similar to: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Need 2.7 release team volunteers

I'm looking for someone to qualify x86-32 linux for 2.7 and beyond. If you want a basic idea of how the release process works, see this: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html Please email me if you are interested! Thanks, Tanya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

The 2.7 pre-release testing ends tomorrow March 24th (11:59PM PDT). I've updated the 2.7 release schedule to include a one week regression fixing week. This is only for regressions found in 2.7 and not for miscellaneous bug fixes. I will no longer be merging in patches that are not a regression as defined in our release process (http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify).

LLVMers, As LLVM grows and begins to support more targets and more frontends, its becoming a very large task to qualify a release. Therefore, I'm seeking a couple of active members of the community to volunteer to be a part of the LLVM release team (for 2.6+). This does not replace general user testing during the release process. Members of this LLVM Release Team will need to be very

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Isaac Dupree <ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote: > On 03/06/10 18:03, OvermindDL1 wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Isaac Dupree >> <ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>  wrote: >>> >>> On 03/06/10 17:37, OvermindDL1 wrote: >>>> >>>> Whoops, mailing list headers still broken,

Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code freeze to ensure adequate testing. Please do your part to keep the tree stable in the days leading up to the code freeze. Thanks! -Tanya 2/21 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 2/27 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/6 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/13

On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. >>> >>> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code >>> freeze to ensure adequate

> The 2.7 binaries are available for testing: > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.7/pre-release1/ Any plans for LLVM binaries and LLVM-GCC front-end binaries for MinGW32 similar to 2.6? Jon

Hello, Tanya > 4) Mingw x86 (Anton do you want to continue this?) Yes, I'm still going to prepare llvm-gcc mingw32 images. However, the testing procedure for mingw is slightly different due to lack of dejagnu stuff. However, I have plans to fix the main LLVM testsuite to be more mingw32-friendly :) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint

Hello, > I noticed that the mingw release only contains binaries and not > libraries nor header files. That's correct, because headers will contain, for example, absolute paths from the box I've built the libraries on (mostly in config.h and llvm-config script). I won't provide neither libraries nor headers, since I don't know how to make them 'path-neutral' without

Below is the 2.7 release schedule: 2/21 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 2/27 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/6 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/13 - Pre-release2 released & community testing begins 3/20 - Pre-release2 testing ends 3/22 - Release Please remember that all major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code freeze. Thanks, Tanya

We have pushed back the release a couple of weeks. Below is the revised schedule: 3/7 - Code Freeze (9PM PST) 3/13 - Pre-release1 released & community testing begins 3/20 - Pre-release1 testing ends 3/27 - Pre-release2 released & community testing begins 4/3 - Pre-release2 testing ends 4/5 - Release As a reminder, all major changes need to be checked in 1 week before code freeze.

I noticed that the mingw release only contains binaries and not libraries nor header files. I think it would be nice if the mingw release contained the same files as the other releases. This would mean that people who want to use LLVM with the Haskell bindings on Windows don't have to build and install LLVM (first installing mingw), but they could just download binaries and install those.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. > > I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down > miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the > "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for > 2.7. > > Tanya, I can

and AJB kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm [I see AlanBartlett as the last editor on that page] I have installed the given ajb source rpm kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm, and verified that it is intact: [herrold at kernel-bleeder linux-2.6.35.i686]$ rpm -Vp ~/build/ajb/sources/kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm warning: /home/herrold/build/ajb/sources/kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:

I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for 2.7. Tanya, I can also do the x86-32-pc-linux release testing if no one else steps up. - Daniel On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Douglas

There has been a notice of a breach (see: CVE-2007-4752) as to some binary content upstream of CentOS. I do not address that matter here beyond stating that the CentOS team have responded to the matter, and will continue this review process: updated 22 Aug 2008 CentOS acknowledge CVE-2007-4752 and are reviewing our build and signing processes and hosts for signs of tampering subsequent

On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote: >> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st. >> >> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code >> freeze to ensure adequate testing. Please do your part to keep the tree >> stable in the days leading up to the

Hi, I would like to compare 2 lists resulted from a sql query! bu there are different levels, so when I want to do: release1<-sqlQuery(channel,paste("select distinct c.ID,c.Title TitleCrit from category cat, category_criteria cc, criteria c, question_criteria qc, question q, form_question fq, form f, release_form rf, release r, product_release pr, product p where cat.ID=cc.category and

Thanks. Here are my results for the commands you list: > which pdflatex /bin/pdflatex > rpm -qf /usr/bin/pdflatex texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch > cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > rpm -qi texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch Name : texlive-latex-bin-bin Epoch : 2 Version :

OvermindDL1 a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> / * snip */ >>>>