similar to: [LLVMdev] Virtual OS

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

Hello everybody, I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) but even more I am interested in exec-time modeling (how long does it take to execute a bunch of LLVA instructions on

I posted this question on the llvm channel on irc. I am new to all of this. And I only found out about LLVA as a result of the irc. And please forgive my erroneous terminology. So let me try this as best I can. I want to know if the code of LLVA/LLVM can be used as a virtual processor in configuring the linux kernel? Maybe you have already encountered this and possibly accomplished it as

On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform > performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the > derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the > value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) > but even more I am

Hi guys, I was looking arround Firefox 3.1 js JIT (TraceMonkey), it made me wonder if there is anyone working on a trace-tree technique for optimising the runtime over head of LLVM JIT?? ---------------------------------------------------------------- With Best Regards Mr. Kasra Nassiri Department of Mathematics & Computer Science Imperial College London

No. I am not aware of any/ Evan On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Kasra wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I was looking arround Firefox 3.1 js JIT (TraceMonkey), it made me > wonder if there is anyone working on a trace-tree technique for > optimising the runtime over head of LLVM JIT?? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > With Best Regards >

> Yes, I''m still working on it. The focus of that work was copy-on-write > sharing of memory for the purposes of building a (virtual) network of > honeypot systems. We have a paper in SOSP this year, talking about that > work and the copy-on-write memory implementation. See > http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/~mvrable/papers/2005-sosp-potemkin.pdf > for some information.

I managed to compile newlib with llvm-gcc yesterday. That is, the machine independent part is now basically done, and the syscall part contains no-op stubs provided by libgloss. I haven't tested the port yet, but since newlib has already been ported to many architectures, I would be pretty surprised if there were any major problems. A couple of things I noticed when configuring newlib for

Sir, I am a M.tech student of Computer Science and Engineering Department ,Indian Institute of technology, Kharagpur(India). I have to do a project in trusted computing field. I went through LLVM Project site. and I want to work in some project of LLVM. Can u suggest me some project which is somehow related to trusted computing and i can work on that ? In hope of your reply, Amit Suthar

Hi, I believe this patch would be a perfect solution for a lengthy initialization application. Added hStartEvent, service_init, checkpoint increments. ============================================================ --- temp/service.c 2005-11-27 00:03:30.000000000 +0900 +++ service.c 2005-11-27 00:01:58.000000000 +0900 @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ static VALUE cDaemonError; static VALUE rbServiceStruct,

amit suthar wrote: > Sir, > I am a M.tech student of Computer Science and Engineering > Department ,Indian Institute of technology, Kharagpur(India). > I have to do a project in trusted computing field. I went through LLVM > Project site. and I want to work in some project of LLVM. > Can u suggest me some project which is somehow related to trusted > computing and i

Got this today. Please take a look and let me know what you think. - Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kevin Burge <kevin.burge at systemware.com> Date: Dec 7, 2006 6:45 AM Subject: win32-service problems with patch To: djberg96 at gmail.com Hi Daniel, Thanks for win32-service. In the process of using it for running a reliable-msg (drb) server and clients, I had some

Hi, I am curious about if the current LLVM implementation can handle Linux kernel (or any particular version of Linux kernel). The first question I have is that, how to create LLVM bytecode of Linux kernel using LLVM gcc frontend. What changes should I make to the compiling process Linux kernel? Secondly, is it possible to compile the assembly code in Linux kernel into LLVM bytecode? I noticed

Hello, As far as I know, there is no MPX pass in LLVM (though the x86-64 backend already declares MPX registers and instructions). I wonder if anyone is currently working on the LLVM pass for MPX instrumentation, similar to Pointer Checker in gcc. If yes, could anyone elaborate on the status and accessability to other researchers? And if any help is needed? Prof. Santosh Nagarakatte, the author

On Apr 3, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform >> performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the >> derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the >>

I created an application that uses dynamic forking and it works perfect in windows, but fails in wine. Is this a bug or is this feature disabled in Wine? I don't have wine myself but someone we have testing the app for us does. It's difficult to debug over the net so I was hoping for some help here... After adding some debug info we've traced a few failure points to a call to

Gentlepersons: A long time ago I used to be able to start R (version 2.6.1) from a Delphi 7 program and run a script by using a procedure like the following: function StartRAndWait (CommandLine : string) : Boolean; var Proc_info: TProcessInformation; Startinfo: TStartupInfo; ExitCode: longword; CreateOK : Boolean; begin Result := False; { Initialize the structures }

--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc..edu> > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 8:29 AM > On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote: > > Hi All, >

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 2:52 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > From: Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 4:20 PM > On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Kasra wrote: > > I guess the