 1 49410 281 4163 1 49408 274 4226 1 49406 295 3869 2 49403 49404 287 4113 0 NULL 295 3871 1 49401 292 3895 4 49396 49397 49398 49399 291 3900 3 49392 How to read it into R and transform it like that: father mother num_daughter

Hi Reid, On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:08 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > The thing you're missing is that LLVM's primitive types have well known, > fixed sizes that are not target dependent. A ulong is 8 bytes. A uint is > 4 bytes. A ushort is 2 bytes. Etc. and always. Don't aligning rules make it hard to compute the size of a whole struct from the sizes of it's members?

Dear All I have a lot of files in a directory as follows: "02-03.txt" "03-04.txt" "04-05.txt" "05-06.txt" "06-07.txt" "07-08.txt" "08-09.txt" "09-10.txt" "G0.txt" "G1.txt" "raw_ped.txt" .......................... I want to read them into different objects according

I was shocked to find no RCS on SXCE 107. I needed it to update some RCS archives I had copied over. No problem - go to sunfreeware and copy it over. No OpenSolaris branch? The Solaris 10 package should work. Only the package install appears to complete and does not - as documented only in a log file, not on my screen. OK then, the source for RCS should be easily compiled and installed, I

Could anyone please explain to me why the following writes nothing into "all.Rout" file? If the "for" loop is removed, t.test output can be written into "all.out". Thanks in advance. Minghua Yao ...... zz <- file("all.Rout", open="wt") sink(zz) for(i in 1:n) { Cy3<-X[,2*i-1]; Cy5<-X[,2*i]; t.test(Cy3, Cy5)

Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2008-05-21, at 22:17, Talin wrote: > >> As I understand this, this issue and others like it all require a >> difficult step to be taken, which is to introduce the concept of a >> constant whose value is not known until code generation time or at >> least >> until the compilation target is fully known. These "late bound

Dear all: Plan 1: I want to do serval t-test means for different variables in a loop , so I want to add all results to an object then dump() them to an text. But I don't know how to append T-test result to the object? I have already plot the barplot and I want to know an elegant way to report raw result. Can anybody give me some pieces of advice? Yao He ????????????????????????? Master