similar to: [LLVMdev] Object layout bug for C++ derived class with long long integer

On Friday 11 July 2008 12:12, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 11 July 2008 12:05, Devang Patel wrote: > > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > > > > > 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off > > > the clone and its associated ValueMap (I call these clones > > > "pristine" > > >

Hi everyone, I am building a binary translator, and try to do block chaining. LLVM version : 3.1 my machine : x86-32 bit, Linux Before each *LLVM IR returnInst constantValue*, I insert a call instruction & a returnInst which looks like %x = call @G ; ret %x; then remove the *LLVM IR returnInst constantValue* The initializer of @G is a function which has prototype int f(struct MyType*

On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:10 PM, robert muth wrote: > Bob: > > Thanks for cleaning this up. I like the new patch much better than > the old one. > Teaching the (abstract) ConstantValue class about jumptable indices > is a little > bit ugly but I do not see any better solution without massive > refactoring. > I have added TODOs here and elsewhere and plan to address

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:48 AM, robert muth wrote: > > I spend over a day trying to follow your suggestion. In the end I was not > successful. Here is what Iearned: > > After setting > > ARMJITInfo::hasCustomJumpTables -> true > setOperationAction for ISD::BR_JT -> Expand >

On Friday 11 July 2008 12:05, Devang Patel wrote: > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > > > 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off > > the clone and its associated ValueMap (I call these clones > > "pristine" > > functions. > > > > 2. After all processing is done, clone the resulting

On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:49, David Greene wrote: > >>> then it seems you're doing >>> >>> for each function >>> generate_ir >>> convert_to_llvm_ir >>> optimize_llvm_ir >> >> Yep. > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > 1. As

On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:48 AM, robert muth wrote: > I spend over a day trying to follow your suggestion. In the end I > was not successful. Here is what Iearned: > > After setting > > ARMJITInfo::hasCustomJumpTables -> true > setOperationAction for ISD::BR_JT -> Expand > > I needed to add a "brind" definition to ARMInstrInfo.td > I picked

I''m new to rails and have a query that uses a derived view (see below) and am wondering how return the data. I don''t have a model for this, so I not sure if find_by_sql can be used. Any help is greatly appreciated. select product ,mailer ,sum(dev_total) dev ,sum(qa_total) qa

I am using single table inheritance. class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :abc end class Student < User end The student class should not inherit the has_many :abc relationship. How can we override it? Is there a way to remove an association in the derived class? Pankaj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Is it somehow possible to use the the predict method of the raster package with a prediction model obtained using caret's train()? / predict(rasterStack, carettrain, filename="...", progress='text', format="BSQ", datatype='INT1U', type='response', overwrite=TRUE) / Thank you -- View this message in context:

Hi, as some IPSec users might be worried about the "BSD derived RFC3173 IPComp encapsulation will expand arbitrarily nested payload" from http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Apr/0 , here's some braindump: To be affected it's believed that you need to 1) manually compile in IPSEC (not done in GENERIC or the release), 2) have an entry for ipcomp in your security

Hello; I''m at this point essentially a Rails hobbiest: entranced, enthralled, immersed but not writing Rails apps commercially. I am sure my question has been asked and answered but I searched and couldn''t find it, so.... Is there somewhere a list of methods that become available via associations? I was doing a project with acts_as_tree and was struggling with a breadcrumb

If you have a class (in a pre-existing library, for example) that has been derived from another class: class ChildClass < ParentClass since Ruby doesn''t support multiple inheritance, you can''t derive ChildClass < ActiveRecord::Base to make ChildClass an ActiveRecord class to persist ChildClass objects. So what''s the standard way to use ActiveRecord for

Zappel-Phillip wrote: > Hello, > > I am writing an optimization pass which optimizes code based on an online > pointer analysis algorithm and need to detect pointers which are pointing to > derived types. I have not had any problem identifying pointers in general > using isa<PointerType>(...), but I can't seem to figure out how I can make > sure that the pointer is

I believe I failed to ask the question properly, I am not trying to determine whether the elements of an array are scalar type. Instead, I want to be able to iterate over the function's parameters and determine whether a pointer argument is actually an array being passed which contains scalar values, or simply a pointer with a single scalar value. In other words, I want to ignore functions

>> How does the generated LLVM IR for these structs look like? > > For Foo: I mean what was the IR generated by llvm-gcc for such code. >> llvm-gcc tries to follow the mainline gcc for mingw >> platform. There were some changes post-2.6 wrt long long native >> alignment, you might try to look into code at svn head. > > Unfortunately, svn head is incompatible

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While adding support for TBAA to GHC's LLVM backend, we ran into the > following issue: given a pointer that we know has certain aliasing > properties (e.g. it points to the stack, not the heap) we'd like to > >  * annotate all loads and stores to that pointer with a TBAA

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote: >> While adding support for TBAA to GHC's LLVM backend, we ran into the >> following issue: given a pointer that we know has certain aliasing >> properties (e.g. it points to the stack, not the heap)

Dear R users, I am trying to use MCD and MVE methods in the analysis of functional imaging (fMRI) data. But, before doing that, I want to understand the sampling distribution of the correlation parameter given by MCD and MVE (cov.mcd$cor, cov.mve$cor). To this end, I conducted a simulation where in each of 100000 epochs, I a. construct a matrix from two vectors, each containing 40 numbers

Dear R users, I am trying to use MCD and MVE methods in the analysis of functional imaging (fMRI) data. But, before doing that, I want to understand the sampling distribution of the correlation parameter given by MCD and MVE (cov.mcd$cor, cov.mve$cor). To this end, I conducted a simulation where in each of 100000 epochs, I a. construct a matrix from two vectors, each containing 40 numbers