similar to: [LLVMdev] The "scope" of passes

hi again :) On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:57 AM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > hi john, > > thanks very much, i will try it out. > > --best regards > ether > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:03 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> ether zhhb wrote: >> >>> hi all, >>> >>> i have some thing

ether zhhb wrote: > hi John, > > sorry for reply so late. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu > <mailto:criswell at uiuc.edu>> wrote: > > Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb > <etherzhhb at gmail.com <mailto:etherzhhb at gmail.com>> wrote: > >

Devang Patel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" >> function, but others not. >> >> so, is there any special reason that only "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" is >> allow? >> >> > >

hi John, sorry for reply so late. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Devang Patel wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" >>> function, but others

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > that's because FunctionPass implement the "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" > function, but others not. > > so, is there any special reason that only "addLowerLevelRequiredPass" is > allow? > There is no reason to not allow it. It is not done because there was not any use. If

hi John, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:27 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > ether zhhb wrote: > >> hi John, >> >> sorry for reply so late. >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu<mailto: >> criswell at uiuc.edu>> wrote: >> >> Devang Patel wrote: >> >> On

Hello, this is a question, concerning cmake lists configuration. I am trying to link together two llvm passes, but they still should be as two modules. So: passA - A.so passB - B.so passB should use passA , so I sould use target_link_libraries ( and of course, I have included useAnalysis in passB) . But I can't link libraries that are build as Modules, so I tried to create two libraries at

Hi Hal, I add a function named "vectorizeBasicBlock" which allow users to perform basic block vectoirzation inside their pass. But i am not sure whether i missed something as no one use the function right now (But it will be used by Polly sometimes later[1]). In addition, we (tobi and me) also want to make the vectorizer being configured command line flags. To achieve this, we are

Ether, Sounds great! Please keep in mind that, eventually, we'll also want to configure those options from TLI (or something similar). The patch looks good to me. -Hal On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:54:18 +0800 Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > I add a function named "vectorizeBasicBlock" which allow users to > perform basic block

Hello, I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of a BasicBlock and I cannot. In this particular example, I try to get the previous instruction of the end instruction. I am trying 2 methods: 1. I have the following sequence of code: bool patternDC::runOnBasicBlock(BasicBlock &BB) { ... if (BB.getTerminator()) { Instruction* current =

Duncan Sands <baldrick <at> free.fr> writes: > > Hi Anshul, > > > I am creating a pass that will pass loaded value by load instruction to an > > external function. > > I don't know how to do it.Please Help. > > your question is too vague for anyone to be able to help you. Add details, > for example provide the code for your pass. > >

On 12/17/12 10:34 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > Hello, > > I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of > a BasicBlock and I cannot. In this particular example, I try to get > the previous instruction of the end instruction. I am trying 2 methods: > > > > 1. I have the following sequence of code: > > bool

Hi Alastair, Thank you so much for the information on the tools. Actually, I need to analyze which sections of code are prone to misses and mis predicts, and would have to eventually instrument the code. I was able to instrument and call an external function, but faced an issue while passing an argument to the function. I am following EdgeProfiling.cpp but couldn't figure out the problem.

Rotem Varon wrote: > Hi, > > Is there an API for getting (within a basic block pass) the number of basic block in the program ? > Not of which I am aware. You will probably need to write code that does this for you. One place to put the code would be in the doInitialization() method of the BasicBlockPass that you're writing. However, I'm not sure if the count would be

PS: I works when I use Instruction* prev = current->getPrevNode(); But then I have runtime error Stack dump that is very frequent... On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:20 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 12/17/12 10:34 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > > Hello, > > I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of a >

Hi, Thank you for your answer. But let me get it straight, when i compile code with the llvm compiler, and my basic block pass is being processed, other passes are concurrently being processed ? Thanks. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Rotem Varon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there an API for getting (within a basic block

Hi, I'm running dovecot-2.3 git and seeing on 2 of my Dovecot installations, the following message logged quite frequently: Aug 31 16:55:53 lightning.reub.net dovecot[7698]: auth-worker(7707): Error: getpwent() failed: Invalid argument Aug 31 16:55:53 lightning.reub.net dovecot[7698]: replicator: Error: User listing returned failure Aug 31 16:55:53 lightning.reub.net dovecot[7698]:

Sure: https://www.reub.net/files/dovecot/lightning-dovecot.conf https://www.reub.net/files/dovecot/thunderstorm-dovecot.conf Updated nightly. Reuben On 1/09/2018 12:26 am, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you provide doveconf -n? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> >

Hello all; So my goal is to insert some (self-written) function calls in the LLVM IR. I can achieve it with a ModulePass and using the getOrInsertFunction() call. For a ModulePass I follow the steps- 1. Compile the code (in which call instructions are to be inserted) to LLVM IR 2. Compile the file (which contains the *called* external function ) to LLVM IR 3. Link them together and run the

No. Neither of those are installed on either system. Reuben On 1/09/2018 12:09 am, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Could apparmor or selinux be causing this! > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> > Date: 31/08/2018 16:50 (GMT+02:00) > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot