similar to: [LLVMdev] how are files inputed into clang to compile?

Hi Ashok, $ cd bin/bin $ ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs -L/home/ubuntu/bin/lib   -ldl -lpthread -lLLVMAsmParser -lLLVMTableGen -lLLVMDebugInfo -lLLVMX86Disassembler -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Desc -lLLVMX86Info -lLLVMX86AsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Utils -lLLVMJIT -lLLVMMCDisassembler -lLLVMMCParser -lLLVMInstrumentation -lLLVMInterpreter

OK.  Thanks.  I now get the following error (which appears to be a problem w/ the tutorial itself?): $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/  -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS tutorial1.cpp/tmp/tutorial1-LQ71fW.o: In function `main': tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x42): undefined reference to `llvm::outs()' tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x72): undefined reference to

You need to link in the libclang* as well. On 7/10/2012 1:22 PM, NY Knicks Fan wrote: > Hi Ashok, > > $ cd bin/bin > $ ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs > -L/home/ubuntu/bin/lib -ldl -lpthread > -lLLVMAsmParser -lLLVMTableGen -lLLVMDebugInfo -lLLVMX86Disassembler > -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter > -lLLVMX86Desc -lLLVMX86Info

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Kamaljit Lall <klall at factset.com> wrote: > I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some > very simple code as follows**** > > class MyClass > { > ~MyClass() ; > > }; > > MyClass::~MyClass() > { > > } > > int main() > { > return 0; > } **** > > My problem is that

I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some very simple code as follows class MyClass { ~MyClass() ; }; MyClass::~MyClass() { } int main() { return 0; } My problem is that I get the error message: test.cpp:20:10: error: destructor cannot have a return type MyClass::~MyClass() If someone can point me to the right direction that would be great. It compiles fine if

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor

You will need to link to the LLVM/clang libraries. To get the correct flags, you can run: ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs and use the flags reported. On 7/10/2012 11:35 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote: > OK. Thanks. I now get the following error (which appears to be a > problem w/ the tutorial itself?): > > $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/ >

Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek

Hi Manuel, On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > Hi, > > while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system > abstractions in clang/llvm to be one of the points that could be nicer > to integrate with. I’m writing this mail to propose a strawman and get > some feedback on what you guys think the right way forward is (or > whether we should

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Manual, > > I'm +2 on the general idea. > > I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no > implementation). See: >  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-July/009903.html > for my RFC from last year (focused at bug reporting, but involved > defining

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> Hi Manual, >> >> I'm +2 on the general idea. >> >> I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no >> implementation). See: >>

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system >>>

Hi Manual, I'm +2 on the general idea. I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no implementation). See: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-July/009903.html for my RFC from last year (focused at bug reporting, but involved defining a VFS layer). My one main implementation level comment is I don't think FileManager is the right API layer to abstract

Hi Manuel, On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system

2011/12/6 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM,

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at

Hi, while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system abstractions in clang/llvm to be one of the points that could be nicer to integrate with. I’m writing this mail to propose a strawman and get some feedback on what you guys think the right way forward is (or whether we should just leave things as they are). First, the FileManager we have in clang has helped us a lot for

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Manuel,

Manuel, After the discussion at last night, I have agreed that GetTemporaryDirectory() on Win32 would do bad thing, thank you. dir = GetTemporaryDirectory(); dir.eraseFromDisk(erase_contents = true); dir = GetTemporaryDirectory(); /* It doesn't create anything on Win32 due to caching */ I suppose Manuel wants GetTemporaryDirectory() to keep semantics similar mkdtemp(3). Though it is in

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >>> >>>>