similar to: [LLVMdev] Adding a new instruction?

Hi, I 've built llvm 2.6 in linux, and then i installed it in the system by 'make install'. However, when i try to compile a file that uses llvm routines and libraries (by giving the command: "{compiler} `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs all -o Test test.cpp" where i tried both llvm-g++ and g++ in the {compiler} field), the linking fails and an "undefined

hi all, As i know attach embedded metadata nodes to function/argument/basicblock is not support yet, but such feature maybe useful to us. for example, we got the conversation " > Sorry, forgot to post to list. > > For 2.7 I'm wondering if you could use custom metadata attached to the first instruction of a "special" block? You could register a unique kind (not sure

Hi Yannis, It looks like you're missing a second back-quote before the -o. Is that exactly what you've been typing? Have you tried typing llvm-config by itself to see what is supposed to link in? --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Yannis Mantzouratos <giannismantz at gmail.com> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 1:31:59 PM > Subject:

[I don't know whether this is the appropriate list, if not please let me know to whom to write. I submitted this as a CUPS bug and they replied by asking me to contact the "Samba folks"? I guess that is you] Hi, I'm using a MacBook Pro with MacOS X 10.6.4 and am trying to print on my company's printer accessible via samba. Whenever I try to access the print server via

Hi everyone... For almost all of my objects I put a series of classic REST admin links in views. For example, for a ''user'', I have <%= link_to "Show", user_path(user) %> <%= link_to "Edit", edit_user_path(user) %> <%= link_to "Destroy", user_path(user), :confirm => "Are you sure", :method => :delete %> I am tired

Hello, I am using Samba 2.0.5a on a RedHat 6.1 system. I would like the smbd daemon to behave like this: When the user maps his home directory to a drive letter using Windows Explorer, he should be able to write as much to his home dir as he wants (no quota limit) but he should be able to read or transfer to his local PC drive only files whose size is less than 200KB, for example. Is there a way

Hi everyone, I have 2 models: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :laboratory, :foreign_key => "pi_id" end class Laboratory < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :pi, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key => "pi_id" end I set the following routes (in routes.rb): map.resources :laboratories map.resources :users, :has_one => :laboratory All the

Hi I'm running rsync 2.3.1 and when I run it with the option --backup-dir=<some_backup_dir>, I get an error message telling that the option is unrecognized. I'm using the package from www.sunfreeware.com If I'm pushing the data: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -azb --backup-dir=/tmp -e /bin/rsh --delete /home/ backup_host:/home /usr/local/bin/rsync: unrecognized option

> > But, what happens if you let the kernel post install scripts do the work > or setting up the initrd things? Initially, I just rebooted from LiveCD and left Grub,kernel and dracut do their job with the defaults, but unfortunately, boot process stops at initrd (dracut) stage with the following error: [ 197.768159] localhost.localdomain dracut-initqueue[252]: Warning: Could > not

Suggestion: once it's up, rebuild the initramfs. > > I tried that already, but still the same problem. Aparently dracut does not want to activate the LVs required to boot to the root filesystem, for some reason ... Yannis -- Sent from Gmail Mobile

Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org -----Original Message----- From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 5:30 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: (EXT) CentOS Digest, Vol 162, Issue 29 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in ExecutionEngine. Also search for a previous email thread in this list. This discussion was fairly recent, and I

Hi everybody, I'm currently working with LLVM (v 2.6) and I try to interpret LLVM bitcode using the c API. Here is my problem : I have two LLVMModuleRef, M1 and M2, M1 contains the function "funct()" and M2 contains a main function which call "funct()" (M2 declares "funct()" too but it doesn't define it). If I try to run the main function, I got the error

On 3 February 2010 14:13, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use > ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the > foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will > probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in >

Hi Garrison, > - fc merely executes an unwind. the code generators do not know how to codegen unwind. Only the interpreter has support for it. Yes, this sucks. You will need to call the libgcc unwind routine directly. Ciao, Duncan.

The division part of the following code is not executing - (seq(n-1)*mean(XS)-cumsum(XS[seq(n-1)]))*diff(XS)/((n-1)*var(XS)) Note: Prof Yatracos: Would you please send them one example ? Thanks, Kaushik -----Original Message----- From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:27 PM To: Kaushik Bhattacharyya Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch;

Hi James, > This is interesting. I've just implemented dynamic loading of bitcode modules into lli for my project. I did this by hacking lli using the Linker class. Is ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping() preferred for this purpose? I'm not sure about the preferred way, but at least for the JIT, here is an email from Jeffrey concerning a previous thread. The issue in that thread was

Could someone refer me to documentation, or give me a brief explanation as to why the following will not work--with the caveat that I am still new to this, and have not gotten beyond generating and running jitted code via the LLVM libraries: Imagine three functions fa, fb, fc where fa, and fc are generated and jitted with llvm. Function fb on the other hand has external C linkage and is

Hello, We're having a problem in Dovecot 1.1.8 with a failed assertion on certain mbox format mailboxes. It happens both with deliver when it attempts to delier to the mailbox, and with IMAP connections for the affected box (though I'm not sure what they're doing at the time). Mar 3 12:55:26 <snip> dovecot: Panic: IMAP(<snip>): file istream.c: line 81 (i_stream_read):

Unfortunately, the current gdb support doesn't include line numbers. It'll tell you what function it crashed in and the stack trace though. Line numbers will probably come when the llvm-mc project is merged into the JIT. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Are you running this in a JIT? If so this will help: