similar to: [LLVMdev] source code information in LLVM IR

Ah ok. Sorry. :) I think that argument "-femit-all-decls" will help you. Olivier. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam < arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any > way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static > functions when they are not being

Hi, Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static functions when they are not being called anywhere inside the current module. Other compilers seem to generate intermediate code (lcc, for instance). Thanks for your reply..Olivier. Sincerely Arvind On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Olivier Meurant

Hi Arvind, you need to use it effectively : static int add(int a, int b) { return a+b; } int use() { return add(4,5); } ==> ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" define i32 @use()

Hi, I am trying to compile a single module (dgemm.c) using clang and generate dgemm.ll. Command: clang -emit-llvm dgemm.c -S -o dgemm.ll Some of the functions are declared as static and clang ignores these functions: One of the functions is: static void innerloop(double a, const double* b, double* c, double beta) { *b = a*beta; return; } Is there any way to make clang generate llvm code

Hi Devang, Thanks for your reply. You mentioned " First parameter is the compiler generated temp. and 3rd parameter provides info about the variable, including its name 'u'." I did manage to get this far. But, I am finding it difficult to access this info using LLVM APIs. The third parameter is of type "metadata". So I was able to access it by casting it to MDNode.

Hi, I have been working towards generating my own IR code from llvm IR. I have hit a stumbling block with respect to "getelementptr" used inside another llvm instruction. Example: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* getelementptr inbounds ([10 x i32]* @k, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %tmp2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1] I am unable to get a handle on the second "getelementptr" in this

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have the following source code: > > long f(long x, long y) > { >        long u; > >   u = x+y; >   return u; > }; > > After clang (with debug option set) and llvm opt using mem2reg, I get > the following .ll file >

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi Devang, > > Thanks for your reply. You mentioned > " First parameter is the compiler generated temp. and 3rd parameter > provides info about the variable, including its name 'u'." > > I did manage to get this far. But, I am finding it difficult to

Hi, I got the "getelementptr" issue solved...John Criswell helped me...Thanks, Duncan, for your reply. I have another query though. When I try to pass a structure into a function in my C program, if there are less than four scalars in the structure, the clang tool creates llvm code where the structure is passed as sequence of scalars. If there are more than (or equal to) four scalars,

Dear all, I have the following source code: long f(long x, long y) { long u; u = x+y; return u; }; After clang (with debug option set) and llvm opt using mem2reg, I get the following .ll file *************************************************************************** ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout =

Hi Arvind, > I have been working towards generating my own IR code from llvm IR. I > have hit a stumbling block with respect to "getelementptr" used inside > another llvm instruction. > > Example: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* getelementptr > inbounds ([10 x i32]* @k, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %tmp2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1] > > I am unable to get a handle on

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization phases, Inline for aggressive inline opt. LNO for loop opt, WOPT for machine independent opt(

Hi, I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR line number back to its C source code line number. Thanks Sincerely Arvind ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ Arvind Sudarsanam Phone: (435) 512-7769 CPU Technology, Inc

Hi, I have been working towards developing compiler optimization tools targeting multi core processors while using LLVM IR as the starting point and building on top of the analysis and optimization passes available in the llvm source. Recently, I looked into Open64 and its intermediate representation WHIRL. Documentation for developers to use Open64 seems to be inadequate (when compared to LLVM

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Arvind, > > >> I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the >> front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR >> line number back to its C source code line number. >> > > this is a frequently asked question, so you should be able to find plenty > of info by searching the mailing

Hi all, I have the following C code. static int addp(int *c, int a,int b) { int x = *c + a + b; return(x); } I want to replace *c with a scalar. So I tried the -argpromotion pass. However, it fails to do anything to the resulting llvm file. List of commands: clang add.c -c -o add.bc clang add.c -S -o add.ll opt -argpromotion -stats add.bc -o add_a.bc llvm-dis < add_a.bc > add_a.ll Also,

Hi Arvind, > I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the > front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR > line number back to its C source code line number. this is a frequently asked question, so you should be able to find plenty of info by searching the mailing list archives. The usual answer is to use debug info. Ciao, Duncan.

Can you tell how to use vector globally? I mean, i am able to add entries to a vector in a basicblock, but whenever a basicblock function call is returned, the vector becomes empty. So how to use data structures globally? And one thing, where is main ( or same kind of) function in llvm? Thanks for you reply. Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi, > >> Actually i have to implement strength

Hi, I am new to LLVM and have been trying to get it working on scratchbox (ARM target). When I try to build llvm-2.1, the build freezes with the following output.. /scratchbox/compilers/arm-softfloat-linux-gcc-3.4.4-cs-2005q3-2-glibc-2.3.6/bin/sbox-arm-softfloat-linux-gnu-nm: 'libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx_s.o': No such file mv -f libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.visT libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.vis

HI Arvind, I think you are using an old llc version. VarArg support was implemented a long time ago. Lauro 2008/1/28, Arvind Ayyangar <arvind.ayyangar at gmail.com>: > Hi all, > I had little success installing llvm inside scratchbox for an ARM > build so have been trying to generate assembly code for arm using the > llc utility. However, llc fails to generate code for