similar to: [LLVMdev] Optimization Help

I hope this is the right list for such questions.... I've been trying to get LLVM compiled under Linux (Ubuntu 9.04, 64 bit) for the last couple of days. It all ends with the error: llvm[2]: Linking Release executable tblgen (without symbols) /home/cjones/Desktop/Build/llvm/utils/TableGen/Release/ AsmMatcherEmitter.o: In function `(anonymous

On Sep 22, 2009, at 05.11.48, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Curtis, > >> I hope this is the right list for such questions.... I've been >> trying to get LLVM compiled under Linux (Ubuntu 9.04, 64 bit) for >> the last couple of days. > > I can't reproduce this with ubuntu 9.10, 64 bit x86, gcc 4.4.1, using > your configure options. What version of gcc are

Óscar, Thanks for the help. I think I'm closer now ... hopefully; although I'm still getting the same error. The "gcc -v" output looks very similar to yours now. Do you see any other obvious configuration issues? I don't know what to try next.... $ ~/Desktop/Build/JamCloud/JamCloudServer$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with:

On 6/24/24 12:50, gene heskett via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a >> common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer and nutdrv-qx >> got no reasonable response from the devices. >> >> Jim >> > The cure Jim, is eliminate the prolific by

On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Got a community question at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466 > <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466> with at least two > users (and UPSes) in trouble. > > Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a > common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer

Hello. I'm new to this list. After days of reading docs and googling I can say that a lot of people is trying to use wine with serial ports, but no success story found? My problem is just like in bug1244 <http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1244> which is almost 4 years old. If I run this app <http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=4165> with WINEDEBUG=+relay , I

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 01:40:27PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> said: > > yes, but is it 'basic serial UPS' or is it 'enhanced serial UPS' ? the > > former do NOT use the rx/tx data of the serial port at all, they ONLY use > > the serial port control signals, and they probably will NOT work with a

Hi Curtis, > I hope this is the right list for such questions.... I've been trying to > get LLVM compiled under Linux (Ubuntu 9.04, 64 bit) for the last couple > of days. I can't reproduce this with ubuntu 9.10, 64 bit x86, gcc 4.4.1, using your configure options. What version of gcc are you using? > CXXFLAGS="-fPIC" ./configure --enable-optimized

Hi Charles! Thanks a lot for your response. Now I figure why the isbmex driver was not working. On the other hand I've tried to run the command suggested. But no success. I got this information when running the dmesg command after running the modprobe $ sudo modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x0483 product=0x0035 [35816.111760] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial [35816.111792]

OK, I am running CentOS 6 on my Laptop and Desktop, presently kernel version 2.6.32-696.20.1.el6.x86_64 (yes, a version or so out of date -- I'll probably do an update soon -- non-trivial since my Internet connection is via dialup). I recently bought a couple of Adafruit Arduino compatibles, a Flora and a Metro 328. Hooking up the Flora and the Metro to a Raspberry Pi running Raspbian

On Feb 26, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Victor Romero wrote: > I got a UPS Sola Basic but it is not working, I'm providing the details. I hope that someone can help me to get it working. > > Please let me know if there is some other information that I should provide :) Thank you for providing all of this information! > OS name and version > Ubuntu 12.04 > $ uname -a > Linux

Hi. I have some problems with USB->Serial FTDI FT232BM chip drivers on FreeBSD 7.0... FreeBSD recognize the USB device, but when I making connection to /dev/cuaU0 or /dev/ttyU0 I cant send & receive any data from device. cu -l/dev/cuaU0 -s9600 - No response at all, can't even quit the program cu -l/dev/ttyU0 -s9600 - Sometimes working, but few bites/chars after - no response...

I have a AIS Receiver which requires a ftdi chip driver(which I have) but I am stumped as to how I may get wine to load and see it. I need to run ShipPlotter software which seems to sit very nicely in the Wine environment but cannot make contact with the receiver as there is no driver. Any help would be appreciated.

Hello all, For an upcoming project I will have to interface with a 24V DC UPS from Siemens (full name: Siemens SITOP UPS500S, manufacturer nr 6EP1933-2EC41). As this device is not listed in the compatibility list, I will have to write my own driver. I already found out, that the UPS has a serial-over-USB interface (USB full-speed, 12 MBps), using an FTDI chip. Over this serial port, it will

I just tried asan on an optimized 32 bit build of ------------------------------------- #include <stdint.h> __attribute__((noinline)) void f(uint64_t *p) { *p = 42; } int main() { void *p; f((uint64_t*)&p); } ------------------------------------ and it correctly catches the invalid access. If I comment the attribute, the optimizers find and exploit the undefined behavior and

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:46 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > I believe I mentioned that the UPS has the serial port, the computer thus > has USB. > > yes, but is it 'basic serial UPS' or is it 'enhanced serial UPS' ? the former do NOT use the rx/tx data of the serial port at all, they ONLY use the serial port control signals, and they probably

> Indeed, but can't an analysis find at least one value for each variable > where the behavior is not undefined? > Such a value must exist, or the entire function is useless if it always > has undefined behavior. Good point :). > Sure, testing on 1 such value (or a random) value won't prove that the > result is correct, but may help finding trivial > miscompilations

Hello everyone and best wishes for 2023 :) I have an old *Garmin Drive Smart 50 GPS* and I want to be able to attach it when it is in preboot mode to a VM hosted by a *Debian 11 host*. From what I understand, the preboot mode allows us to flash a firmware before the GPS actually starts (used among other things when the GPS is soft bricked). When I connect the GPS to the host it gives:

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Curtis Faith <curtis at curtisfaith.com> wrote: > Finally, I want to look at the machine code to see if perhaps this sort of > thing is handled by the optimization passes during machine code emission but > I can't figure out how to easily print out the machine code. Is there an > easy way to add a createMachineFunctionPrinterPass pass to the

Patch and documentation can be found here: http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ubc/ John