similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question

Hi Dale, Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at this time. I did try: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? Thx, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at

llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an > intel > mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: > > 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these > compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwin9? >

On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at > this > time. I did try: > > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc > llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc > gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s > > And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). > > Do you

Hi, I think Dale meant to post this to ask the whole group, instead of just me. Basically, I'd like to build llvm-gcc 4.2 on host i686-apple-darwin9 for target powerpc-apple-darwin8. So far my efforts have failed. If you know the answer or can point me in the right direction, I'd be much obliged. Thx, Jose > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work

Thanks again, Dale. Hopefully, someone has the answer. Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work

Thanks for responding, Duncan, and clarifying that y'all need more info to help. I'm trying to compile binaries on os x 10.5.8 intel hardware that are compatible on ppc os x 10.4. When I include various flags to llvm-gcc, including: -m32 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOS10.4u.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 I am seeing errors when compiling using llvm-gcc 4.2. If I leave out

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Jose Rangel <jrangel at arxan.com> wrote: > > Thanks for responding, Duncan, and clarifying that y'all need more info > to help. > > I'm trying to compile binaries on os x 10.5.8 intel hardware that are > compatible on ppc os x 10.4. > > When I include various flags to llvm-gcc, including: -m32 -arch ppc > -isysroot

Thanks for replying, Devang. Can you elaborate a little about this? Do the headers need to be modified specifically for llvm-gcc-4.2, or do you mean for gcc-4.2? If the former, can you give an example? Thanks, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Devang Patel [mailto:devang.patel at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 1:59 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Duncan Sands; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi, I'm using the release version of llvm 2.6. In the llvm/projects/test-suite directory, there are several tests that are commented out from running, or not running via a define statement. In particular, I am inquiring about the status of the EH tests since some tests seem to be enabled to run by default, but some aren't. From looking at your tests, I've noticed the following:

Hi Dale, Thanks for replying. Concerning Darwin, I compiled this test on snow leopard and ran it using rosetta (that is, using -arch ppc -m32). I will try this later on leopard. Thanks, Jose ________________________________ From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:10 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > 2) The following test is commented out on purpose: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit > > Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most > lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition, > it seems to work for us. Is there something wrong with this test > (e.g. buggy

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote: >> point taken. thanks! > > > Whatever I try I get something like this: > > ggreif$ cd MultiSource/ > ggreif$ make > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/ > burg.linked.rbc'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2 > make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2 This is the

On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > heisenbug wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > > >>>

Hi there, I am trying to install from the source R-2.4.0 on my mac (osx 10.4.8 G5 DP) The error imply Tcl/Tk. I install it by all the way I know: darwinport, the Tcl/Tk package from the dmg available from CRAN but without success. The PATH is correct. tclConfig.sh is localised in /opt/local/lib and have those permission: -rw-r--r-- 2 root admin 7K Oct 9 09:49 tclConfig.sh Here is

On 19 Sep 2007, at 21:51, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try >> again and post the results > > Yeah, that should work. Indeed it did. llvm-gcc now builds fine. (llvm and llvm-gcc at Revision: 42148) haven't run the test-suite or test yet - need sleep - good night my configure flags in case anyone wonders:

I now get: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/ Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/ bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/ i686-apple-darwin8/lib/ -isystem /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/

Hi all, building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a bug? /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/

On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > I now get: > /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ > arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/ > Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/ > bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/ > i686-apple-darwin8/lib/

I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both llvm and llvm-gcc. There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect code that doesn't use long double. On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Okay dokey, thanks :) > On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency

Okay dokey, thanks :) On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a >> bug? > > I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.