similar to: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] FindExecutable

Hey Daniel, Thank you for your help. I appreciate this. Your last tweak looks reasonable. However, there are 2 things with that: 1. It has changed the behaviour of the FindExecutable method. Before this change, it searched the directory the executable has been started from, then directories from PATH. Now it checks the current working directory first (makeAbsolute does this for just a file

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote:

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some >>>

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> >>> Ok, this is done and seems to work. >>> >>> As far as Chris's request for getting "key

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> writes: > >> While eliminating duplication is one of the goals I see in this build system >> change, I think the more important ones are a) simplifying the build files >> and b) making the build faster. > > The "build files" are

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some >> tests (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native? >> > > I'd really like the default behavior to be

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok,

On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Ok, this is done and seems to work. > > As far as Chris's request for getting "key directory" paths into the > commit message, I thought about working on it, but in the end I'm not > sure why we shouldn't just encourage people to self-tag their leading > commit line with some sort of standard key ([MC],

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Ok, this is done and seems to work. >> >> As far as Chris's request for getting "key directory" paths into the >> commit message, I thought about working on it, but in the end I'm not >> sure why we

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. > > I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down > miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the > "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for > 2.7. > > Tanya, I can

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> writes: <snip> > Keep in mind that, if Dan goes ahead his plans, tinkering on any build > system would require knowledge of both of them plus the python > scripts. That's adding complexity, quite a lot. This argument might make sense if you

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:

On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri,

On Jan 26, 2013, at 9:49 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28

I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya. I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for 2.7. Tanya, I can also do the x86-32-pc-linux release testing if no one else steps up. - Daniel On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Douglas

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> Hi Manual, >> >> I'm +2 on the general idea. >> >> I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no >> implementation). See: >>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some > tests (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native? > I'd really like the default behavior to be something that forces the test to either be independent of the targeted triple, or explicitly set a target. I like the

Ok, this is done and seems to work. As far as Chris's request for getting "key directory" paths into the commit message, I thought about working on it, but in the end I'm not sure why we shouldn't just encourage people to self-tag their leading commit line with some sort of standard key ([MC], [Target/Mips], whatever). - Daniel On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Daniel

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >  * I don't think CMake is good enough. I agree it solves problems, but > I want to use great tools, not ones that work. In particular: >    (c) This doesn't solve any other nice problems: >          (i) It doesn't make it easier to play with other build > systems (like Ninja, or gyp).