Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] working on llvm 2.7 release notes"
2010 Apr 22
1
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
Thanks, I must have missed these, added.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>
>> Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take
>> a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit
>> improvements if you have commit access):
>
> About the API changes, some that hit
2010 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
> Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take
> a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit
> improvements if you have commit access):
About the API changes, some that hit me when I ported some code to
LLVM 2.7, and not in the release notes (I had sent a private email
some time ago) :
---
2010 Apr 22
8
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access):
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Things still needed are marked with FIXMEs. These include:
1. Clang needs a blurb describing what's new in 2.7. Have the clang folks been doing anything for the last 6 months?
2. I
2009 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] Please review the 2.5 release notes
Chris Lattner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any
> oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change
> the document.
>
> The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now!
>
FYI, I'm reviewing the
2008 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 2.4 release notes draft
Hi All,
I am done with my first pass over the release notes, you can see them
in mainline here:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
In addition to the inevitable typos and other things that need to be
cleaned up, there are several todo's for specific people:
1. All: please let me know if there is something missing that I forgot.
2. Daniel, please update the clang section [DANIEL].
3.
2006 Aug 09
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 1.8 release notes draft
Thanks all, I've incorporated all the feedback so far:
http://llvm.org/ChrisLLVM/projects/llvm-www/releases/1.8/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
-Chris
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Bil wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look
>> and send me any comments
2011 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed
2011/10/28 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote:
>
> Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I
> could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for
> interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of
> commits would help this in the future.
>
2011 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 release notes ARM Target
On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Joe Abbey wrote:
> I've done a first pass over the past 6 months of changes and some notable things stood out:
>
> * The ARM backend has reworked Set Jump Long Jump EH Lowering.
> * The ARM backend includes improved support for Cortex-M
> * The ARM backend adds parsing and encoding ARM/Thumb/Thumb2 assembly
>
> There are also many many
2009 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
The PIC16 is an 8-bit target but under the "LLVM IR and Core
Improvements"heading it's called a 16-bit target.
--John
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:14:21 -0700
> Subject: [LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
> Hi
2008 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Please review the LLVM 2.3 release notes!
Please review and comment about:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
If we forgot anything or if there are edits, please commit them or let
me know. Thanks!
-Chris
2011 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] New, incremental, approach to release notes
Hi All,
Producing release notes at the end of the release is a becoming more of a problem as the project grows. I've been doing this by going through all of the LLVM commits since the last release and pulling out things that I find interesting and potentially impactful to people. However, as the project grows and there are more commits, this has been becoming less and less practical.
To
2012 Dec 14
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.2 release notes + LLVM Users
The LLVM 3.2 release is winding down, and that means release notes! There are two pieces to this. First, if you're an external LLVM user, we'd like to list you as such in the release notes. This is a great way to get some free advertisement. The section is here:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_32/docs/ReleaseNotes.html?revision=HEAD#externalproj
Please email
2011 Mar 10
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 release notes + "Projects using LLVM" + API changes
Hi All,
With 2.9 starting to make its way out into the world, it is time to start poking at the release notes. I plan to make a pass through llvm-commits to cull some of the major changes into bullets, but am already behind and insanely busy with other stuff over the next week.
If you have commit access, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a pass through llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
2009 Oct 10
3
[LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
Hi All,
I'm done with the first pass over the 2.6 release notes, see them here:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes-2.6.html
Please feel free to directly edit the file or send improvements. We
aim to release 2.6 tomorrow or early next week.
-Chris
2009 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
What is the reason for the splitting of add and others into integer
and floating point versions? Consistency with the div and remainder
operations? I think the reason should be made clear in the release
notes.
Cheers,
David
2009/10/11 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm done with the first pass over the 2.6 release notes, see them here:
>
2009 Mar 02
6
[LLVMdev] Please review the 2.5 release notes
Hi All,
Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any
oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change
the document.
The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now!
Thanks!
-Chris
2008 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.2 Release Notes
Hi All,
The first draft of the llvm 2.2 release notes are now available:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
The release is scheduled for Monday, so please take a look at them and
send me your feedback, or (better yet) just commit fixes directly to
the document in llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html. In addition to editing
improvements I'm particularly interested in adding missing things
2010 Apr 27
0
LLVM 2.7 Release!
Hi LLVM Friends, Fans, Followers and Fanatics,
LLVM 2.7 is live! You can download it here:
http://llvm.org/releases/ and read about it here:
http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
This release includes approximately 6 months of development that provide
major enhancements and new features over the LLVM 2.6 release. This
includes significantly better generated code, improvements to
2006 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 1.8 release notes draft
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take
> a look and send me any comments or feedback you have:
> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
Trivial changes:
* Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better
portability to more C++ Compilers.
Probably
2010 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] 2.8 Release notes - LLVM r100304 API change and OpenJDK/IcedTea got support
On 2010-10-04 06:43, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes:
> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I