similar to: [LLVMdev] Scilab-to-LLVM Google Summer of Code project

First of all, I'd like to thank the entire LLVM team for this opportunity. Torvald, google only displays the abstract on the results page, but I do know about Tanger and it was mentioned in both the proposal and the comments that followed, I'll write an email to you later with that info in a bit, and I do intend to use as much available infrastructure as possible, and tanger/tinystm are

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1~rc5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc Hi, your package no longer builds on sparc: | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sivp_0.5.2-2-sparc-3aHxSt/sivp-0.5.2' | SCI_DISABLE_TK=1 SCI_JAVA_ENABLE_HEADLESS=1 DOCBOOK_ROOT=/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh \ | /usr/bin/scilab -nw -f

Hi, I'm sorry if this post sounds a little bit off-topic, I'm currently a graduate student from Texas A&M University, and my major is computer science. My research interests are in compiler construction and static analysis. I heard Google Summer Code before, and I would like to attend this cool program this year, because my interests, I really would like broad my knowledge and

Hello, Ramon > As I told you, I am working with the Java frontend. Currently I am > working with the code from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/java/. The > first task has been to put it up to date, since it was written for > LLVM 1.9 and there are few incompatibilities. This is mostly done. How > can I submit a patch? Just post the patch into llvm-commits mailing list. > I am

Hi Ramon, Ramón García wrote: > I am interested to get this work funded by a Google summer of code > grant. Is there anyone interested in mentoring this project? Would be > the LLVM interested in it? > I'm in the process of checking in a Java and a CLI FE to the llvm repository. I'm not sure what's the shape of llvm-java. Do your changes make it run some

Based on my experience this last one (the generation of shared libraries) is the most important performance wise, and the one that would make a difference from a performance point of view. I would like to prepare a proposal as soon as posible. Could I have a look at your code privately, even if there are licensing issues pending? I understand that this issues are just temporary, and will in no

Dear LLVM-Dev, Your ideas page said that you'd take applications to write new language frontends for LLVM. I've been in-progress for most of a year now writing a compiler for my language Deca as a side-project, and I'd like to make it GSOC project by targeting it at LLVM. My other commitments are that I've applied to several different REU programs. If one of them

As I told you, I am working with the Java frontend. Currently I am working with the code from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/java/. The first task has been to put it up to date, since it was written for LLVM 1.9 and there are few incompatibilities. This is mostly done. How can I submit a patch? I am interested to get this work funded by a Google summer of code grant. Is there anyone interested

The memory consumed by the code compiled is huge in server applications. And it is not shared by different virtual machine instances. By contrast, shared libraries are memory mapped, therefore they are shared between different instances of the executables using them. It is posible to throw away code after using it, but then compilation cost would be repeated. And dynamic compilation prevents

On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Chris Lattner wrote: > [llvmir] "Software Transactional Memory (STM) support in LLVM" by > Luis Felipe Strano Hi, I'd like to know more about the directions for the STM project. Somewhat contrary to what the project's abstract states, there are open C/C++ based implementations for compiler support for memory transactions. Besides some

I would prefer to see actual code to make safe schedules. With code I can see what changes one must make. I can also show in detail these changes, which would give security to the LLVM project that the proposal is viable. By contrast, without code, neither me nor LLVM project can ensure that the project will be successfully performed behind schedule. Since this is a difficult project (we are

Ramón García wrote: > I would like to see the code of your front end. > > It should be available in a week or two. I'm currently dealing with licensing issues. > I started working with llvm-java, since it was what was available. It > does not run yet (small compilation issues, almost done), > but the design seems fine. It can run (when setup complete) small > pieces

Hello everyone! I am Shashvat Tripathi, a student of BITS Pilani, India. (*LinkedIn <http://in.linkedin.com/pub/shashvat-tripathi/3a/2a8/75b> | **Github <https://github.com/shashvattrip>)*. I recently heard about GSoC and wanted to apply through it. I was going through this year's project proposals and a couple of them caught my interest. Support Another Language using SWIG

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > > There is no real missing feature. The VMs can execute standard > applications (last time I checked, the JVM can run tomcat), and the > implementations follow the VM specifications. The CLI implementation > lacks generics and overflow detection, but this is not top priority in > my mind. > > Among many features, here are the ones that I'd

Although the script doesn't generate identical results, it seems to get fairly close. The deviations for the Butterworth filter settings seem larger than for the equal loudness filter. This script requires OpenSource scilab which is available for Windows, Linux and MacOS. http://www.scilab.org/products/scilab/download Earl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

I'm happy to say that LLVM has 6 projects approved for Google SoC this year (3x more than last year!): [vmkit] "Generics support for N3" by Tilmann Schelle [clang] "Adding support for C++ classes in clang" by Argiris Kirtzidis [codegen] "PSP (Playstation Portable) support into LLVM Mips backend" by Bruno Cardoso Lopes [llvmir]

I would like to see the code of your front end. I started working with llvm-java, since it was what was available. It does not run yet (small compilation issues, almost done), but the design seems fine. It can run (when setup complete) small pieces of Java code, but no real application, since it does not support exception handling (jsr/ret bytecodes) yet,nor garbage collection. Implementing these

Ramón García wrote: > Based on my experience this last one (the generation of shared > libraries) is the most important performance wise, and the one that > would make a difference from a performance point of view. > > That's more or less true: generating shared libraries will improve startup time, not steady-state time. It will decrease steady-state performance (both for

Ramón García wrote: > I would prefer to see actual code to make safe schedules. With code I can see > what changes one must make. I can also show in detail these changes, > which would give security to the LLVM project that the proposal is > viable. By contrast, > without code, neither me nor LLVM project can ensure that the project will > be successfully performed behind

Hello useRs, The results of the SORT function differ from Scilab/Matlab for Complex Numbers in my example. This design is the desirable in R? Thanks. Cleber r <- c( 1.7507+0.1689i, 1.7507-0.1689i, 1.3886+0.0000i, 1.0458+0.0792i, 1.0458-0.0792i, 0.8279+0.1861i, 0.8279-0.1861i, 0.8263+0.3731i, 0.8263-0.3731i, 0.6548+0.0000i ) > cbind(sort(r, d=T)) [,1] [1,]