similar to: [LLVMdev] How to create forward reference to BasicBlock?

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:27 PM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me if there's a straighforward way to create a new > BasicBlock without inserting it into a function's basic block list? I want > to do this so I can create a forward reference to a block that's position in > the function is not yet known. > > I've

Hi, I need to insert new instruction into every basic block like x=1 or while loop I tried this code, but it doesn't work Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext()); AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", Bb); Bb->getInstList().push_back(newInst); the error: void llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Instruction,

Hi, Thank Brian Gaeke so much. Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module. But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary

On 7/30/13 7:44 AM, Rasha Omar wrote: > Hi, > I need to insert new instruction into every basic block like x=1 > or while loop > I tried this code, but it doesn't work > > Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext()); > AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", Bb); > Bb->getInstList().push_back(newInst); The problem is

Thank you for your help I tried Instruction* p=&( Bb->front()); Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext()); AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", p); that works well but I need to store the value of the variable too. What's the method that could be used to store specific value?? On 30 July 2013 16:01, John Criswell

Hi Teja, > I am new to LLVM and interested in using LLVM to work on a research project for > my Master's degree. > My idea is following - > > 1. I have a simple C program basic.c - > #include <stdio.h> > int main() { > printf("Hello World"); > return 0; > } > > 2. I will generate IR byte code for this basic.c using - > llvm-gcc

Hi, I am new to LLVM and interested in using LLVM to work on a research project for my Master's degree. My idea is following - 1. I have a simple C program basic.c - #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("Hello World"); return 0; } 2. I will generate IR byte code for this basic.c using - llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S basic.c This will give me basic.s which has IR byte code

Dear sir, Thanks for your reply. I apologize for taking a few days to reply. > Crashed how? Please see the below. > Have you turned on ASan? Not yet, but thanks for the suggestion. I guess I will try to rebuild my modified Clang+LLVM with addr. san. and see what happens. > I recommend attaching a minimal reproduction... Well, since I`m hacking on LLVM itself, this is not

Dear all, In the process of trying to add optimization for better layout of global variables, I have run up against a roadblock: I don`t seem to be able to sort the contents of a "SymbolTableListTraits<GlobalVariable>" -- or even swap two elements in that list -- without causing LLVM to crash. I have tried writing a comparator class and then using "llvm::iplist<

I recently upgraded from llvm 3.7.1 to a pre release of llvm (3.8.0rc2) in order to test some issues regarding bug 24233. After upgrading I starting to see heap corruption messages in vs 2015 sp1 when my program exits. "HEAP[ConsoleEngine.exe]: Invalid address specified to RtlValidateHeap( 0000000000290000, 0000000000318698 )" Initially I only got it in Release build. Debug build seems

Greetings, I am having trouble getting the Kaleidoscope example to build from tutorial #3 on Mac OS X 10.6.2. I didn't have too much trouble getting llvm-2.6 and llvm-gcc-frontend to build. Thanks for the help. Here are the steps I followed: Environment variables for build export LLVMOBJDIR=/opt/llvm export TARGETOPTIONS='--with-arch=nocona --with-tune=generic' export

I am confused by GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent's declaration: /// This method unlinks 'this' from the containing module and deletes it. void eraseFromParent(); In Globals.cpp the unlinking is done and SymbolTableListTraits cleans up the symbol table but I don't see anything that actually deletes the object. Is the comment misleading or am I missing something?

I apologize for what seems like it should be a straighforward query. I am trying to multiply a list by a numeric and thought there would be a straightforward way to do this, but the best solution I found so far has a for loop. Everything else I try seems to throw an error "non-numeric argument to binary operator" Consider the example: a <- 1 b <- 1:2 c <- 1:3 abc <-

I made the llvm::Function() constructor public (for testing purpose) and used the non-overloaded new. auto func = ::new llvm::Function(...) if (func) func->eraseFromParent(); And the heap corruption is gone! Did something changed in llvm::User::new between 3.7.1 and 3.8.0 ? I found a bug in llvm ? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:10 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I

I downloaded 3.8.0rc3 and I also have it in 3.8.0rc3. I did set a data access breakpoint on the first function ptr that causes the invalid heap. This would allow me to break whenever someone is touching that address. It did not show double deletes during debugging. Further more I managed to narrow it down to 2 function calls: // stupid code, but its just for triggering heap error auto func =

We are using vpn routers to connect home users back to our office network. Basically, shipping a mikrotik router that 'calls home' and establishes a vpn connection for the pc and phone that are connected to the mikrotik... user plugs router in, plugs phone and computer into router, and that traffic is encapsulated back to our office... simple and straighforward. We would like to remove

In porting some Common LISP code to R, I am trying to found out whether special care must be taken for the let* function. In Common LISP, "the let* block is like let except it is guaranteed to evaluate the initialization of its local variables in sequentially nested scopes, i.e. it provides an order to the binding and visibility of preceding variables.". I have included the recursive

I found the root cause, but I don't know what's the best approach to fix it. Under windows, 64 bit, when a function is created the void *User::operator new(size_t Size) operator allocates space + Use*. In the Use* the HasHungOffUses is set to true. So the ptr to the use* is returned as new object. This ptr is NOT the ptr that was allocated by the system. For that ptr you need ptr - word

Turns out llvm initializes memory before the constructor is invoked. Visual studio has /sdl by default on, and the __autoclassinit2 will zero the memory before the constructor is reached causing all the setters to be default zero. which clears the hashungoff var and causing the delete to flow in wrong part. When /sdl is enabled, the compiler generates code to perform these checks at run time: —

Dear R-users, I've been using R for a while and I am very satisfied! Unfortunately, I still have not figured out an efficient and general way to construct and use lags of time series, especially when I need to work with different packages. Let me give an example. I have two time series x and y and I want to estimate a variaty of distributed lags models and run different tests