similar to: [LLVMdev] Interpreter with multiple modules.

I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in ExecutionEngine. Also search for a previous email thread in this list. This discussion was fairly recent, and I

On 3 February 2010 14:13, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use > ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the > foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will > probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in >

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Won't passing llvm::Function* around vs strings (function names), also work, at code generation time, > without the need for a module A dec to module B impl. mapping? > > Garrison Nope. You cannot place a call instruction into one module whose callee is a Function from another module. You

Hi James, > This is interesting. I've just implemented dynamic loading of bitcode modules into lli for my project. I did this by hacking lli using the Linker class. Is ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping() preferred for this purpose? I'm not sure about the preferred way, but at least for the JIT, here is an email from Jeffrey concerning a previous thread. The issue in that thread was

I'm trying to implement the standalone assembler for mips and I have encountered a problem in instruction operands matcher. In mips instruction set there are math instructions with two format flags in the mnemonic, one for source and one for destination register. For example ceil.w.s means both source and destination are F32 registers while ceil.l.d means both source and destination are F64

On May 22, 2012, at 8:05 AM, "Medic, Vladimir" <vmedic at mips.com> wrote: > I'm trying to implement the standalone assembler for mips and I have encountered a problem in instruction operands matcher. > In mips instruction set there are math instructions with two format flags in the mnemonic, one for source and one for destination register. > For example ceil.w.s

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Muller <mmuller at enduden.com> wrote: > > Michael Muller wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module >> (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out.  My sequence of >> activity is roughly like this: >> >>   1) Create

Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > Won't passing llvm::Function* around vs strings (function names), also work, at code generation time, > > without the need for a module A dec to module B impl. mapping? > > > > Garrison > > Nope. You cannot place a call instruction into one

Attached is what I got thus far. What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is

Won't passing llvm::Function* around vs strings (function names), also work, at code generation time, without the need for a module A dec to module B impl. mapping? Garrison On Jan 10, 2010, at 10:31, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Muller <mmuller at enduden.com> wrote: >> >> Michael Muller wrote: >>> >>> Hi all,

Hello folks, I am a beginner R user. I have been able to make a 3D surface plot using 'persp'. The surface is made by a grid of lines emanating perpendicularly from each of the x and y axes at regular intervals. I can get rid of that grid by setting 'border=NA'. Can anyone suggest some ways to replace the grid with contour lines, to create a 3-dimensional contour map? Thanks

Hi Olivier, Thanks for responding! I get to learn this way. On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:50, Olivier Meurant wrote: > Hi Garrison, > > I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: > > - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). If we go further with this, I'll have to add test cases for lazy mode. I kind

Hi, I have been brought back to the "R-Side" from MatLab. I have used R in graduate econometrics but only for statistics and regression (linear and nonlinear). But now I need to run general nonlinear optimization. I know about the add-in quadprog but my problem is not QP. My problem is a general nonlinear (obj funct) with linear constraints.I know about the "ms" and

Hi Im currently trying to plot my NMDS data together with fitted variables (envfit funct) on an ordination plot. The plot function shows two displays="sites" and "sp". I was wondering how to plot it so that the sites come up as different points for different sites but the species come up as actual names? It looks a little busy at the moment with everything in. Sya -- View

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

Hello folks, i'm a R beginner and i want to put in a same plot both contour lines and persp plot. For example, fn<-function(x,y){sin(x)+2*y} #this looks like a corrugated tin roof x<-seq(from=1,to=100,by=1) #generates a list of x values to sample y<-seq(from=1,to=100,by=1) #generates a list of y values to sample z<-outer(x,y,FUN=fn) #applies the funct. across the combos of x

In thinking about this we could use a Mutex::tryacquire(...) (non-recursive), around JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)'s while loop, and use your JITEmitter:: getLazyFunctionStub(...) suggestion in place of forceEmitFunctionStub(...). Is the lock attempt too heavy, even if it is implemented with atomics? I'll implement this when I have time. Garrison On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:42, Garrison

Hi, I am working on a UNIX machine and I am interfacing R and C with the .C function. I am trying to call LAPACK and BLAS routines, but am running into a problem where, while I am able to run the BLAS routines, I cannot run the LAPACK routines. I compile my .c file (at end of email) in the following way: [mhitczen at jlogin2 ~/Cstuff]$ R CMD SHLIB testmore.c gcc -std=gnu99

2010/1/11 Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> > I have not tried this, but a linkage type of PrivateLinkage would not add > to the symbol table according > to the doc. > > LLVMSetLinkage(g, LLVMPrivateLinkage); > Thanks - I hadn't thought of that. > > Garrison > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 14:03, James Williams wrote: > > 2010/1/11 Eli Friedman

Ah... I searched for half an hour for this function... you know, the help function in R could really be a lot better... But wait a minute... looking at this, it appears you have to pass in an expression. What if it is an unknown function, where you only have a handle to the function, but you cannot see it's implementation ? Will this work then ? -----Original Message----- From: Berton Gunter