similar to: [LLVMdev] gdb on Mach-O

Unfortunately, the current gdb support doesn't include line numbers. It'll tell you what function it crashed in and the stack trace though. Line numbers will probably come when the llvm-mc project is merged into the JIT. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Are you running this in a JIT? If so this will help:

Are you running this in a JIT? If so this will help: http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html. Garrison On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:33, Sebastian Schlunke wrote: > Hello, > > is there any way to debug a program in LLVM-IR line-by-line (i.e. with gdb)? > > The problem is, i have a program in human-readable-intermediate representation that segfaults, when executed. I want to know,

I suspected something like that. :( I was hoping i could run the program and step throught IR-Code line by line, maybe even have a look at the variables. Well, what about compiling it into assembler-code. Is there any way to know which IR-line generated which assembler line(s)? (I do not need any optimizations or whatever, if that helps...) Sebastian On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:45:56 you

Hi, Slightly off-topic (as it's not directly about using or developing LLVM): http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan "Our long-term proposal is to replace CPython's custom virtual machine with a JIT built on top of LLVM, while leaving the rest of the Python runtime relatively intact." Just curious, has anyone here heard more about this project? Regards,

Hello, is there any way to debug a program in LLVM-IR line-by-line (i.e. with gdb)? The problem is, i have a program in human-readable-intermediate representation that segfaults, when executed. I want to know, which line in the IR causes this. Any help is appreciated. Best regards, Sebastian

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > Slightly off-topic (as it's not directly about using or developing LLVM): > > http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan > > "Our long-term proposal is to replace CPython's custom virtual machine > with a JIT built on top of LLVM, while leaving the

In Unladen Swallow we (intend to) compile each function as we determine it's hot. To "compile" a function means to translate it from CPython bytecode to LLVM IR, optimize the IR using a FunctionPassManager, and JIT the IR to machine code. We'd like to include inlining among our optimizations. Currently the Inliner is a CallGraphSCCPass, which can only be run by the

Thanks Reid - I'm on Windows. I guess I just assumed I was missing something obvious in how to hook up the JIT and disassembler! Given the nice looking disassembly code I found, I thought people would be doing it all the time :-) b. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: > If you're on a recent flavor of Linux, you may be able to just

I know you haven't been able to get the JIT gdb support to work on FreeBSD (right?), but this is exactly the problem that we ran into that it solves. http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html I don't know what heuristic gdb is trying to use to unwind the stack, but it doesn't work. I asked a gdb developer about it two summers ago when I was working on this, but he seemed

If you're on a recent flavor of Linux, you may be able to just go into gdb and type "disas <pointer-to-JITed-code>". More detail here: http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html If you still want to do it programmatically, I think you might be stuck. IIRC the length known by the JIT memory allocator is an overestimate (it's rounded up for alignment), so the

On May 26, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > In Unladen Swallow we (intend to) compile each function as we > determine it's hot. To "compile" a function means to translate it from > CPython bytecode to LLVM IR, optimize the IR using a > FunctionPassManager, and JIT the IR to machine code. We'd like to > include inlining among our optimizations. Currently

I have followed http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html, used the latest release gdb-7.1 (from March 18, 2010) and got this stack: (gdb) bt #0 0x35532156 in ?? () #1 0x355320f8 in ?? () #2 0x35532098 in ?? () #3 0x3553202e in ?? () #4 0x34a5661a in ?? () #5 0x349d9bd9 in ?? () #6 0x08052cd9 in main (argc=4, argv=0xbfbfe264, envp=0xbfbfe278) at

Hi, I’m wondering if it’s possible to debug code JIT’ed with the newer ORC JIT. The LLVM documentation has a page at llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html <http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html> showing an example of using gdb to debug MCJIT’ed code, but has no mention of ORC JIT. From searching around online I’ve gotten the impression that ORC JIT does *not* support providing

> Has anybody debugged LLVM IR with GDB? I'm using dragonegg to transform C > into IR, then applying my optimizations. Passing "-g" to dragonegg doesn't > seem to work since it generates debug info for the C code, not the IR. I > really need GDB (lli doesn't solve my problems) in order to debug > multi-threaded and multi-process MPI code. > > More

Hi Bill, I'm coincidently planning right now on doing exactly the same things as you. I haven't yet had a chance to implement the code, but I can point you to how I currently believe you can get access to what you need. If you take a look at the code for the implementation of lvm::JIT::runJITOnFunction(Function *, MachineCodeInfo *), you'll see that if a MachineCodeInfo parameter is

Hi, With the new llvm-mc code for disassembling, what is the recommended way to disassemble the final code produced by a JIT compiler backend? (Eg. in the toy.cpp example from the tutorial). I can get the void* for the final code, but I don't know its length - superficially at least it appears I need to know the length to disassemble it as a buffer? Thanks b.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Bueno, Denis wrote: > >> Running lli under gdb gives >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> [address] in ?? () >> (gdb) bt >> #0 [address] in ?? () >> Cannot access memory at address [address2] >>

I've worked around this issue in my test case by simply calling my personality function on program to ensure it's JIT'ed before any unwind happens. -- James 2010/1/22 Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> > No, there is no magic. :-) > > To me though, the tools are magic, because I have no clue what they are > doing without looking at them and using them. >

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Won't passing llvm::Function* around vs strings (function names), also work, at code generation time, > without the need for a module A dec to module B impl. mapping? > > Garrison Nope. You cannot place a call instruction into one module whose callee is a Function from another module. You

Thanks for all the hints everyone. Based on your suggestion, O.J., I've added code to toy.cpp from the tutorial to disassemble. ready> 1+1; ready> movabsq $140737353367568, %rax movsd (%rax), %xmm0 ret Evaluated to 2.000000 ready> Which looks correct by inspection - printing the byte array to stdout and feeding it to llvm-mc offline produces the same code as one would also