Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Puzzled by "set" in target description file"
2006 Apr 06
1
Puzzled by "radio_button".
I have what seems like simple, working code:
<form action="save_dh_options" method="post">
<fieldset>
<legend>DH Work Reports</legend>
<p>Would you like to fill a work report?</p>
<p><%= radio_button("user", "enable_report", "yes") %><label
for="yes"> Yes</label><br
2009 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] Puzzled by results of -O3
Hi Stephan,
> I'm trying to figure out why the following sequence of intructions is
> not collapsed to "ret i32 0" by the opt tool with "-03".
no target data maybe?
Ciao,
Duncan.
2006 Jul 02
1
puzzled
Just installed Wine for the first time last night, so am new here.
Reading this news group while waiting for a reply to an earlier post,
I notice that something like a third of the posts here are dupes or
reposts.
I've never seen this in a technical news group before. Is this a
malfunction of the news client?
2017 Aug 14
0
Puzzled about LIST "" * behaviour
Hi there
I'm preparing to copy emails from one dovecot to another dovecot server
via imapsync.
Now imapsync does not get the folder list. So I sniffed the connection
and I am trying to reproduce via telnet.
I do via different concurrent connections.
. login user password
. list "" *
Now this is what completely puzzles me.
sometimes I get the list of all folders, sometimes I
2003 Jul 24
0
Re: I am puzzled about something in pnorm in R (PR#3545)
sorry for the late reply. i dunno if anyone ever wrote you back.
although perhaps not written for clarity, i think what appears in the code
is correct. the routine only guarantees that one of cum or ccum has a
valid return value depending on i_tail (the other might as well be
garbage, but that isn't what's returned).
j
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 Henrik.Seidel@schering.de wrote:
>
2015 Nov 06
1
Puzzled by eval
Duncan,
That's helpful. Two follow-up questions:
1. Where would I have found this information? I had looked at eval and model.frame.
2. What stops the following code from falling down the same rabbit hole? Shouldn't it
find base::cos first?
library(survival)
cos <- lung
coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ age, data=cos)
Terry T.
On 11/06/2015 07:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch
2019 Nov 03
0
Puzzled about a new method for "[".
On 03/11/2019 4:11 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> I recently tried to write a new method for "[", to be applied to data
> frames, so that the object returned would retain (all) attributes of the
> columns, including attributes that my code had created.
>
> I thrashed around for quite a while, and then got some help from Rui
> Barradas who showed me how to do it, in
2019 Nov 04
0
Puzzled about a new method for "[".
For what it's worth, I don't think this strategy can work in general,
because a class might have attributes that depend on its data/contents
(e.g. https://vctrs.r-lib.org/articles/s3-vector.html#cached-sum). I
don't think these are particularly common in practice, but it's
dangerous to assume that you can restore a class simply by restoring
its attributes after subsetting.
Hadley
2019 Nov 04
0
Puzzled about a new method for "[".
Hi Rolf,
On 11/4/19 12:28, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On 5/11/19 3:41 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, I don't think this strategy can work in general,
>> because a class might have attributes that depend on its data/contents
>> (e.g.
>>
2019 Nov 04
0
Puzzled about a new method for "[".
On 5/11/19 10:54 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 04/11/2019 4:40 p.m., Pages, Herve wrote:
>> Hi Rolf,
>>
>> On 11/4/19 12:28, Rolf Turner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/11/19 3:41 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>>
>>>> For what it's worth, I don't think this strategy can work in general,
>>>> because a class might have attributes
2004 Oct 11
1
Puzzled on nlm
Dear R People:
Here is a function to minimized:
>mfun1
function(x,a) {
x[1] <- a[1]*x[2] + a[3] - a[2]*(a[1]-a[2])*a[3]
x[2] <- a[1]*x[1] - a[2]*a[3]
return(x)
}
Here is my first try:
>nlm(mfun1,c(1,1))
Error in f(x, ...) : Argument "a" is missing, with no default
>
>nlm(mfun1,c(1,1),a=c(0.8,0.5,1))
Error in nlm(mfun1, c(1, 1), a = c(0.8, 0.5, 1)) :
2005 Jun 14
1
Puzzled in utilising summary.lm() to obtain Var(x)
I have a program which is doing a few thousand runs of lm(). Suppose
it is a simple model
y = a + bx1 + cx2 + e
I have the R object "d" where
d <- summary(lm(y ~ x1 + x2))
I would like to obtain Var(x2) out of "d". How might I do it?
