similar to: [LLVMdev] Where to find the doxygen of old llvm

Hi, > Where can we find the doxygen document of old version llvm(such as 1.9 or > 2.0)? if it exists at all then I guess you can find it in the docs subdirectory of the LLVM 1.9 (etc) release tarball. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, I found that http://llvm.org/doxygen seems to be out-of-date. The footer shows that the files are regenerated everyday. I guess that the input repository for doxygen has not been updated for a while. For example, http://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm.html#adeb6bbe8b1bed333ee7608e1939153c0 It says llvm::ParseBitcodeFile() has following prototype: Module *ParseBitcodeFile(MemoryBuffer

On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:54 AM, mike-m wrote: > Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. > > Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the

Dear all, In the early llvm version, we could use PointerType::get(Type::Int32Ty)) to get the pointer type. But in the latest llvm (version 2.6), it doesn't work. Compiler says "‘Int32Ty’ is not a member of ‘llvm::Type’". I've looked the doxygen document, however, I can't find an answer, would you please help me? Thanks! -Wink -- View this message in context:

Hi all, I'm having a bit of trouble with the online doxygen documentation. As far is I know, it should reflect current svn trunk. However, it seems out of date. For example, the ExtractValueInst [1] is not a UnaryInstruction yet and still takes Value* as indices. To add to the confusing, the mainpage [2] says it is documentation version "2.1svn" which seems even more weird. What

John, it still doesn't work for me. I'm in upstate new york. And one of my friends in bay area couldn't see the webpage either. Xiaoming On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 4/19/12 7:15 PM, xiaoming gu wrote: > > Hi, all. I find out that the doxygen website (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen) > is not available now. Does

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been

Just a poke to see if anyone knows when the Doxygen pages are built. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Windfall Paul C. Anagnostopoulos ---------------------------------------------------------- Software 978 369-0839 www.windfall.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- My

Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the wins (IMHO) are the new style doesn't waste so much

Hi, The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to create pages for classes

Hey LLVMers, I could not get the docs for LLVM 2.1. I guess the doxygen link at http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/index.html is pointing to the newest version of LLVM docs. The link was: <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/doxygen.tar.gz">tarball</a> best, Fernando

All, I've upgraded our doxygen to 1.5.6. Please let me know if you see any problems. Thanks, Tanya

Chris Lattner wrote: >> I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to >> create pages for classes defined in anonymous namespaces in cpp files. >> I enabled options such as EXTRACT_ALL, EXTRACT_PRIVATE and >> EXTRACT_LOCAL, but no luck. How is the publicly available >> documentation generated? > > They are generated from the Makefile in

On 4/19/12 7:40 PM, xiaoming gu wrote: > John, it still doesn't work for me. I'm in upstate new york. And one > of my friends in bay area couldn't see the webpage either. Try http://llvm.org/doxygen. That's the link from the llvm.org main page. The docs subdirectory is probably undergoing change due to Daniel Dunbar's work. -- John T. -------------- next part

On 10/15/06, Peter Selinger <selinger@mathstat.dal.ca> wrote: > I have converted NUT's build system to Automake/Libtool. Right now, > the new build system is contained in the "automake" branch, at: Wow... this is really nice. Thanks for taking the time to do the conversion. > drivers/Doxyfile - this seems to belong to Charles. Perhaps >

Hi, since a week or so, the images generated by doxygen on llvm.org have their font size increased a bit, such that the text doesn't fit in the boxes anymore (and is overlapping and such). This makes the diagrams a bit hard to read. Any chance of fixing this? Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Hi All, I am going to clean up those doxygen links on LLVM Programmer’s Manual [1], some are lost and some are too old. However, I am confused on which doxygen link I should pick up. I see there are mutiple links exist on LLVM web site for LLVM classes. Take class Statistic as example, there are: - http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h-source.html (the oldest one, I believe it's

Thanks for the info, Philip. I will update the LLVM Programmer’s Manual first. Regards, chenwj Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj 2017-04-02 18:11 GMT+08:00 Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>: > Hi chenwj, > > http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h_source.html is the correct one. The > other two are remnants from older doxygen deployments.

Hi all, > since a week or so, the images generated by doxygen on llvm.org have their > font size increased a bit, such that the text doesn't fit in the boxes anymore > (and is overlapping and such). This makes the diagrams a bit hard to read. Any > chance of fixing this? Nobody to fix this? Gr. Matthijs

Getting rid of all the distracting \brief comment markers in our header files would be great! Note that we will also need to update our coding standards to no longer encourage them then. -- adrian > On May 3, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > > Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> writes: >> We just had some discussion in the IRC