similar to: [LLVMdev] Question on selection DAG

Hello all, I have,say 4 R objects... bar1, bar2, bar3, bar4.. that I'd like to include in an R package "foobar". The desired functionality would be: > library(foobar) > data(foo) > ls() [1] "bar1" "bar2" "bar3" "bar4" I've tried the following two approaches: 1) I created the file 'datalist' under pre-build directory

Hello Mehdi Amini, Sorry for slow progress this week but it was due to interesting mistake of mine. I had build llvm with ipra enable by default and that build files were on my path ! Due to that next time I tried to build llvm it was terribly slow (almost 1 hour for 10% build ). I spend to much time on fixing this by playing around with environment variables, cmake options etc. But I think this

Dear List, I need a barplot with vertical bars. Each bar should have a label. The problem is, that the labels are too long, so they overlap, or only every seccond label is displayed in the output. Here is a little syntax: dd <- c(100,110,90,105,95) barplot(dd,names.arg=c('Conduct Disorders','Attention Deficit', 'Eating Disorders',

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:56 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Mehdi Amini, > > > > Sorry for slow progress this week but it was due to interesting mistake > of mine. I had build llvm with ipra enable by default and that build files >

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:32 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:56 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> >> wrote:

As mentioned in another thread, I notice that the params used to control symlinks feel a bit inefficient and inelegant, and quite limited. I think there might be a good opportunity to simplify and also make their management in Samba more powerful and adaptable to use-cases. I'm guessing this list is a good enough starting point to propose a smb.conf param change to this area and see what

I am seeing the following assertion in leak detector. /llvm/lib/VMCore/LeakDetector.cpp:43: void<unnamed>::LeakDetectorImpl<T>::addGarbage(const T*) [with T = void]: Assertion `Ts.count(Cache) == 0 && "Object already in set!"' failed. I am creating a list of instructions using BuildMI() and adding them to a basic block using BB->insert(). I am seeing this

Yes, the hairy-edges of undefined behaviour - UB is UB. It does mean that given: __attribute__((noinline)) int foo(int a, int b) { return a + b; } int bar1(int x) { return foo(x, INT_MIN); } int bar2(int x) { return x + INT_MIN; } 'bar1' and 'bar2' have different outcomes. However, I think that the new optimisation is neat and valid and I am not suggesting that it should

Hello, I am writing a MachineFunction pass that converts vector instructions to a sequence of scalar instructions. First, I go through the function and look for vector registers. For each vector register, I create a set of corresponding scalar registers using createVirtualRegister() function and put it in a map. Then I go through the function and replace vector instructions.The basic structure of

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Manjunath Kudlur <keveman at gmail.com> wrote: > I am seeing the following assertion in leak detector. > > /llvm/lib/VMCore/LeakDetector.cpp:43: > void<unnamed>::LeakDetectorImpl<T>::addGarbage(const T*) [with T = > void]: Assertion `Ts.count(Cache) == 0 && "Object already in set!"' > failed. > > I am

Hi Bill, I am using the following version of BuildMI : MachineInstrBuilder BuildMI(MachineFunction &MF, const TargetInstrDesc &TID, unsigned DestReg) I do the following : void createInstrs(std::vector<MachineInstr *>& ilist) { Machine Instr *mi; mi = BuildMI(MF, someTID, somereg);

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Manjunath Kudlur<keveman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am writing a MachineFunction pass that converts vector instructions > to a sequence of scalar instructions. Why? That really isn't the level you want to be doing that sort of thing normally. Usually, legalization turns illegal vector operations into legal scalar operations. -Eli

I am another person who has had trouble documenting S4 classes and (particularly) methods. The methods package itself is pretty cool by the way, but it is a pity that there are as yet no guidelines on S4 in the "Writing R Extensions" document. I have actually put together a guide on S4 documentation myself for the use of my own lab which is at

Hi Ben, I've been working with an mmio-constrained pci hierarchy intended almost solely for nvme devices and switches. Binding nouveau to an NV50-based gpu results in a kernel panic as the device cannot be fully mapped. I've made modifications in nv50 and vmm to unbind the driver from this hierarchy, and modified gf100 assuming it will have the same issue. 1/4 also includes a fix where

I am trying to JIT some code containing an indirect branch (and the corresponding store i8* blockaddress(@label)). I am using LLVM 2.7 code base. I build the ExecutionEngine using EngineBuilder, and call engine->getPointerToFunction(func). When I use setOptLevel(llvm::CodeGenOpt::None), the JITing fails with the following message : JIT.h:131: virtual void*

I''m trying now to do "sudo fixrbconfig" in the terminal, and I get this: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/powerpc-darwin8.0/ruby.h does not exist. This probably means you haven''t yet installed Xcode from the Tiger DVD. You won''t be able to compile Ruby extensions without it. Please install it then rerun this program. I''m on an intel mac. Am I unable to use

Dan, Thanks a lot. Using a modifier in the assembly string works for this case. I am trying to solve a related problem. I am trying to print out a set of "mov" ops for the vector_shuffle node. Since the source of the "mov" is from one of the sources to vector_shuffle, depending on the mask, I am not sure what assembly string to emit. For example, if I have d <-

Dear Mentors, I will be writing test cases for IPRA for lit infrastructure. Following 2 basic test cases I have identified : Program that does not have recursive function call. Program that does have recursive calls. Please suggest some other test cases or provide some hints. Sincerely, Vivek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I came across a weird-looking use of LLVM_FALLTHROUGH which I think is completely spurious, but I figured I should check with the group mind before ripping it out. Basically, if you have multiple cases with no code in between, you do *not* need LLVM_FALLTHROUGH, right? switch (Foo) { case Bar1: LLVM_FALLTHROUGH; // not needed case Bar2: some code; return; case Bar3:

Hi there, RFC 5258 (IMAP4 LIST command extensions) defines a ?RECURSIVEMATCH? selection option which ?forces the server to return information about parent mailboxes that don't match other selection options, but have some submailboxes that do.? (Section 3.5 makes the requirement even clearer.) However that's not what Dovecot 2.3.7 does. AFAICT no LIST response is returned for mailboxes