I can, of course, always do sd(x2). But it would be much more
convenient if I could snoop around the contents of summary.lm and
2005 Aug 04
1
Puzzled at rpart prediction
I'm in a situation where I say:
> predict(m.rpart, newdata=D[N1+t,])
0 1
173 0.8 0.2
which I interpret as meaning: an 80% chance of "0" and a 20% chance of
"1". Okay. This is consistent with:
> predict(m.rpart, newdata=D[N1+t,], type="class")
[1] 0
Levels: 0 1
But I'm puzzled at the following. If I say:
> predict(m.rpart,
2011 Jan 20
0
puzzled with plotmath
Dear all,
I'm puzzled with matrix indices in plotmath.
I'm plotting matrix elements: Z [i, i], and I'd like to put that as label. I'll
describe what I want and what I get in LaTeX-notation.
The output should look like Z_{i, i}, and my first try was
plot (1, 1, ylab = expression (Z[i, i]))
That, however, gives me Z_{i} (no comma, no second i) although the expression
looks OK
2011 Aug 25
1
(OT) Puzzled over reinstalling R on new Linux distro...
Evening all:
Redid my home box using VectorLinux (Slackware variation) and now I'm not sure
which game trail to follow to reinstall R.
Could somebody with more knowledge in this share their thoughts off-list. Just
need a pointer to the appropriate trail head. I can take it from there.
Regards...
--
Brian Lunergan
Nepean, Ontario
Canada
2002 Nov 01
0
The split access puzzled me
Hi,
Very sorry for my poor Enlgish because I''m not a native speaker.
I had read the lartc HOWTO and ip-cref very hard but puzzled by those
commands in lartc, 4.2.1. Split access. They are (only xx1 listed):
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table T1
ip route add default via $P1 table T1
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1
ip route add default via $P1
ip rule add from $IP1 table
2010 Nov 24
2
Puzzled about the rspec tests generated by Rails3
Hi all
I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
discuss this issue.
It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
produced only noise here.
Cheers
2006 Apr 15
2
ez_where : i''m puzzled
I have the following code:
condition_clause = "%#{@phrase}%"
logger.info "condition is #{condition_clause}"
unless @phrase.nil?
condition = Caboose::EZ::Condition.new :affiliates do
affiliate_name =~ "%#{@phrase}%" # <<< here''s the problem
end
options[:conditions] = condition.to_sql
logger.info "ajax
2005 Jul 12
2
Puzzled at ifelse()
I have a situation where this is fine:
> if (length(x)>15) {
clever <- rr.ATM(x, maxtrim=7)
} else {
clever <- rr.ATM(x)
}
> clever
$ATM
[1] 1848.929
$sigma
[1] 1.613415
$trim
[1] 0
$lo
[1] 1845.714
$hi
[1] 1852.143
But this variant, using ifelse(), breaks:
> clever <- ifelse(length(x)>15, rr.ATM(x, maxtrim=7), rr.ATM(x))
2013 Dec 17
1
Puzzled by -R dropping first argument
Hi All!
I am puzzled. I am using openssh 5.3p1 on RHEL/CentOS but am seeing the same behaviour for osx and debian:
ssh -R xxx:yyy:yyy:yyy remotehost
Will effectively drop the first (xxx) argument and result in
ssh -R 127.0.0.1:yyy:yyy:yyy remotehost
ssh -R yyy:yyy:yyy remotehost
I had a look at the source code where apparently all 4 values are ready and handed down to the appropriate