similar to: [LLVMdev] Is alloca the only way to create a structure?

Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to be the bug I'm hitting. I applied the fix to my source and it didn't make a difference. Also further testing found me getting the same behavior with other SIMD instructions. The common factor is in each case, ECX is set to 0x7fffffff, and it's an operation using xmm ptr ecx+offset . Additionally, turning the optimization level passed to

Are you able to send any IR for others to reproduce this issue? On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to be the bug I'm hitting. I applied > the fix to my source and it didn't make a difference. > > Also further testing found me getting the same behavior with other SIMD > instructions.

I would like to know something different than that. How I can determine if the address at which data is stored is part of the heap or part of the stack. Regards, Nayden On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier at unine.ch>wrote: > >> On 08/07/2010 04:41 AM, Nayden Nedev wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am trying to modify

Hi, I am trying to modify visitStoreInst() function in Execution.cpp of LLVM 2.7 to do some extra things. How I can determine whether the stored variable is global or local for some function? Regards, Nayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100806/fba58a79/attachment.html>

I'm writing a front end for an existing interpreted language with slightly odd semantics for primitive values. Similar to the values in a database table, any value could be null, even for non-pointer types. For example a boolean variable could be true, false, or null. To model this behaviour, I'm passing an {i1, [type]} around for every numeric type. And using insertvalue / extractvalue

On Jan 12, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Talin wrote: > Here is the LangRef part of the patch. > +<p>The union type is used to represent a set of possible data types which can > + exist at a given location in memory (also known as an "untagged" > + union). [...] This wording is somewhat misleading; memory in LLVM has no types. How about: "A union type describes an

Thanks Nick, Unfortunately, that is indeed what I asked for but not what I really am looking for. My naive approach is to store symbol table entries as Value* objects so I can allocate global variables and alloca variables and place them into the symbol table and the rest of the code didn't need to know which kind they were, in general. Loads and Stores of these types (as well as other

Hi Can someone explain to me why we cant use uint64_t for extractvalue and insertvalue indices, while GEP on arrays can have indices of any integer type. Basically if I load an array with UINT_MAX+O (O>=2) elements, I can not extract its last element. Given this restriction I feel we have a bug here (uint64_t is passed as a unsigned). This cant happen because of the if (NumElements > 1024)

Oh, no. I should have been more clear. The patch was not rejected, just lost in the daily shuffle. I already have my employer's approval to send this upstream, so I will prepare a patch against trunk this morning. > I proposed a similar patch to LLVM (left circular shift) around 10/2011. > > Parts of my patch did make it into trunk about a year after, but others > > did not.

Here is the LangRef part of the patch. On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Talin wrote: > > I'm working on a new version of the patch. >> >> Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one giant >> patch that has everything, or a series of incremental patches? I can

I'm having an issue where a certain set of types and insert/extractvalue are producing the incorrect values. It appears as though extractvalue getting my sub-structure is not getting the correct data. I have these types: %outer = type { i32, %inner, i1 } %inner = type { double, i32 } The trouble is that when I have a value of type %outer then proceed to extract the components of the

You should be able to use the second alternative that Nick proposed: cast<PointerType*>(pointer_value->getType())->getElementType() Reid On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Curtis Faith <curtis at curtisfaith.com> wrote: > Thanks Nick, > Unfortunately, that is indeed what I asked for but not what I really am > looking for. > My naive approach is to store symbol table

I'm toying with benchmarks on my HLVM and am unable to get any performance improvement from optimization passes. Moreover, some of my programs generate a lot of redundant code (e.g. alloca a struct, store a struct into it and read only one field without using the rest of the struct) and this does not appear to be optimized away. I simply copied the use of PassManager from the Kaleidoscope

Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 19:56, David Greene via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> llvm.creal.* - Overloaded intrinsic to extract the real part of a >> complex value >> declare float @llvm.creal.c32(c32 %Val) >> declare double @llvm.creal.c64(c64 %Val) > > What are

On Thursday 19 February 2009 19:00:14 Jon Harrop wrote: > I'm toying with benchmarks on my HLVM and am unable to get any performance > improvement from optimization passes... I just disassembled some of the IR before and after optimization. This example function squares a complex number: let zsqr(r, i) = (r*r - i*i, 2*r*i) My compiler is generating: define fastcc i32 @zsqr({

On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Talin wrote: > I realize that most users of LLVM aren't affected by this, because most frontends aren't target-neutral, and thus know in advance how big a pointer is. At least, that's my impression. I believe that. > There's only a tiny handful of fairly esoteric cases which require selecting a target before you generate IR. Unfortunately, the

Is there a recommended way to retrieve the original type from an AllocaInst object? For example, I am creating alloca instructions using the IRBuilder interface like: alloca = builder.CreateAlloca( Type::getDoubleTy( context ), 0, variableName.c_str() ); and I place the alloca into a symbol table. Later when I am generating instructions for an assignment operation, I want to check the type of

Curtis Faith wrote: > Is there a recommended way to retrieve the original type from an > AllocaInst object? > > For example, I am creating alloca instructions using the IRBuilder > interface like: > > alloca = builder.CreateAlloca( Type::getDoubleTy( context ), 0, > variableName.c_str() ); > > and I place the alloca into a symbol table. > > Later when I am

On Monday, July 30, 2012 12:16 AM, Cameron McInally wrote: > Hey Andy, > > I proposed a similar patch to LLVM (left circular shift) around 10/2011. > Parts of my patch did make it into trunk about a year after, but others > did not. > > At that time, my solution was to add a binary operator to the IRBuilder, > since LCS fits in nicely with the other shift operators. But,

Previously the Constructor for the Alloca Instruction took the type of the returned value. But now it has been updated to take the type of the Pointer Operand. My question is: how do I set the type of the return value of Alloca ? My code uses the old form of the constructor, and when the pointer is passed to "replaceAllUsesWith()" of an Instruction Pointer, an assert fails saying that