similar to: [LLVMdev] make SHARED_LIBRARY=1 broken?

I suspect my change adding --enable-shared broke you, since that configure option didn't exist before last week (r97119). SHARED_LIBRARY is not one of the variables you're supposed to be able to set on make's command line (http://llvm.org/docs/MakefileGuide.html#variables). What are you using it for? What happens if you remove it? On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:35 PM, James Williams

Hi, Thanks for getting back to me. I don't actually need opt dynamically linked but I do want shared libraries. If run make without "SHARED_LIBRARY=1" I don't appear to get any shared libraries built or installed. Is LLVM built as shared libraries supported? If so what's the correct build procedure? -- James On 2 March 2010 21:51, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for getting back to me. > > I don't actually need opt dynamically linked but I do want shared libraries. > If run make without "SHARED_LIBRARY=1" I don't appear to get any shared > libraries built or installed. > > Is LLVM built as shared libraries

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> writes: > I don't actually need opt dynamically linked but I do want shared > libraries. The cmake build should work: http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html BUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL Flag indicating is shared libraries will be built. Its default value is OFF. Shared libraries are not supported on Windows and not recommended in the other

Hi, I was evaluating all transformation passes and noticed a few things. In particular, I found three passes in the documentation that I can't seem to find any code for. Where these removed? Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators (-lowergc) Correlated Expression Elimination (-cee) Lower select instructions to branches (-lowerselect) Additionally, I found the following passes for

> Run it through its phases and report any bugs you find! [ 1495s] CMake Warning (dev) at projects/dragonegg/CMakeLists.txt:34 (get_target_property): [ 1495s] Policy CMP0026 is not set: Disallow use of the LOCATION target property. [ 1495s] Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0026" for policy details. Use the cmake_policy [ 1495s] command to set the policy and suppress this warning. [

Hi all, I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > Error opening > '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': > /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: > undefined symbol: _ZNK23Parma_Polyhedra_Library13PIP_Tree_Node2OKEv >

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting

Hi Jorge, > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > >> Error opening >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': >> /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: >> undefined symbol:

Folks, I'm having a look at LLD and I need some guidance... I know it's not production ready for x86 and ARM (the idea is to make it so). My steps: I've added it to tools/lld and ran CMake again (on x86_64) on a standard release build (static linking). It works, builds but I see one unit test error: Note: Google Test filter = InputGraphTest.Observer [==========] Running 1 test from

On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:11:25 (+0100), Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jorge, >> >> > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, >> > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: >> > >> >> Error opening >> >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so':

Hi, the ArgumentPromotion pass replaces aggregrate function arguments by multiple individual arguments. The default pass only does this when the aggregrate has 3 or less elements, otherwise the code will be unchanged. I have a need to always promote aggregrate arguments, even when there are a lot of them. The attached patch adds a "maxElements" argument to ArgPromotion's

And how about this one so as not to include a C specific header in llvm-backend (!!!) and not to have llvm-backend use a C specific flag (flag_no_builtin)? Index: gcc-4.2.llvm/gcc/c-opts.c =================================================================== --- gcc-4.2.llvm.orig/gcc/c-opts.c 2008-07-30 21:25:28.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc-4.2.llvm/gcc/c-opts.c 2008-07-30 21:26:17.000000000 +0200 @@

Hello, I have a question about how to set up a Makefile that generate a .so that I can load into opt without getting duplicate symbols. Here's what I have right now: LIBRARYNAME=previrt SHARED_LIBRARY=previrt LINK_COMPONENTS := transformUtils LINK_LIBS_IN_SHARED=1 include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.common LIBS += -lprotobuf CPPFLAGS += -I${HOME}/.root/usr/include -DGOOGLE_PROTOBUF_NO_RTTI LDFLAGS

Hi I have just written an pass which does some simple ASAP scheduling. First i registered it as optimization pass because it so nice documented and speeds up the compilation and testing times dramaticly :-). Then i just registered this part as an analysis part which should be used in a modified cbackend. All seems to work fine, exept that llc fails to link. I tried removing the

hello... I have finish my backend. But I dont know how to install my backend... llc -load=???Load what?? Can anyone teach me? thanx.

I am trying to run the LLVM hello world pass. I observe that in the OUPUT_DIR/lib the LLVMHello.a and LLVMHello.la libraries are generated. But I am confused as to how to generate the .so library file from here. I am kinda new to compilers and hence the question I know is basic , but couldnt figure the answer out myself. Thanks a lot for your help. Regards -- -- Aparna Kotha Research

Hi, I'm trying to build llvm on a Solaris/Sparc machine. I get many undefined symbols during the link phase of opt. The link command being run is below. It is identical to the link command that gets run and works on an x86 host. Thanks, Tarun g++ -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/include -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt

Michael, I've implemented a LOADABLE_MODULE feature in the makefiles: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050110/023147.html The approach taken is almost what you described below. However, I want to retain the distinction between a "regular" shared library and one that can be dlopened. So, if you specify SHARED_LIBRARY=1 you get a regular shared library