similar to: [LLVMdev] Build failure in llvm trunk

Hello all, I am a LLVM newer who want to add a new backend(EBC) into LLVM. After coping the related files from another target and modifying it, I meet a problem when I build the project. The error message is as follows: ================================================================ [ 94%] Built target llvm-dis Linking CXX executable ../../bin/llvm-mc Undefined symbols:

Hello all, I am a LLVM newer who want to add a new backend(EBC) into LLVM. After coping the related files from another target and modifying it, I meet a problem when I build the project. The error message is as follows: ================================================================ [ 94%] Built target llvm-dis Linking CXX executable ../../bin/llvm-mc Undefined symbols:

I'm trying to build LLVM on OPENBSD current with today's svn (feb 23), and it fails to build with the following errors: llvm[2]: Compiling ELFWriter.cpp for Release build In file included from ELFWriter.cpp:51: /root/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLoweringObjectFile.h:345: error: virtual outside class declaration /root/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLoweringObjectFile.h:345: error:

Thanks. It worked for a few more compilation lines. I now get the following linker error: undefined reference to llvm::MemoryBuffer::getNewMemBuffer(unsigned long, llvm::StringRef) I am surprised since the linker compile line already links with a whole bunch of llvm libraries ... Thanks for your help Romain On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajika at wso2.com> wrote:

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Romain Pechayre <rpechayr at gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. Thank you for your input. New questions :) : > - Is the dev package basically the source code of gcc 4.2 ? Isn't it > already fully included in llvm-gcc code base ? > AFAIR, you need to have the set of headers, gcc-dev.( Some one else may provide you with this information) > - How

I got this one fixed by rebuilding llvm Debug (oups). I had an old version. I now seem to have a classical message: version GLIBCXX_3.4.14 not found. I am indeed building llvm-gcc using gcc4.5. Is this the problem ? The fix to this problem indicated in README.LLVM does not help .. Thanks Romain On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Romain Pechayre <rpechayr at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks.

hi all, I was trying to build the latest LLVM gcc front end and it failed. rajika@:~/project/llvm/dst-directory$ svn info | grep URL URL: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk configure option: ../dst-directory/configure --prefix=/usr/local/ --enable-llvm=/home/rajika/project/llvm/llvm-objects it gave me the following errors ../../dst-directory/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:1163: error:

Did you update llvm and build that first? -Tanya On May 21, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > hi all, > I was trying to build the latest LLVM gcc front end and it failed. > > rajika@:~/project/llvm/dst-directory$ svn info | grep URL > URL: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk > > configure option: ../dst-directory/configure --prefix=/usr/local/

I've prepared a preliminary patch with the intention of implementing PPC-EABI subtarget features for applications that run in a standalone embedded environment. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26344 The most significant difference compared with the SVR4 ABI is the use of SDA (small data area). This allows full-word constants and data to be grouped into small-data sections accessed using relocated

Ok. Thank you for your input. New questions :) : - Is the dev package basically the source code of gcc 4.2 ? Isn't it already fully included in llvm-gcc code base ? - How should I include bison+flex when I have installed Do I need to put additional flags to configure script ? Cheers, Romain On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajika at wso2.com> wrote: > I need to

Muchas gracias Javier, Lo que yo quiero es cambiar el título de la leyenda que dice "Pearson residuals" a español "Residuales de Pearson", pero no me doy cuenta como. También en lugar de "p-value", que diga "Valor de P". Es posible? Manuel 2013/7/4 Marcuzzi, Javier Rubén <javier.ruben.marcuzzi@gmail.com> > Estimado Manuel Spíndola > >

I need to add, also you'll need bison+flex. Rajika On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajika at wso2.com> wrote: > You'll need to install the dev packages for gcc 4.2. > > Rajika > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Romain Pechayre <rpechayr at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I am trying to build the latest version

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Andersen via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:39:53 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [MC] Target-Independent Small Data Section Handling > > Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC > maintainers:

Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC maintainers: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26344 It's now rebased for the latest master commits, `check-all` test results match those of the upstream base. There is also a clang driver patch, extending PPC target support for the `-G` flag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26345 And lld patch implementing the _SDA_BASE_ symbols and includes an

hi, I am getting following compilation error while compiling llvm. I installed the missing libs. using my package manager (and there are in /usr/loca/lib path). Any clue to fix the problem. Thanks! /home/rajika/projects/llvm/llvm-objects/Debug/bin/tblgen: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[1]: ***

I think it'd be nice to have a ToC describing what you plan to cover in the "hello world" tutorial. I'll take a look at the tutorial in the week end and send feed back. Rajika On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:02 AM, F van der Meeren <llvm-dev at code2develop.com>wrote: > I am going to post my first chapter, just to see if it is acceptable. > Any feedback is good feedback

Thanks :-) One last thing. It seems like the patch has a lot of whitespace changes. Could you create the diff with the -b option? -bw On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Bill, > Thanks for the comments. I'll update the patch according to that. > > -Rajika > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Bill Wendling

hello everybody, I have added few improvements to my patch. Please review the new patch directly. Thanks! -Rajika On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hello every body. > > Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using > nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the >

Rajika, A couple of comments: - You should provide a way to specify where llvm-gcc is built (just like llvm). - I would highly recommend allowing the user to only update llvm-gcc and not check it out from scratch each time. Checking out llvm-gcc is very time consuming. You would need to make sure that llvm and llvm-gcc have the same rev number and nuke the llvm obj/install dirs so you get a

hi Bill, Thanks for the comments. I'll update the patch according to that. -Rajika On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> > wrote: > > hello everybody, > > > > I have added few improvements to my patch. Please review the new patch > >