similar to: [LLVMdev] A very basic doubt about LLVM Alias Analysis

Hi ambika, > main() { > int i,*k; > k = &i; > then why dont i get {k -> i} ie k is aliased to i in any of the analysis. only pointers can alias each other, and i is not a pointer. Ciao, Duncan.

Oh m sorry for that mistake as I had points to in mind. But still what about the following prog: int main() { int *i,*j,k; i=&k; j=&k; k=4; printf("%d,%d,%d",*i,*j,k); return 0; } here too i dont get <i,j> alias each other. Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi ambika, > >> main() { >> int i,*k; >> k =

Hi Ambika, > Using this option I do get all the vars as may alias ie > > MayAlias: i32* %j.0, i32* %k > MayAlias: i32* %i.0, i32* %k > MayAlias: i32* %i.0, i32* %j.0 > > Is there any other analysis which will give them as must aliases. at -O1 these variables are entirely eliminated here. I'm surprised they aren't eliminated for you. Ciao, Duncan. PS:

Hi, Using this option I do get all the vars as may alias ie MayAlias: i32* %j.0, i32* %k MayAlias: i32* %i.0, i32* %k MayAlias: i32* %i.0, i32* %j.0 Is there any other analysis which will give them as must aliases. Actually what I want to do is implement a flow sensitive points-to(not alias) analysis and then use that information for some optimizations like PRE. Will that be

On 02/14/2010 06:39 PM, ambika wrote: > Oh m sorry for that mistake as I had points to in mind. > But still what about the following prog: > > int main() > { > int *i,*j,k; > i=&k; > j=&k; > k=4; > printf("%d,%d,%d",*i,*j,k); > return 0; > } > Your example is too simple, i,j,k don't

Hi Ambika, > Oh m sorry for that mistake as I had points to in mind. > But still what about the following prog: > > int main() > { > int *i,*j,k; > i=&k; > j=&k; > k=4; > printf("%d,%d,%d",*i,*j,k); > return 0; > } > > > here too i dont get <i,j> alias each other. how are you

to compile it to bitcode I give the following command : llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -c -o s.bc s.c and then I run different alias analysis passes like -anders-aa, -basicaa using following: opt -anders-aa -aa-eval -print-all-alias-modref-info s.bc From this I get the following output: Function: main: 8 pointers, 1 call sites NoAlias: i32* %retval, i32** %j NoAlias: i32* %retval, i32**

Hi Ambika, > to compile it to bitcode I give the following command : > > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -c -o s.bc s.c > > and then I run different alias analysis passes like -anders-aa, -basicaa > using following: > > opt -anders-aa -aa-eval -print-all-alias-modref-info s.bc alias analysis will work poorly if you don't run any optimizers. The alias analysis passes

llvm itself is a plain C++ program, so you can use gdb on it. gdb doesn't know how to step through compiled IR, yet. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:13 PM, ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > No, this is not what I am looking for. I am looking for something like > may be a debugger so that I can trace the function calls in source of llvm. > llvm-db dosent work it says

Tried that but still no success Chris Lattner wrote: > Try doing a clean build, then doing 'make ENABLE_PIC=1' > > -Chris > > On Apr 11, 2010, at 9:13 AM, ambika wrote: > >> >> >> *From: *ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in <mailto:ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in>> >> *Date: *April 8, 2010 9:10:25 AM PDT >> *To: *llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:24 PM, ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to duplicate a set of basic blocks and finally modify the > structure of CFG. > But if I just duplicate a block then name of all the  temporaries will > be same as in original block. > > So is there a way to rename all the temporaries in a basic block or I > will have to do

Hi, I want to duplicate a set of basic blocks and finally modify the structure of CFG. But if I just duplicate a block then name of all the temporaries will be same as in original block. So is there a way to rename all the temporaries in a basic block or I will have to do it instruction by instruction? Thanks and Regards, Ambika

I have done that. I have defined createMyAnaPass() in Passes.h and it is defined in MyAna.cpp and used in LinkAllPasses.h But still the error : /home/ambika/llvm/llvm-obj/tools/opt/Release/opt.o: In function `global constructors keyed to opt.cpp': opt.cpp:(.text+0x1e89): undefined reference to `llvm::createMyAnaPass()' I dont understand whats the problem. Jianzhou Zhao wrote: >

No, this is not what I am looking for. I am looking for something like may be a debugger so that I can trace the function calls in source of llvm. llvm-db dosent work it says "debugger not implemented" when i try to use it. Can I use gdb or something like that with llvm. What I basically want is to know that when I run some Alias Analysis then from where the functions of file

Try doing a clean build, then doing 'make ENABLE_PIC=1' -Chris On Apr 11, 2010, at 9:13 AM, ambika wrote: > > > From: ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> > Date: April 8, 2010 9:10:25 AM PDT > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass > > > Hi, > > I have added LoaderInterface pass in

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:17 AM, ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Thanks that helped me out. > But now I am facing one more problem. It says : > > ‘llvm::ModulePass* llvm::createMyAnaPass()’ should have been declared > inside ‘llvm’ > > but I can find no place to declare it. > Where should I do it. We can do what scalar optimizations do. All scalar passes

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: ambika <ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in> Subject: [LLVMdev] Can someone help me with error while i make my own pass Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:40:25 +0530 Size: 4901 URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100411/33876147/attachment.eml>

Thanks that helped me out. But now I am facing one more problem. It says : ‘llvm::ModulePass* llvm::createMyAnaPass()’ should have been declared inside ‘llvm’ but I can find no place to declare it. Where should I do it. John Criswell wrote: > ambika at cse.iitb.ac.in wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to add a pass inn LLVM, and I actually want to add it in >> source

ambika wrote: > Hi, > > Yeah I found that it is running LLVM's functions. The functions that are > running are: > > main > llvm.dbg.func.start > llvm.dbg.stoppoint > scanf > llvm.dbg.region.end > > But I dont want all the functions to be called as I am using Dominator > Trees and whenever I the statement > > DominatorTree &DT =

Hi, Yeah I found that it is running LLVM's functions. The functions that are running are: main llvm.dbg.func.start llvm.dbg.stoppoint scanf llvm.dbg.region.end But I dont want all the functions to be called as I am using Dominator Trees and whenever I the statement DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(F); is encountered by functions other than main, it gives error.