similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question

Thanks again, Dale. Hopefully, someone has the answer. Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work

On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at > this > time. I did try: > > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc > llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc > gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s > > And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). > > Do you

Hi Dale, Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at this time. I did try: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? Thx, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at

llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an > intel > mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: > > 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these > compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwin9? >

Hi, I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an intel mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwin9? 2) assuming (1) is ok, if I compile a hello world program using: gcc -arch ppc hello.c, I get a ppc binary, but if I use llvm-gcc -arch ppc hello.c, I get an

Hi Dale, Thanks for replying. Concerning Darwin, I compiled this test on snow leopard and ran it using rosetta (that is, using -arch ppc -m32). I will try this later on leopard. Thanks, Jose ________________________________ From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:10 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Thanks for responding, Duncan, and clarifying that y'all need more info to help. I'm trying to compile binaries on os x 10.5.8 intel hardware that are compatible on ppc os x 10.4. When I include various flags to llvm-gcc, including: -m32 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOS10.4u.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 I am seeing errors when compiling using llvm-gcc 4.2. If I leave out

On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > I now get: > /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ > arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/ > Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/ > bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/ > i686-apple-darwin8/lib/

I now get: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/ Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/ bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/ i686-apple-darwin8/lib/ -isystem /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/

On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > 2) The following test is commented out on purpose: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit > > Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most > lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition, > it seems to work for us. Is there something wrong with this test > (e.g. buggy

On 19 Sep 2007, at 21:51, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try >> again and post the results > > Yeah, that should work. Indeed it did. llvm-gcc now builds fine. (llvm and llvm-gcc at Revision: 42148) haven't run the test-suite or test yet - need sleep - good night my configure flags in case anyone wonders:

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >>> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >>> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >>> instructions to LLVM? >>

llvm itself is built with gcc-4.0, but the run line is: // RUN: %llvmgxx -S -O0 -emit-llvm %s -o - | grep retval | grep S242 | grep {i32 1} | count 2 According the log: FAIL: /Volumes/Muggles/LLVM/nightlytest-pic/build/llvm/test/C+ +Frontend/2008-02-13-sret.cpp Failed with exit(1) at line 1 while running: /usr/local/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S -O0 -emit-llvm /

On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:29 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:06 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>> Now that 2.5 is about to branch, I'd like to bring up one of Scott's >>> favorite topics: certain optimizers widen or narrow arithmetic, >>> without regard for

On Feb 16, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> >> Using built-in specs. >> Target: i686-apple-darwin9 >> Configured with: /tmp/llvmgcc42.r46865.roots/llvmgcc42.r46865~obj/ >> src/configure --disable-checking --enable-werror --prefix=/Developer/ >> usr/llvm-gcc-4.2 --mandir=/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/share/man -- >>

Hi, I'm using the release version of llvm 2.6. In the llvm/projects/test-suite directory, there are several tests that are commented out from running, or not running via a define statement. In particular, I am inquiring about the status of the EH tests since some tests seem to be enabled to run by default, but some aren't. From looking at your tests, I've noticed the following:

Hi Dale, I will not change the default. I would dislike to see any regressions due to this type of change. -- Mon Ping On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:57 PMPST, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX >> separately from SSE levels. This would allow a

On Feb 16, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> Using built-in specs. >>> Target: i686-apple-darwin9 >>> Configured with: /tmp/llvmgcc42.r46865.roots/llvmgcc42.r46865~obj/ >>> src/configure --disable-checking --enable-werror --prefix=/ >>> Developer/ >>> usr/llvm-gcc-4.2

Thanks for replying, Devang. Can you elaborate a little about this? Do the headers need to be modified specifically for llvm-gcc-4.2, or do you mean for gcc-4.2? If the former, can you give an example? Thanks, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Devang Patel [mailto:devang.patel at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 1:59 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Duncan Sands; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:06 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> Now that 2.5 is about to branch, I'd like to bring up one of Scott's >> favorite topics: certain optimizers widen or narrow arithmetic, >> without regard for whether the type is legal for the target. In his >> specific case, instcombine is