Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Minor cosmetic issues"
2010 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] Minor cosmetic issues
Hi Russell, I took care of these points except for
> In -version output,
>
> Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/):
> llvm version 2.6svn
> Optimized build.
> Built Feb 14 2010(11:05:20).
>
> Registered Targets:
> alpha - Alpha [experimental]
> arm - ARM
> bfin - Analog Devices Blackfin [experimental]
> c - C
2011 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
> I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ?
I don't know what's the default llvm configuration for ubuntu! But you
can check for mips support using "llc --version". Yes, it's supported
in 2.8, although it
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ?
Thanks in advance. Really appreciate it.
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>
2012 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] Assembly Mips from bitecode llvm
Ok. And what does llvm-gcc --version show?
---
With best regards,
Anton Korobeynikov
On Mar 6, 2012 5:22 PM, "Rafael Parizi" <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script):
>
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm
2012 Mar 06
2
[LLVMdev] Assembly Mips from bitecode llvm
For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script):
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm isqrt.c -c -o isqrt.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm rad2deg.c -c -o rad2deg.bc
llvm-link basicmath_small.bc cubic.bc isqrt.bc rad2deg.bc -o basicmath.bc
2016 May 03
4
Is the CppBackend still supported?
Hello,
I was trying to compile a simple program with the CppBackend like so:
$ clang str_arg.c -emit-llvm -S
$ llc -march=cpp str_arg.ll
It produces a file `str_arg.cpp` as expected, however it doesn't seem that
the resulting file is correct. For once, it includes
`<llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h>` which seems to have been moved to
`llvm/IR/Verifier.h` as far back as 2013.
My question is
2009 Aug 12
4
[LLVMdev] XCore & PIC16 AsmPrinters
Hi XCore and PIC16 maintainers,
I'd appreciate it if you guys could move your AsmPrinter
implementation to be in a subdirectory like the rest of the other
targets (e.g. make it live in lib/Target/PIC16/AsmPrinter). Anton is
planning to move MSP430 to use the same approach. Having all the
targets use the same design simplifies the build system and keeps the
target architecture more
2016 Apr 26
3
PPC little endian?
Hi,
I am wondering why we dont support PPC32 LE?
Here is the output of llvm-mc --version, in which only PPC32, PPC64 &
PPC64LE are supported.
$ llvm-mc --version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
LLVM version 3.6.2
Optimized build with assertions.
Built Aug 2 2015 (11:39:46).
Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.4.0
Host CPU: core-avx2
Registered Targets:
aarch64 - AArch64
2010 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] Is -m32 supported by llvm-gcc when using LTO/gold?
I have gold from cvs, and llvm-gcc/llvm from svn. My platform is
Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64. I've configured llvm-gcc with "--enable-multilib".
When compiling the LTO example from
http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html I have no problems with
64-bit compilation, but get the following with -m32.
luked at node:~/tests/lto$ make USE32=1
llvm-gcc -m32 -c -o main.o main.c
llvm-gcc
2016 May 03
5
Is the CppBackend still supported?
Yes, it's quite obviously dead and should be deleted.
When I brought this up last time -- after realizing that it wasn't actually
a backend that targetted c++ (which might be useful), but rather just
something that emitted IR by calling llvm C++ functions (which really isn't
IMO) -- someone also pointed out that it also really ought to be using
IRBuilder...if anyone cared about it.
2017 Jan 03
2
LLVM WebAssembly target
Hello.
Excuse me.
Why CMakeLists.txt from llvm-3.9.1.src does not contain WebAssembly target?
So, it is like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
X86
XCore
)
but not like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
Webassembly
X86
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] Out of tree targets
Hey all,
Quick query on out of tree target support - at present I can drop a
folder Foo into <llvm>/lib/Target/Foo and use the CMake option
LLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS_TO_BUILD to pick up my target. The issue is
that I still need to patch the one LLVMBuild.txt file in
<llvm>/lib/Target with;
|iff --git a/lib/Target/LLVMBuild.txt b/lib/Target/LLVMBuild.txt
index 4112046..6e42cbe
2016 May 22
0
Is the CppBackend still supported?
> after realizing that it wasn't actually a backend that targetted c++
> (which might be useful)
Exact same thing just happened to me.. it's not obvious, especially when
reading the llc info:
$ llc -version
Registered Targets:
arm - ARM
arm64 - ARM64 (little endian)
cpp - C++ backend
x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above
x86-64
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] Out of tree targets
I believe we'd need LLVMBuild.txt even in autoconf build - for bunch
of autogenerated stuff, e.g. list of all asmprinters / asmparsers /
InitializeAllTargetInfos, etc., since targets are not autoregistered
anymore.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Weird, I'd think the cmake build should probably do something
2016 Feb 10
9
[RFC] Lanai backend
You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty
strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad
that you've surfaced it where we can clearly look at the issue.
The idea of "it really should have users outside of just the people who
have access to the HW" I think is deeply problematic for the project as a
whole. Where does
2016 Feb 10
6
[RFC] Lanai backend
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Pete Cooper via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty
> strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad
> that you've
2011 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] llvm backend
Hi Roberto,
The PIC24 family of devices share very little commonality with PIC16 beyond the naming convention. They're a register-based 16-bit architecture, unlike the PIC16. That said, that does mean that LLVM is a much more reasonable fit to target the PIC24 (and dsPIC) than it is for PIC16.
Modeling your target files after the MSP430 or Blackfin backend is likely your best bet to get up
2009 Aug 15
1
[LLVMdev] XCore & PIC16 AsmPrinters
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> Hi XCore and PIC16 maintainers,
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if you guys could move your AsmPrinter
>> implementation to be in a subdirectory like the rest of the other
>> targets (e.g. make it live in lib/Target/PIC16/AsmPrinter).
>>
I've moved the XCore AsmPrinter in r79094:
2011 Jan 18
3
[LLVMdev] About test suits Cont1
*1. I have searched the access/setting of LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG in the build
directory, recursively, and all the output is what I pasted in last email
(just the same to the that in source directory). Maybe the configure failed
to do it. My command list for building the test suit is as followings:*
*(1) cd ~/SRC_DIR/llvm/projects*
*(2) svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk
2011 May 11
1
[LLVMdev] llvm backend
Hi, I think this is a very ashamed question
I have modified the version of the MSP430, after many problems it compiled,
now I want to see is the changes generate what I want, but I don't know how
for example with llc -march msp430 foo.ll -o newfoo.ll generates a file for
the msp430 and actually did it.
but I want to load my changes the --load option is supposed to do that, but
the only new