similar to: [LLVMdev] Build Errors on Snow Leopard (tblgen assertion)

(MacBook Core 2 Duo.. but 32-bits kernel... upgraded to SL) Rails 2.3.4 / Ruby 1.8.7 fine with Webrick Booting WEBrick => Rails 2.3.4 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 but trying to start Mongrel ( btw should be the default in dev mode when installed ?) mongrel_rails start -d /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/ http11.bundle:

On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:49, David Greene wrote: > > then it seems you're doing > > > > for each function > > generate_ir > > convert_to_llvm_ir > > optimize_llvm_ir > > Yep. Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off the clone and its associated ValueMap (I

On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:49, David Greene wrote: > >>> then it seems you're doing >>> >>> for each function >>> generate_ir >>> convert_to_llvm_ir >>> optimize_llvm_ir >> >> Yep. > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > 1. As

On Friday 11 July 2008 12:12, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 11 July 2008 12:05, Devang Patel wrote: > > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > > > > > 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off > > > the clone and its associated ValueMap (I call these clones > > > "pristine" > > >

Hi Not sure if this is the place to ask this or not. I''ve upgraded to RSpec 1.0.5, installed the latest TextMate bundle, but whenever I do "Run Behaviour Descriptions in selected files/directories" I get this: /Users/ashleymoran/Library/Application Support/TextMate/Pristine Copy/ Bundles/RSpec.tmbundle/Support/lib/spec_mate.rb:18:in `run_files'': private method

Hello, I'm trying to work out a way to have my Sieve filter save a "pristine" version of email messages as a backup, primarily to use for training the spam filter. I would like is to have every message saved into a single, site-wide directory (in the global sieve) before being processed additionally and delivered. The messages in that directory will be used to train the spam

On Friday 11 July 2008 12:05, Devang Patel wrote: > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > > > 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off > > the clone and its associated ValueMap (I call these clones > > "pristine" > > functions. > > > > 2. After all processing is done, clone the resulting

I have been working on a LLVM backend for the MicroBlaze (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze ) soft-processor. At this point the backend is partially functional but by no means complete. I was curious as to wether the LLVM developers would prefer to merge the backend into the main tree now and then accept patches on the backend until it was fully functional or if they prefer to wait

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Wesley Peck <peckw at wesleypeck.com> wrote: > Will this poking include converting the JIT to use the MC framework? That is the motivation for me poking at things, yes. > I've added an MC based asm parser, disassembler, and code emitter recently to the MBlaze backend and it would be nice to get JIT support automatically :) I agree, that would be

Wesley Peck <peckw at wesleypeck.com> writes: [snip] > I have fixed this with the attached patch. It anybody else getting > this error? Should I commit the patch? Yes, please. [snip]

Chandler brought up removing it back in February but Rogelio Serrano said he could maintain it and Jeff Fifield from Xilinx was supposed to check if someone could help. If no one has stepped up in the past 5 months, then I don't see an issue with removing it. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On

Folks, I saw David''s tutorial yesterday at RailsConf and started working on RSpec lastnight and am having a *ton* of trouble with the bundle for TextMate. I''ve made *some* progress, but thought I''d throw it to the list * I run ruby, including rb-rubygems using the MacPorts install (per JDD''s Sandboxing Rails) * installed rspec 0.9.4 (also rcov 0.8.0.2 and

I spun a new xen kernel from pristine sources using modules, had the APCI errors and scsi timeouts. I took pristine source and spun a monolithic kernel and everything appears to be working. gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2) if it matter. xen_changeset : Wed Oct 26 11:59:13 2005 +0100 7500:20d1a79ebe31 I have had this APCI issue on this SMP Athlon with modules for a while now.

Hi I just wondered if there was a reason why Rails controller specs are not shareable? eg describe "All XHR POSTs to /gap/calculate_quote", :shared => true do controller_name :gap # ... end describe "XHR POST /gap/calculate_quote with valid details" do it_should_behave_like "All XHR POSTs to /gap/calculate_quote" # ... end blows up with

Does anyone in the devel team recall how the ttylinux rootfs was created, by which I mean what changes were needed? Nothing detailed, just "oh, just /etc/fstab" or whatever. I haven''t yet compared myself, though I''ll figure it eventually. For XenCD, I''d like to ship a pristine ttylinux instance on the ISO image, and have the XenCD startup process copy that

Hi All, The landed patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D38481 introduced the usage of CPU_COUNT defined in glibc sched.h header. I failed to find this symbol in sched.h of glibc version 2.5-24, so compilation just fails. /home/dolphin/merge-from-upstream-area/ws/pristine/lib/Support/Threading.cpp: In function 'unsigned int llvm::hardware_concurrency()':

Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314922 On Oct 4, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: + Rui, the patch author Do we know what the oldest glibc which works with this patch is? For context, the most recent REHL 5 ships with glibc 2.5. REHL 6 ships with 2.12 and REHL ships with 2.17. I have evidence

Hello group, I am experimenting with parallel processing on my quad core Win 7 32 bit machine. Using these packages for the first time. I can see all my processor running at full performance when I use a smaller dataset require(snow) require(doSNOW) require(foreach) #change the 8 to however many cores\phys processors you have on your machine cl.tmp = makeCluster(rep("localhost",4),

On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Hanno B?ck <hanno at hboeck.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:19:02 +1100 (AEDT) > > Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > >> What version of OpenSSH is this? > > > > 6.8 portable on Linux. > > There are a *lot* of Linux flavors. Which one?

Segfault in EE->getPointerToFunction. I think it's blown the stack, gdb reports a never ending backtrace (below). I generate llvm assembly and parse/verify OK. Attached is the assembly. It is the smallest example generated that causes the segfault. If this EE uses a recursive function (??), it seems an inherent limitation in how big llvm functions can be. Simon. gdb backtrace: #0