Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass]"
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass]
Try doing a clean build, then doing 'make ENABLE_PIC=1'
-Chris
On Apr 11, 2010, at 9:13 AM, ambika wrote:
>
>
> From: ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in>
> Date: April 8, 2010 9:10:25 AM PDT
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: [LLVMdev] Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have added LoaderInterface pass in
2010 Apr 12
1
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass]
Tried that but still no success
Chris Lattner wrote:
> Try doing a clean build, then doing 'make ENABLE_PIC=1'
>
> -Chris
>
> On Apr 11, 2010, at 9:13 AM, ambika wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *From: *ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in <mailto:ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in>>
>> *Date: *April 8, 2010 9:10:25 AM PDT
>> *To: *llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
2010 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass
Hi,
I have added LoaderInterface pass in llvm code and then I invoke this
pass in other pass. Iget the following error:
llvm[0]: Linking Release Loadable Module MyDfg.so
/usr/bin/ld: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-obj/lib/ss-fs/Release/MyDfg.o:
relocation R_386_GOTOFF against undefined symbol `(anonymous
namespace)::LoaderInterface::ID' can not be used when making a shared object
/usr/bin/ld:
2010 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
Hi,
you need something like this in your pass:
void YourPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
}
because you need to specify which analysis you are using.
Tobi
2010 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
But this is already present in my pass.
And I am not able to understand the cause for the error:
opt: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:203:
AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const
[with AnalysisType = llvm::DominatorTree]: Assertion `ResultPass &&
"getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "
2010 Jun 04
4
[LLVMdev] Duplicating a Basic Block
Hi,
I had asked earlier from my another ID about duplicating a basic block, but
that server is down for moment.
I was given suggestion to use CloneBasicBlock, but when I used it I get an
error :
While deleting: i32* %a
Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: store i32* %a, i32** %p,
align 4
opt: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-2.6/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:81: virtual
llvm::Value::~Value():
2010 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Duplicating a Basic Block
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Ambika Agarwal <agarwal.ambika at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had asked earlier from my another ID about duplicating a basic block, but
> that server is down for moment.
> I was given suggestion to use CloneBasicBlock, but when I used it I get an
> error :
>
> While deleting: i32* %a
> Use still stuck around after Def is
2010 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
ambika wrote:
> But this is already present in my pass.
> And I am not able to understand the cause for the error:
>
Can you send a copy of your getAnalysisUsage() method for your pass?
There are some funny errors that can occur when you do things that the
PassManager cannot handle.
For example, if you're requiring a transform pass, that can cause
strange assertions from the
2010 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
ambika wrote:
> Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using,
>
> void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
> AU.setPreservesAll();
> AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
> }
>
> and then I use it as,
>
>
> bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) {
>
> DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
> ......
>
2010 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using,
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
}
and then I use it as,
bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) {
DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
......
}
John Criswell wrote:
> ambika wrote:
>> But this is already present in
2010 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Error while running my pass with opt]
John Criswell wrote:
> ambika wrote:
>> Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using,
>>
>> void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage&AU) const {
>> AU.setPreservesAll();
>> AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
>> }
>>
>> and then I use it as,
>>
>>
>> bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module&M) {
>>
>>
2010 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] Regarding a pass in LLVM
Thanks that helped me out.
But now I am facing one more problem. It says :
‘llvm::ModulePass* llvm::createMyAnaPass()’ should have been declared
inside ‘llvm’
but I can find no place to declare it.
Where should I do it.
John Criswell wrote:
> ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to add a pass inn LLVM, and I actually want to add it in
>> source
2010 Feb 23
1
[LLVMdev] Regarding a pass in LLVM
I have done that. I have defined createMyAnaPass() in Passes.h and it is
defined in MyAna.cpp and used in LinkAllPasses.h
But still the error :
/home/ambika/llvm/llvm-obj/tools/opt/Release/opt.o: In function `global
constructors keyed to opt.cpp':
opt.cpp:(.text+0x1e89): undefined reference to `llvm::createMyAnaPass()'
I dont understand whats the problem.
Jianzhou Zhao wrote:
>
2010 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] Help regarding Flow of function calls in llvm
No, this is not what I am looking for. I am looking for something like
may be a debugger so that I can trace the function calls in source of llvm.
llvm-db dosent work it says "debugger not implemented" when i try to use
it. Can I use gdb or something like that with llvm.
What I basically want is to know that when I run some Alias Analysis
then from where the functions of file
2010 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] Regarding a pass in LLVM
Hi,
I am trying to add a pass inn LLVM, and I actually want to add it in
source code, not just directly into object code.
For that I included the lines in my file MyAna.cpp
(llvm-2.6/lib/ana/MyAna.cpp)
char MyAna::ID = 0;
static RegisterPass<MyAna> X("my-aa","My Analysis");
static RegisterAnalysisGroup<AliasAnalysis> Y(X);
ModulePass *llvm::createMyAnaPass() {
2010 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] Regarding a pass in LLVM
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:17 AM, ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote:
> Thanks that helped me out.
> But now I am facing one more problem. It says :
>
> ‘llvm::ModulePass* llvm::createMyAnaPass()’ should have been declared
> inside ‘llvm’
>
> but I can find no place to declare it.
> Where should I do it.
We can do what scalar optimizations do.
All scalar passes
2010 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] Duplicating a Basic Block
Hi,
I want to duplicate a set of basic blocks and finally modify the
structure of CFG.
But if I just duplicate a block then name of all the temporaries will
be same as in original block.
So is there a way to rename all the temporaries in a basic block or I
will have to do it instruction by instruction?
Thanks and Regards,
Ambika
2010 Apr 15
3
[LLVMdev] How to extract Left Hand side of Instruction
Hi,
Suppose I have llvm Instruction as :
%9 = load i32* %b, align 4
and I want to extract the name of temporary value used here ie 9.
Can any body tell that how can I do that?
thanks and regards,
Ambika
2010 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] Finding Merge nodes in CFG
Actually I have collected some pointer information in the form [ p -> a,c
]. Now suppose at some node I have information as [p->a,c]. Now i want to
find a merge node above this node where this information is actually
geting merged.
So if I get a merge node above this, I can check in its predecessors if
their out has only [p->a] or [p->c] and if not so then I will look for the
next
2010 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] Help regarding Flow of function calls in llvm
llvm itself is a plain C++ program, so you can use gdb on it. gdb
doesn't know how to step through compiled IR, yet.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:13 PM, ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote:
> No, this is not what I am looking for. I am looking for something like
> may be a debugger so that I can trace the function calls in source of llvm.
> llvm-db dosent work it says