similar to: [LLVMdev] How to check for "SPARC code generation" in MachineBasicBlock.cpp?

Hi all, I'm currently trying to bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.2 from the latest stable LLVM release 2.6 on Solaris SPARC. The compilation with a self-build gcc-4.2.4 goes pretty well, however, I hit a seemingly widely know error during llvm-gcc's bootstrap in getting an assertion during the compile of /data/LLVM/src/GCC/RELEASE_26/gcc/libgcc2.c: /data/LLVM/src/GCC/RELEASE_26/gcc/libgcc2.c: In

Hi Anton, thanks for the fast response. Ty->dump() prints "{double, double}" in the failing case (just before my introduced assert). HTH, and regards, Juergen On 10/30/09 16:19, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Juergen > >> With the full patch, I get the assertion of the 'unhandled REAL_TYPE!', >> so I wonder what needs to be done in order to get

Anton, I went with the first alternative with some success. However, now I get some errors during the build of libgcc with 'multiply defined symbols'. One thing I noticed is the following fact: Definition in unwind-pe.h: static const unsigned char * read_sleb128 (const unsigned char *p, _Unwind_Sword *val) --- GCC 4.2.4 bootstrapped on Solaris/SPARC -bash-3.00$ nm unwind-dw2.o | grep

> Dear ZFS experts, > somehow one of my zpools got corrupted. Symptom is that I cannot > import it any more. To me it is of lesser interest why that happened. > What is really challenging is the following. > > Any effort to import the zpool hangs and is unkillable. E.g. if I > issue a "zpool import test2-app" the process hangs and cannot be > killed. As this

On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is > the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > However I still wouldn't have expected that to result in the label > being

On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: >> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). > > Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > >> However I still

On 11/12/2009, at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi, Chris > >> That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there. It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong. > Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g. > AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen > code is

On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:00 AM, Juergen Zimmermann - Sun Microsystems - Walldorf Germany wrote: > Hi, > I'm almost finished to get a complete and seemingly working build of > LLVM-GCC (trunk) for SPARC (32-bit only, for now). > > The only remaining problem is the code generation for one single > file (namely cp-demangle.c) where some labels are not put into > the

Hi, I have a few questions. But lets start with the background: Several other virtualization technologies beside Xen do provide the possibility to get configuration information of the VM itself and the host it is running on through the /proc file system. These technologies are for example zLinux or Linux on ppc64. This feature is very important for quality of service aspects. How many

Hello, Juergen > With the full patch, I get the assertion of the 'unhandled REAL_TYPE!', > so I wonder what needs to be done in order to get LLVM to produce > code for 'TREE_CODE(type) == REAL_TYPE' in the 'HandleArgument' function. > > > Does anyone have an idea? And why does this only happen on SPARC? What is the value of "Ty" in your case?

Hello, Juergen > Ty->dump() prints "{double, double}" in the failing case (just before my > introduced assert). The answer is simple. The code in question contains extended IEEE FP argument / return type (aka 'long double'). By default it's lowered into struct {double, double} as you already saw and sparc currently does not provide any argument layout hooks. There

Hi, I am trying to install the rJava package in a Linux environment (Platform: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu (64-bit)), where I am facing an issue which I cannot solve so far and where I could require some help: The installation seems to go fine, however in the last step of the installation where loading the package is tested, the process fails with the following error: ** testing if installed package

Hi * got a (hopefully) simple question: How do I get the trap number if the trap probe fires? (i.e. the sw_trap_number in the description of the Tcc mnemonic) TIA Martin -- Martin M?ller martin.mueller at sun.com Ambassador Datacenter Tel.: +49 2102 45 11740 Sun Microsystems GmbH Fax: +49 2102 499516 D-40880 Ratingen Mobil: +49 172 861 8483 Sitz

Hello, have some little problems adding user to domain with USRMGR.EXE My System runs on SuSE 9.1 (2.6.5-7.75-default), samba-3.0.4, smbldap-tools-0.8.5, openldap2-2.2.6 If I try to add a new user with USRMGR.EXE I get an error "Access denied", but if I look into LDAP the new user was correctly added to LDAP. If I confirm the error-message and then cancel the "NEW USER"

Hi, Chris > That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there.  It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong. Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g. AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen code is broken in absence of these hooks. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty

Hi, I have problem with a windows application called RAmicro (Lawyer software). In a programm module I get an error message from the program, can not open file. The corresponding logfile is here: [1999/04/12 21:38:23, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(327) dos_ChDir to /samba/vol1/ramicro [1999/04/12 21:38:23, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(346) unix_convert called on file "\RA\ZVT\44Z"

passdb appears a lot of times in smba logs, even if it uses LDAP as a backend, as in my config. Maybe the log message should be changed in the code for something easier to debug... But this error message you said, only appears if you try to add or delete the user twice from LDAP, so you should remove "-a" from the add user script and comment out the user delete script if you intend to

Hi, one quick&dirty way of backing up a pool that is a mirror of two devices is to zpool attach a third one, wait for the resilvering to finish, then zpool detach it again. The third device then can be used as a poor man''s simple backup. Has anybody tried it yet with a striped mirror? What if the pool is composed out of two mirrors? Can I attach devices to both mirrors, let them

On 02/10/2010 01:31 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >> On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: >> >>> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). >>> >> Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch

Hi, I was told to do so by configure of openssh-7.1p2 -:) ... configure: WARNING: sys/audit.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/audit.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/audit.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/audit.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: sys/audit.h: