similar to: [LLVMdev] X86GenEDInfo.inc

Hello, After I try making a clean build and got the following error: llvm[3]: Compiling EDDisassembler.cpp for Release build In file included from /llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetSelect.h:38, from /llvm/lib/MC/MCDisassembler/EDDisassembler.cpp:37: /llvm/stage1/include/llvm/Config/AsmPrinters.def: In function ‘void LLVMInitializeX86TargetAsmPrinter()’:

Hi Jean-Daniel, My fault, I'm sure, but I don't see the problem yet. Is it possible your version of llvm/Config/AsmPrinters.def has X86 listed twice? - Daniel On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Hello, > > After I try making a clean build and got the following error: > > llvm[3]: Compiling EDDisassembler.cpp for

The following configure/make is failing on the top of tree llvm/clang sources: ./configure --enable-optimized --disable-assertions --enable-targets=x86,x86_64,arm --build=x86_64-apple-darwin10 ./make clang-only llvm[2]: Compiling Tool.cpp for Release build In file included from /Volumes/work/gclayton/Documents/src/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetSelect.h:38, from

Hi, I'm on Linux 32-bit, and I have configured LLVM to compile the X86 backend only. Now I can't compile LLVM at all, because EDDisassembler.cpp tries to include the non-existing ARMGenEDInfo.inc. I suspect that generation of this file depends on the ARM backend being enabled, while including it doesn't. Am I right, or is there a different cause? Sebastian

Just got clang from head and getting: ExprConstant.cpp: In function Obool TryEvaluateBuiltinNaN(clang::ASTContext&, clang::QualType, const clang::Expr*, bool, llvm::APFloat&)¹: ExprConstant.cpp:1578: error: no matching function for call to Ollvm::StringRef::getAsInteger(int, llvm::APInt&)¹ /home/neale/LLVM/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:269: note: candidates are: bool

Current llvm svn at r136461 is failing to bootstrap under darwin11 with... cd /sw/src/fink.build/llvm30-3.0-0/llvm-3.0/build/tools/edis && /sw/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/EnhancedDisassembly.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-clang/c++ -fPIC -fno-rtti -O3 -DNDEBUG -shared -L/sw/lib -o ../../lib/libEnhancedDisassembly.dylib -install_name

Hi, Were you able to get past this error: make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-2.5/lib/VMCore' llvm[1]: Building Intrinsics.gen.tmp from Intrinsics.td tblgen: IntrinsicEmitter.cpp:137: void EmitTypeForValueType(std::ostream&, llvm::MVT::SimpleValueType): Assertion `false && "Unsupported ValueType!"' failed. make[1]: Leaving directory

I have a Putty variant that works well with openSSH up until 7.4. After git bisecting I found that after the application of c38ea634893a1975dbbec798fb968c9488013f4a the client fails with host key mismatch. The commit in question appears to remove vestiges of ssh-1 support but my client is using 2.0. I am trying to work out what in that commit would lead to the symptoms. I have been through the

With the TableGen problem circumvented the build proceeds quite well up until: llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable llc /home/neale/LLVM/llvm/tools/llc/Debug/llc.o: In function `ForceCodegenLinking': /home/neale/LLVM/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h:45: undefined reference to `llvm::createBURRListDAGScheduler(llvm::SelectionDAGISel*, bool)'

I ran with VERBOSE=1 and see: g++ -I/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/include -I/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/tools/llc -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -g -fno-exceptions -fPIC -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter -g -Wl,-R -Wl,/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/Debug/bin -Wl,-export-dynamic

Hi, I am beginning the porting process for Linux on System z (aka IBM Mainframe). I thought I¹d build LLVM first with the c and cpp backends so that tools like TableGen would be created that I¹d then use to process the .td files that I¹ll be creating. So I used svn to grab the code from the repository and ran configure and make. However, the build breaks at this point: llvm[1]: Building

Hi, > llvm[1]: Building Intrinsics.gen.tmp from Intrinsics.td > tblgen: IntrinsicEmitter.cpp:163: void EmitTypeForValueType(std::ostream&, > llvm::MVT::SimpleValueType): Assertion `false && "Unsupported ValueType!"' > failed. this came up before IIRC, but I don't remember the details - buggy system compiler? Try searching the archives. Also, if you

I searched the archives and found this from last month: I ran into the same problem and fixed it by forcing the MVT::SimpleValueType enum to be 64 bits so that all of the types in the union later in the class are the same size. I tested this on ppc64 and x86_64. Index: include/llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.h =================================================================== ---

Hello, Neale > -lLLVMBitReader /home/neale/LLVM/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMCBackend.o > -lLLVMCodeGen -lLLVMScalarOpts -lLLVMTransformUtils -lLLVMipa -lLLVMAnalysis > /home/neale/LLVM/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMCppBackend.o -lLLVMTarget -lLLVMCore > -lLLVMSupport -lLLVMSystem -lpthread -ldl -lm -lelf It seems, that you did not specify any single backend except C. Please do so. > So it

I have written a managesieve server from scratch in Python. I did just enough work to get it working with avelsieve (the squirrelmail plugin), smartsieve, and KDE's sieve kioplugin. It supports the entire Internet draft. Since I didn't have a working sieve server to compare against, I'm not sure if it's 100% compatible with timsieved. Client applications seem to work okay

Hello, Neale > These entry points are in modules that have been compiled and placed into an > archive. (e.g. llvm::createBURRListDAGScheduler is in ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp > whose object is placed in ./Debug/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a). > > I'm sure I've missed a configuration option or something trivial like that > but my newbie brain can't determine what it is. make

I've been playing around with the new IndirectBr and BlockAddress types. I'm finding that in CodeGen, during "EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks", BlockAddresses are not updated to point to the newly merged block if the original block was eliminated. This is causing me problems. Mind you, I'm experimenting with this using the Sparc backend, which could be the source of blame, but

My apologies. This problem was indeed with my changes to the backend. Next time I will more carefully examine the source of the problem. :) On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Marc de Kruijf <dekruijf at wisc.edu> wrote: > I've been playing around with the new IndirectBr and BlockAddress types. > I'm finding that in CodeGen, during "EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks", >

Hi I''m new to Rails and I''m struggling with a ''has-one'' relationship. I''m trying to save product and image data in seperate tables with one to one relationship. I''m assuming the problem lies in the controller method below but can''t work it out. The models contain the has_one and belongs to statements, and I tried swapping these

Add several .gitignore rules to various directories to ensure a clean worktree after a default build. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> --- Just cloned and built LLVM. This annoyed me. Here's a trivial patch. .gitignore | 10 ++++++++++ bindings/ocaml/llvm/.gitignore | 1 + docs/.gitignore