similar to: [LLVMdev] [Help] How can we call an object's virtual function inside IR?

Hi Gyounghwa Kim, > First of all, thank you very much for your answer. > I tried your sugestion and found out that it is not what I wanted. > What I have to do is call a native C function from inside this > generated function. > Is there any way that we can find and call native C functions not > created by LLVM IR? You can insert a declaration of the function into the IR, then

Suppose I have a function funcA() in package pkgA that requires function funcB() from another package pkgB under certain circumstances. Those circumstances are rare though, so I put package pkgB under 'Suggests', and use this in funcA() when those circumstances do arise: if (require("pkgB", quietly=TRUE)) { pkgB::funcB(...) } else { stop("Please install package

Hello, I am writing a JIT compiler for a subset of the Matlab language and as a part of my implementation, I would like to be able to pass a constant pointer to a native function I'm calling. Right now, this is what I do: llvm::Constant* constInt = llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::Int64Ty, (int64)thePointer); llvm::Value* constPtr = llvm::ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(constInt,

Hi Mehdi, I think that the subject of the RFC is misleading. The true problem that we are trying to solve is to remove returned/passed arguments from the regmask (According to the calling convention). IPRA and CC updated RegMask can’t use the same mechanism because they contradict each other. I think that the following analog will help to explain why I think that a reuse is redundant: Let’s

Here in an example that explains the difference. // Only declaration – No implementation // Assume that the value is returned in EAX and the arguments are passed in EAX, ECX, EDX, ESI, EDI. int __regcall callee (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e); // implemented in a different module void caller() { … x = callee(1,2,3,4,5); … } What will be RegMask using IPRA register usage collector? Callee

Hi Gyounghwa Kim, try pasting C++ code into http://llvm.org/demo/ in order to see the LLVM IR that llvm-g++ turns it into. That way you will see how this can be done. Best wishes, Duncan.

If someone is able, can you tell me if there is a better way to do this? More specifically, do I have to rewrite all of the data members stuff and extend stuff of parent class in the child class? See below. Thanks in advance! Example 1: setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A,x) { if(missing(A))A=15; if(missing(x))x=NA; extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A, .x=x

Hi Mehdi, It is true that both IPRA and the proposed mechanism save RegMasks. So you might say that the data structure in the immutable pass should be reused, but this is the only similarity. Even this similarity is not exactly true. I save register masks that doesn’t use passed/returned arguments while IPRA saves register masks for modified registers. So how can they share the same mechanism?

Hi to all members, i have a question about class inheritance and methods using R.oo package: I have the following code and it doesn't work, guess i'm doing smth wrong and there is nothing in the help. library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A=15) { extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A ); }) setMethodS3("print", "ClassA",

I'd like to suggest that whenever there is no S3 method implementation available for a particular class, that the error message would also report the class structure of the object dispatched on. Example: foo <- function(...) UseMethod("foo") foo.ClassA <- function(object, ...) { cat("foo() for ClassA called.\n") } > foo(structure(1, class="ClassA"))

Is there a way to rename a function when importing it? I want to say, "import yourFunc from Foo as myFunc" in the NAMESPACE file. Does this exist and I've missed it? If it doesn't exist, would others think it useful (and possible)? Best, + seth

Hi Eli, Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp to product a library libClassA.a. ClassA.h contains the single declaration. class A {...}; I want to transform it to: #include "ClassB.h" class A : public class B {...}; ClassB.h is the header file for a library libClassB.a built from ClassB.cpp and ClassB.h. I can clearly link libClassB with libClassA.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:42 AM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp > to product a library libClassA.a. > ClassA.h contains the single declaration. > > class A {...}; > > I want to transform it to: > > #include "ClassB.h" > > class A : public class B

Hi! I have implemented class specific behaviour of "[[<-.myclass"<-function(). How it is posible to call the "[[.default" on an object of myclass? Eryk Dipl. bio-chem. Eryk Witold Wolski @ MPI-MG Dep. Vertebrate Genomics Ihnestrasse 73 14195 Berlin 'v' tel: 0049-30-84131285 / \ mail: wolski@molgen.mpg.de ---W-W----

Dear list, It seems that S4 methods defined for an S3 'base' generic are not used in 'base' functions. This can be problematic when 'base' functions start with something like 'as.matrix'. ### START R code setClass("classA", contains = "matrix", representation(realData = "numeric")) setMethod("as.matrix",

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to > existing code, adding a base class > to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. > The main problem for me > seems to be how can I add the include?  Can I compile the include alone to > byte

I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to existing code, adding a base class to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. The main problem for me seems to be how can I add the include? Can I compile the include alone to byte code and pre-pend it? Should I compile the library, which includes the include and parse out the include and

Dear List, I'm struggling with the signature writing cbind/rbind functions for a S4 class. First of all, I'm very happy that it is now possible to dispatch on ... I follow the example for "paste" in ?dotMethods, which works as far as this: ### start example setClass ("cbtest", representation = representation (data = "data.frame"),

Hi, I''m trying to do a bulk update on an array with the helper text_field. I''m trying to create an inputfield for every object in the array, but I''m not getting it right... example: class ClassA @arrayB[] end HTML (code with error): <% 0.upto(9) do |index| %> <%= text_field ''ClassA'', ''arrayB[index]'' %> non

Hi all, this question has already been posted on stackoverflow, however without success, see also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27886535/proper-way-to-use-cbind-rbind-with-s4-classes-in-package. I have written a package using S4 classes and would like to use the functions rbind, cbind with these defined classes. Since it does not seem to be possible to define rbind and cbind directly as S4