similar to: [LLVMdev] GVNPRE removed from main line?

Hello, I am doing a course project of "Adding the strength reduction in existing GVNPRE implementation". But the problem which I am facing is that for many sample programs I tried, the "gvnpre" pass of opt doesn't perform PRE and it leaves the code as it is. This is my sample program and it should do PRE on it but opt is not performing it. Kindly help me out in this part.

Hi, I have a program as: int main(int argc, char **argv) { int a,b,k,l; scanf("%d%d",&a,&b); if (argc > 1) { k=a+b; } else { k=5; } l=a+b; printf("%d,%d",k,l); return 0; } Now i run the following on it: llvm-gcc -O1 -emit-llvm -c -o 1.bc 1.c llvm-dis 1.bc -o 1.ll opt

Hi Daniel, Got it. If that's the case, can I implement it under the guidance of your insights/prototype? I think I can spend more time on implementation. Thanks, Taewook ________________________________ From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 9:41:30 PM To: Taewook Oh Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [NewGVN] Plan for GVNPRE? Of

Hi Daniel, Thank you for your detailed reply, and thank you for working on GVNPRE. I’d more than happy to test/evaluate it with our benchmark once it is ready. Please let me know if you need any help. Thanks, Taewook From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 6:13 PM To: Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org"

Hi All, I am trying to run some of our web applications, which are specifically developed having MS IE in mind, through wine on Suse Linux. I am just concerned that is there any license obligations to MS if we use IE or some IE related dll files in wine...??? The idea is to reduce the MS licenses and we're that even after running the IE in Wine does it require any MS license...?? Thanks

Hi All, The PRE or GVNPRE is not effective for the below use case. int sum; int phi =30; void f (int i, int *a) { if ((a[i] << (1)) > -15) sum =(phi+ 0x7fffffffL )/ a[i]; if ((a[i] << (2)) > -15) sum =(phi + 0x7fffffffL) /a[i]; } respective asm (clang on trunk ) #clang -O3 -S test.c BB#0: # %entry pushl %edi pushl %esi

Is it even remotely possible that after a successful rsync, the file sizes on both ends are different ??? We use rsync extensively to distribute our builds across all our development sites. Here is how our rsync process works 1. SiteA creates a build #1 2. SiteB rsync's build #1 3. SiteA creates a build #2 4. SiteB rsync's build #2 using contents of build #01 (i.e. we rsync build #02

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, andreas burman wrote: > I'm planning to apply for SoC and I would like some hints on which projects > the community are most interested in. > > The two projects that I right now think looks most interesting is: > > * Writing an backend for MIPS > and > * New Transformations and Analyses > - Implement GVN-PRE > - Value range propagation

> To me, GVN-PRE and a MIPS backend would be the most useful ones. Do you > have MIPS hardware to test on? If not, a GVNPRE pass might be better, > though you could do the port with a good simulator. Daniel Berlin knows > much about GVNPRE, so he could probably comment more on it. I implemented GVN-PRE for GCC. You could probably do an implementation for LLVM in three months,

Hello, In some of our internal benchmarks, I observe that LLVM performs worse than GCC because LLVM fails to perform PRE when GCC can. I hope this problem goes away when NewGVN equipped with PRE, and wonder if anyone has an idea about the status of PRE on top of NewGVN. Thanks! Best, Taewook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Christopher Wood <christopherwood07 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: >> >> As for a "better" way to implement PRE, it depends on what algorithm >> you want to use. If you just want to write a PRE pass, that's easy >> enough without dominance

I have written a simple pass. I have been successful to execute it. I want LLVM to execute it. I don't know how to include a pass in llvm actual pass list, such it automatically invokes it just like GVNPre pass or some other pass. They have already been limked in llvm actual pass list. -- regards, soumya prasad ukil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Soumya_Prasad_Ukil wrote: > Pls help. You didn't say what was actually running the passes. (llvm-gcc? clang? opt -some -passes?) What you probably want is to modify one of the lists in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h. Nick > > On 21 August 2010 17:32, Soumya_Prasad_Ukil <ukil.soumya at gmail.com > <mailto:ukil.soumya at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I have

Pls help. On 21 August 2010 17:32, Soumya_Prasad_Ukil <ukil.soumya at gmail.com> wrote: > I have written a simple pass. I have been successful to execute it. I want > LLVM to execute it. I don't know how to include a pass in llvm actual pass > list, such it automatically invokes it just like GVNPre pass or some other > pass. They have already been limked in llvm actual pass

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:41 AM, josey's...JJ frm kollam nw @ calicut.... <joseykollam at gmail.com> wrote: > i wish to develop llvm SSAPRE compiler optimization for my engineering > academic project .for,that i have a sample c++ program and its .ll > file.anyone have SSAPRE implementation in c++. if anyone have, please give > me that implementation immediately. In the old

Look I have written a PRE pass. opt is running that pass. I have included my pass name there in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h file. To do that, I have got some error. Because it also requires the definition of the pass in some other file also. I observed how gvn pre pass is added to the pass list. I had followed the same way, but failed. Cna you kindly tell what needs to be done in this

Hi LLVMers, I am a PHD student in CS dept in UIUC, I am doing a project for Vikram's course, it is about PRE. I would like to know why you didn't choose SSAPRE in LLVM, since it seems to be more suitable for LLVM (it can operate directly on SSA form and avoid the conversion between SSA and bit-vector). Can anyone tell me the reason? Xuehai

The GVN algorithm used in LLVM currently (I'm rewriting it) is the basic hash based RPO algorithm. The new one i'm writing is based on http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512536 (see https://github.com/dberlin/llvm-gvn-rewrite) LLVM has different algorithms for both scalar PRE and load PRE. They are basically variants of standard PRE algorithms transformed into SSA, but with some

Soumya_Prasad_Ukil wrote: > Look I have written a PRE pass. opt is running that pass. I have > included my pass name there in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h > file. To do that, I have got some error. Because it also requires the > definition of the pass in some other file also. I observed how gvn pre > pass is added to the pass list. I had followed the same way, but failed.

Hi, I'm planning to apply for SoC and I would like some hints on which projects the community are most interested in. The two projects that I right now think looks most interesting is: * Writing an backend for MIPS and * New Transformations and Analyses - Implement GVN-PRE - Value range propagation pass What do you think, would any of these two make a good SoC project?