similar to: [LLVMdev] llvmbugs mailing list going crazy

Currently the LLVMbugs list only receives emails when a new bug is filed or an existing bug gets finally resolved. The gcc-bugs list on the other hand receives an email for every new comment in bugzilla. This leads to much better transparency, because you can easily see which bugs are currently being worked on; while the current LLVMbugs setup left you totally in the dark. So my suggestion would

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:09:02AM +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On 02/12/2018 05:31, M. Balridge wrote: > > > Quoting dovecot-e51 at deemzed.uk: > > > >> Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been > >> harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is > >> unique and not used for anything else. >

Hi all, i'm trying from several days to setup a SLA on my machine with some THOMSON 2030. My goal is to bind every F key to an extension (NOT a trunk). So, F1 = 201, F2 = 202, F3 = 203, and so on... I'm googled thousand of pages and many more confusing concepts are in my mind. My server uses extensions with numbering 2XX placed in context 'phones'. I set yet in sip.conf:

I have dovecot-0.99.11-1FC3.4. I use Pine on the server and Outlook 2003 on remote computers to access IMAP and POP3 to access via my blackberry 7100t. It seems that after using IMAP and then going back to pine it somehow refreshes everything and all the messages are picked up on my blackberry once again as if the emails are new. So everything that is in my inbox is now pushed or grabbed

Anton, I didn't know that EQUIVALENCE is the only unsupported major Fortran feature, as this bug says. Can you give me an update on the status of the Fortran front-end and what the near-term goals are? I am getting more requests from academics doing HPC compilers and it would be useful to know where Fortran support stands. Other llvmdev'ers may be interested too. Thanks,

I don't even know how to start this e-mail. Okay, first I installed samba 2.0.7 directly from the SGI website. It looked pretty good and I thought I was on my way to an easy install. I guess I should tell you my set up. I have a SGI Octane that has samba on it then I have one windows 98 PC connected to it (they can ping each others IP addresses so I know the cable and network cards are

I'm forwarding this bug resolution because it has a pretty wide impact on LLVM developers. This bug (451) has been resolved (well, works for me anyway). If you have reconfigured your build tree since October 4th, you need to reconfigure again. The bug produced shared objects that don't have a .so extension. Reconfiguring will fix this problem. The notes below show what was needed to

Could someone please tell me why this is not working? See these are events, and when the "start_date" of each event goes by into yesterday, i want it to automatically be "archived", or set the active field to "0" this is what i''ve written so far, there''s no errors when i load it but it doesn''t actually change anything in the database. if

any suggestions on why I am gaining this error. ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid in ProjectsController#create Mysql::Error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' , , , , )'' at line 1: INSERT INTO projects (`name`, `date_created`, `quote_id`, `client_id`, `description`, `user_id`)

Ok... I know I have asked this question before, but have never gotten an answer... When I press the hold button on my phone, should the caller hear music just like when I park the caller or transfer them to another extension? Please assist... -gcc

> Anyone seeing this failure? > > FAIL: /Volumes/Gir/devel/llvm/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Generic/2007-04-14-EHSelectorCrash.ll > for PR1326 Seems it was due to my changes. Investigating. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Hello, Tom > * Intel and AMD machines running on Win32 using MinGW libraries > (native) As you can see here, LLVM is happy on win32. > without installing third-party libraries? Do these libraries need to > be distributed along with the generated executables? It depends on, how exactly you're compiling LLVM. If you'll go with Cygwin-generated binaries, then yes

It looks like something has gotten its clock off by 12 hours; this arrived at 5:37 PM local time, and the clock on my local machine is correct... On Jan 3, 2008, at 5:37 AM, bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1896 > > Summary: Global Variable Optimizer fails assertion in > OptimizeAwayTrappingUsesOfLoads

Vikram, > I didn't know that EQUIVALENCE is the only unsupported major Fortran > feature, as this bug says. Can you give me an update on the status of > the Fortran front-end and what the near-term goals are? Ok. I was going to post something soon after 2.2 release, but let's do it now. LLVM 2.2 will contain (as a part of llvm-gcc 4.2) a port of gfortran compiler to the LLVM

is it just me and my mail servers going wacko or is there a ton of traffic on the mailing list today? - rh -- Robert Hanson - Abba Communications Computer & Internet Services (509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net

Dear all, I accidently posted this message to dovecot-news and want to apologize for any trouble I may have caused. Here it is again to the correct mailing list: Recently I'm getting a ton of porn/viagra/diet/casino spam mails which I tried to filter with sieve: if header :contains "Subject" [ "[SPAM]", "Bett", "Schlafzimmer",

Hi, in the past few months someone posted an entry on their blog about how to do validations in non-AR classes and I cant find it any more. Anyone have a link? Thanks, Trevor -- Trevor Squires http://somethinglearned.com

* Ruben Safir: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 03:58:53AM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > >> Let's hope that people who do not know how to use a tool - e.g. >> like a hammer - doesn't use that tool in the first place .... > > that is pretty unrealistic and I don't agree with it anyway. The tool metaphor is realistic. In my experience (which dates back to the

On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> On 19/08/2009, at 21.50, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> Hello, Jakob >>> >>>> I have done that too recently. Did Mailman stop setting the ReplyTo >>>> header? >>> Yes. So, now you should use "reply all", not "reply". It's quite >>> hard >>> to change

On Wednesday 19 August 2009 17:59, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Chris - Can you comment on list why you made this change? > > Sorry, sure. The basic problem it solves is that many people read the > commits list (in particular) only infrequently. They post frequently > due to commits, and having them in the CC line makes them notice it > faster. I was manually cc'ing the