similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails"

2009 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
> I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin > 1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4 > > llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll Cygwin does not support dynamic linking (as any windows target). For the moment - you can just build tools and not the runtime via "make tools-only". -- With best
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
> To test clang: > 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile' llvm[2]: Compiling BasicBlockTracing.c for Release build (PIC) llvm[2]: Compiling BlockProfiling.c for Release build (PIC) llvm[2]:
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > >>> To test clang: >>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >> >> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: >> > > Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug. No. Theres the runtime install bug (below), and llvm-gcc has a bug that I
2009 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >> To test clang: >> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. > > LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: > Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug. Unfortunately Cygwin is not in our release criteria. I'd like to have a buildbot running (if there is not one already) and then get someone to qualify it for the
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >>> >>>>> To test clang: >>>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >>>> >>>> LLVM
2009 Aug 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] 'make install' woes
I am getting the following on 'make install' on Cygwin both on debug and release builds :- llvm[3]: Installing Release /home/ang/llvm-coff/bin/llvmc.exe make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools/llvmc/driver' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools/llvmc' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools' make[1]: Entering
2009 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: >> >> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >> >>>> To test clang: >>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >>> >>> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: >>> >> >> Does TOT build? If not,
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] GettingStarted: mention problems with dynamic linking on Cygwin
--- OK, what about this attempt? docs/GettingStarted.html | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/GettingStarted.html b/docs/GettingStarted.html index 2e2200d..51aba29 100644 --- a/docs/GettingStarted.html +++ b/docs/GettingStarted.html @@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ software you will need.</p> </tr> <tr> <td>Cygwin/Win32</td>
2009 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] GettingStarted: mention problems with dynamic linking on Cygwin
Hello >  OK, what about this attempt? The patch cannot be applied flawlessly. Please consider reading http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patches -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin >> 1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4 >> >> llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll > Cygwin does not support dynamic linking (as any windows target).
2009 Sep 01
1
[LLVMdev] Problem building libprofile.
Hi, when I try to build libprofile with r80670 (both llvm and llvm-gcc) I get this error: make[1]: Entering directory `.../llvm-svn-debug-obj/runtime/libprofile' llvm[1]: Building Debug Bytecode Archive libprofile_rt.bca (internalize) llvm[1]: Installing Debug Shared Library /nfs/a5/astifter/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn-debug-obj/../llvm-svn-debug-install/lib/libprofile_rt.so 0 llvm-ld
2011 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] Problem with compiling the runtime libary
Hi, Zhao You can apply the attachment to LLVM 2.9 Release. It has been tested on FreeBSD/x86. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 -------------- next part -------------- diff -ruN llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt llvm-2.9.new/CMakeLists.txt --- llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt 2011-03-02
2009 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] Build Failure!
My mistake. I needed to update llvm-gcc as well. Sorry for the noise. -bw On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > This is a new build failure as of today. Does this look familiar to anyone? > > -bw > > llvm[2]: Compiling CommonProfiling.ll to CommonProfiling.bc for Debug build (bytecode) > Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! > i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64
2009 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
Hello, Bill Wendling wrote: > Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It > would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux but I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf build): [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/melis/c/llvm-svn-release/tools'
2009 Dec 23
5
[LLVMdev] Build Failure!
This is a new build failure as of today. Does this look familiar to anyone? -bw llvm[2]: Compiling CommonProfiling.ll to CommonProfiling.bc for Debug build (bytecode) Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter
2009 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. >> I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux >> but >> I
2009 Aug 30
3
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > Hello, > > Bill Wendling wrote: >> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. > I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux > but > I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf
2009 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > Paul Melis wrote: >> Jim Grosbach wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>>>> would sometimes take a
2009 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken?
Paul Melis wrote: > Paul Melis wrote: > >> Jim Grosbach wrote: >> >>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> >>>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It >>>>>
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Fatal error in build, include <utility> not found
Hi Andrew, I suggest you do a verbose build (make VERBOSE=1) in order to see exactly which command is being used to compile that file. Ciao, Duncan. On 03/01/13 14:50, APaschos wrote: > I'm trying to customize llvm by adding a header file of my own and tweaking > things accordingly. > While building, things go well until a certain point where it stops seeing > the includes of my