similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM and Pool Allocation with PARSEC?

I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite infrastructure? The patch is available at [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? Best regards, --Patrick

Would someone please merge this for me? --Patrick On 08/05/10 13:43, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite > infrastructure? The patch is available at > [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no > objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? > > Best regards, > --Patrick

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Patrick, > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >> files to all the pieces I want to merge.  These are blackscholes, >> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >>

Patrick, On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: > It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT > files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, > canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit my

John Criswell wrote: > You can use the -debug-pass=Arguments option to opt to print out which > DSA passes it is using. > > -- John T. > The argument list was this: -dsa-local -dsa-stdlib -dsa-bu -dsa-eqtd -poolalloc -preverify -domtree -verify So, the last DSA pass done would appear to have been "-dsa-eqtd". Does this mean pool allocation is using TDeq and not BUeq

Hi, I'm trying to get the pool allocator and safe code building against llvm trunk. I've run into a build error, and I see that in the past another user was told just not to build the pool allocator for use with safecode [1]. However, I really want the pool allocator transforms, so I just wanted to check why the suggestion was not to use it. Has it been superseded in some way by something

Thanks for the fast response John. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 04:51 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear Ed, > > First, someone has updated the DSA code in the poolalloc project to LLVM > 3.7, and a Master's student worked for me over the summer to update a > large chunk of SAFECode to LLVM 3.7. However, the update to LLVM 3.7 > isn't finished (we need to finish integrating

There was some talk a year ago about a patch that merges PARSEC into the test suite. Here is a link to the thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033877.html Has this just fallen through the cracks? Any help on this subject is welcome. Thanks! -- Wonsun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I don't really have a specific question, but, as I've been looking through pool allocation and the DS graphs extensively, I wanted to verify that my understanding of the representations used is correct. Therefore, I'm summarizing my understanding below (which, if it's correct, may hopefully be helpful to others). I would appreciate if someone who understands pool allocation

Hello, I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends. Because the code uses inline assembly, only the llc backend works. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, --Patrick -- If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I get back before I return, please keep me here.

Thank you, and I apologize for conflating the two passes. My main remaining concern is about what happens when there is a node in a function's DSGraph that points to a pool (or pools, if there are multiple callers) that is not in the DSGraph of that function. For example, on page 3 of the 2005 PLDI paper, the DSGraph given for createnode(), Data is pointing to an unlabeled node in the

Hello, We've just released the first version of our LLVM-based address sanity checker: AddressSanitizer (http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/). The tool finds out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs (the subset of bugs detectable by Valgrind/Memcheck); it consists of a LLVM compiler plugin which performs simple code instrumentation and a malloc replacement library. The main advantage of

If you disable them at configure time, they won't be run. You probably want: --enable-targets=host --disable-jit Reid On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Patrick Simmons <simmon12 at illinois.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't > figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends.  Because the code > uses

Devang Patel wrote: > On Jul 25, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Marc de Kruijf wrote: > > I'd like to write a pass that does both: implements a code transformation and saves information that can be accessed by subsequent passes. > > Ideally, we want to use two separate pass. However, it is quiet possible that your requirement is unique. Would it be possible to provide more info. on what

Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I don't really have a specific question, but, as I've been looking > through pool allocation and the DS graphs extensively, I wanted to > verify that my understanding of the representations used is correct. > Therefore, I'm summarizing my understanding below (which, if it's > correct, may hopefully be helpful to others). I

Depending on the value of dsa_pass_to_use, either EquivBUDataStructures or EQTDDataStructures is used. In the case that the top-down DSA is used, information is pushed down to nodes in callees. However, if bottom-up DSA is used, information has only been merged upwards and the nodes are not necessarily equivalent. Harmen Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Patrick