similar to: [LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues"

2010 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Hi Jack, > Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin? Anton built it once. There were some problems with dynamic libraries: gcc's plugin support requires the use of dynamic libraries, and the configure logic it uses thinks that darwin does not support dynamic libraries! So it is possible that plugin support was automatically disabled because of this. Try configuring with
2010 Apr 11
7
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin? > > Anton built it once. There were some problems with dynamic libraries: gcc's > plugin support requires the use of dynamic libraries, and the configure logic > it uses thinks that darwin does not support dynamic libraries! So it is >
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On 04/10/2010 08:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make > g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\"
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Hi Jack, > bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make > g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\" -DTARGET_NAME=\"x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0\" -I/Users/howarth/llvm_svn/dragonegg
2010 Apr 11
1
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:29:28AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >> bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make >> g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\"
2011 Apr 08
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
> Is there anything I can do to make the build more verbose so I can debug this? make VERBOSE=1
2010 Apr 13
4
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:29:07PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 04/10/2010 08:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > > bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make > > g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD
2011 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:58:10PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Is there anything I can do to make the build more verbose so I can debug this? > > make VERBOSE=1 Duncan, Oddly this shows... GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.5/bin/gcc-4 LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/bin/llvm-config make VERBOSE=1 CPPFLAGS="-DENABLE_LTO -I/sw/include" Compiling utils/TargetInfo.cpp g++ -c
2012 Dec 01
4
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. > So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing mach_override. > > --kcc Kostya, Unless I am misunderstanding the code in asan/asan_intercepted_functions.h,
2012 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
+kremenek, ganna On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > > asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. > > So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing
2009 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: PPC Nightly Build Result
Something last night broke the build on Darwin PPC. Possible Gabor's check-in? -bw Begin forwarded message: > From: admin at spang.apple.com (admin) > Date: March 4, 2009 3:56:10 AM PST > To: wendling at apple.com > Subject: PPC Nightly Build Result > > /Volumes/SandBox/NightlyTest/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/obj- > powerpc-powerpc/./prev-gcc/xgcc
2012 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing mach_override. --kcc On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>wrote: > Looks like this happens on x86_64 because the position of __cxa_throw > is too far from
2012 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:42:15PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > +kremenek, ganna > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > > > asanin favor of OSX's
2009 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: PPC Nightly Build Result
Hi Bill, this might be a latent bug related to PPC. I have no such machine to access atm., but I shall be able to reproduce the problem when back at home. (In about 4 hours). I keep you informed. Cheers, Gabor On Mar 4, 7:57 pm, Bill Wendling <wendl... at apple.com> wrote: > Something last night broke the build on Darwin PPC. Possible Gabor's   > check-in? > > -bw
2009 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does > not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even > though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols > during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code: [snip] This should be fixed now. Now about this one: >
2009 Jun 30
3
[LLVMdev] build failure on ARM linux
I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/include -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -g
2012 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM show error preprocessor "Must #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS before #including Support/DataTypes.h"
Hello All, I build source code of Ocelot[http://code.google.com/p/gpuocelot/]. It using LLVM dependency of Ocelot. llvm-config get cppflags represent as below in order to build with Ocelot. ./llvm-config --cppflags -I/home/chatsiri/workspacecpp/llvm/include -I/home/chatsiri/workspacecpp/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
2014 Jul 18
2
[LLVMdev] Bug in llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h?
Hi, I think I ran into a rather subtle bug inside llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h which only shows up when compiling the code with GCC-4.8 with switched-off optimizations. (Both clang and GCC-4.7 don't trigger the bug.) I already filed a bug against GCC-4.8 which was rejected by the GCC-folks as being invalid, because the code (basically ArrayRef.h) "is doing something bad - it's retaining a
2015 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Ideas for making llvm-config --cxxflags more useful
Hi, My understanding of llvm-config --cxxflags is that it is supposed to report which flags are necessary to compile a program that will include LLVM's headers and link against its libraries. What it currently reports is all of the flags which were used to compile LLVM. This is not very useful, because users are required in most cases to filter out flags they don't want. I would like
2009 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] CMake build maturity
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> writes: > > >> It seems that the llvm-config generated when building through CMake does >> not contain -lpthread on my 32-bit Core2Duo Gentoo Linux system (even >> though I configured with LLVM_ENABLE_PTHREADS). I get missing symbols >> during linking of e.g. the JIT tutorial code: >>