similar to: [LLVMdev] doxygen redux

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] doxygen redux"

2010 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] doxygen redux
On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:54 AM, mike-m wrote: > Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. > > Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the
2010 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] doxygen redux
Excellent work, this greatly improves the clarity of the generated docs. I would love it if the inheritance diagrams were kept as they are and the collaboration diagrams were hidden under a knob. Thanks, John On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:54 AM, mike-m <mikem.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm > and clang source
2010 Apr 30
7
[LLVMdev] doxygen redux
Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the wins (IMHO) are the new style doesn't waste so much
2010 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] docs build (doxygen redux)
Need review on new docs build. The directory layout has changed, and the changes propagate through source, build, install and possible website levels. What follows is an overview of the changes and some reasoning behind them. [patch can be found under pr6613; you will need doxygen.sh, doxygen.patch, doxygen.txt] [read: doxygen.txt for full instructions] A build diagram is also available;
2010 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] doxygen redux
On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:54 AM, mike-m wrote: > I'm not sure how the project/community feels about collab-diagrams. > I find them exceedingly large and rarely useful. There are a couple > of options if changes in that area are desired: (1) disable collab- > diagrams. (2) make both class-inheritance and collab-diagrams hidden > under a javascript-knob which users can click
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] First-class debug info IR: MDLocation (redux)
> On 2015 Jan 13, at 11:13, Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > >> I suspect it would actually be *better* if I got all this in before >> the branch, since it'll make cherry-picking testcases easier. > > Excellent point, go for it. I missed the branch deadline, but I merged it in as of r226095. > --paulr > >> >>
2015 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] First-class debug info IR: MDLocation (redux)
Hi Paul, I'm not sure I see any reason to wait until after 3.6. More changes are incoming and it's better to get them over with sooner rather than spread out the pain. Thanks! -eric On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:52:48 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > Would you mind terribly waiting a week, until after 3.6 is forked? > > We're barely
2015 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] First-class debug info IR: MDLocation (redux)
I suspect it would actually be *better* if I got all this in before the branch, since it'll make cherry-picking testcases easier. However, these patches themselves (and I suspect a few more prep commits) don't actually move `MDLocation` into place -- it's not until then that all the testcase updates have to happen. I'm not convinced that (monster) commit will land by tomorrow :(.
2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] Doxygen: enable autobrief?
I am all for not having to add \brief. The more readable the comments are for someone not using doxygen the better. On May 8, 2015 2:06 PM, "Matthias Braun" <matze at braunis.de> wrote: > So far I've heard no objections, I'll wait a few more days and then change > the doxygen configuration and the recommendations in the coding standards. > I do not plan to remove
2005 Nov 15
1
[LLVMdev] doxygen docs
Chris Lattner wrote: >> I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to >> create pages for classes defined in anonymous namespaces in cpp files. >> I enabled options such as EXTRACT_ALL, EXTRACT_PRIVATE and >> EXTRACT_LOCAL, but no luck. How is the publicly available >> documentation generated? > > They are generated from the Makefile in
2013 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Help on making doxygen document
Dear Sir or Ms: My OS is ubuntu 12.04(AMD64). I have installed TexLive 2012, Graphviz 2.26.3, doxygen 1.7.6.1 without the dependence doxygen-latex.The version of LLVM I am working on is 3.2. My configure script is the following: ../llvm-3.2/configure --prefix=/home/me/mywork/sca/llvm/llvm-install2 --enable-targets=host-only --enable-debug-runtime --enable-assertions --enable-doxygen
2017 Apr 02
2
Which doxygen doc should I look into?
Thanks for the info, Philip. I will update the LLVM Programmer’s Manual first. Regards, chenwj Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj 2017-04-02 18:11 GMT+08:00 Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>: > Hi chenwj, > > http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h_source.html is the correct one. The > other two are remnants from older doxygen deployments.
2012 Jun 11
0
CEBA-2012:0718 CentOS 5 doxygen FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0718 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0718.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 72c425f77c5c39f7acf6e022521cc85b76c394784e93f04188e0681251e6c592 doxygen-1.4.7-2.i386.rpm 97ea811c40a83bf5c7f30efe5394769206c61deb045b41477e0f0f3d96762a42
2015 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] Doxygen: enable autobrief?
Getting rid of all the distracting \brief comment markers in our header files would be great! Note that we will also need to update our coding standards to no longer encourage them then. -- adrian > On May 3, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > > Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> writes: >> We just had some discussion in the IRC
2005 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] doxygen docs
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] doxygen build fails
Hi I've tried to get doxygen documentation by configuring with --enable-doxygen. Then 'make install' has been interrupted with message "error: configuration file /media/data/virtual/share/gsoc/build/docs/doxygen.cfg not found!". mikem, why did you remove a line "AC_CONFIG_FILES([docs/doxygen.cfg])" in autoconf/configure.ac [1] ? I've restored this line. Now
2020 Oct 01
2
When are Doxygen pages built?
Just a poke to see if anyone knows when the Doxygen pages are built. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Windfall Paul C. Anagnostopoulos ---------------------------------------------------------- Software 978 369-0839 www.windfall.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- My
2020 Jun 07
1
Navbar for documentation is broken in Doxygen 1.8.18
Hi, Here is a patch to update documentation to Doxygen 1.8.18 as the navbar is broken trying to use the latest Doxygen. Also seems we are missing documentation for last releases here: https://www.opus-codec.org/docs/ Best Regards Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 May 26
3
[LLVMdev] Doxygen: enable autobrief?
So, I'd love to not have to write '\brief' but that's not what this gives us sadly. The behavior of autobrief is that the brief snippet stops at the first '.' in the text. It doesn't matter if that '.' is part of code or anything else. The behavior of the '\brief' command is that the paragraph it marks is the brief comment, and the detailed one starts
2017 Jan 31
0
Duplicate doxygen disarray
Hi folks, I noticed that llvm.org currently hosts two instances of the doxygen API docs, [1] and [2]. Is that intentional or by accident? What's a bit vexing about this is that googling specific APIs always ends up on [2]. However, [2] hasn't been updated for a year now and [1] would be the correct hit. But /doxygen is Disallowed through robots.txt. Best, Philip [1]